Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:38:16.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Colombian Narcotics and United States-Colombian Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Richard B. Craig
Richard B. Craig*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years Latin America has become the principal source of narcotic drugs on the illicit United States market. Five of the nine countries granted top-priority status in State Department narcopolitics are located in Latin America. Mexico, having earlier supplied 80% of the heroin used by American addicts, is currently the source of approximately 40% of the drug. Coca grown primarily in Bolivia and Peru, shipped through Ecuador, and processed into cocaine in Colombia monopolizes the world market. In the wake of Mexico's highly successful herbicide campaign, Colombian marijuana has come to dominate the American pot scene. And again in response to U.S. demand, Colombia has become the world's foremost manufacturer of illicit methaqualone.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , August 1981 , pp. 243 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anif [Asociación Nacional de Instituciones Financieras] (1979) Marihuana: legalización o represión. Bogotá: Biblioteca ANIF.Google Scholar
Aschmann, H. (1960) “Indian pastoralists of the Guajira peninsula.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 50: 408–418.Google Scholar
Berry, A. (1978) “Rural poverty in twentieth century Colombia.” J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 20: 355–376.Google Scholar
Blutstein, H., Edwards, J. D., Johnston, K. T., McMorris, D. S., and Rudolph, J. D. (1977) Area Handbook for Colombia. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
CBS Television Network (1978) “60 minutes: The cocaine memorandum.” April 2.Google Scholar
Craig, R. B. (1980) “Operation condor: Mexico's antidrug campaign enters a new era.” J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 22: 345–363.Google Scholar
Craig, R. B. (1978) “La campaña permanente: Mexico's antidrug campaign.” J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 20: 107–131.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1979a) March 13.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1979b) February 5.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1978a) September 22.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1978b) September 8.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1978c) August 22.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1978d) February 14.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1977a) May 25.Google Scholar
Excelsior [Mexico City] (1977b) May 21.Google Scholar
GAO [U.S. General Accounting Office] (1978) Drug Control in South America Having Limited Success—Some Progress but Problems are Formidable. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Interview (1980a) July 25. Washington, DC: Drug Enforcement Administration.Google Scholar
Interview (1980b) July 25. Washington, DC: Department of State.Google Scholar
Interview (1980c) July 24. Washington, DC: Department of State.Google Scholar
Interview (1980d) March 28. Mexico, D.F.: U.S. Embassy.Google Scholar
Interview (1979) May 9. Kent, OH: Kent State University.Google Scholar
Miami Herald (1980) May 13.Google Scholar
Miami Herald (1978a) April 8.Google Scholar
Miami Herald (1978b) April 5.Google Scholar
New York Times (1980a) November 3.Google Scholar
New York Times (1980b) April 3.Google Scholar
New York Times (1978) March 19.Google Scholar
Office of Drug Abuse Policy (1978) International Narcotics Control Policy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ruhl, J. M. (1978) “Party system in crisis? An analysis of Colombia's 1978 elections.” Inter-American Economic Affairs 32 (Winter): 29–45.Google Scholar
Slater, L. (1980) “Colombia: The Cinderella of cannabis and coke.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at El Paso.Google Scholar
South, S. B. (1977) “Coca in Bolivia.” Geographical Rev. 67 (January): 22–33.Google Scholar
Strategy Council on Drug Abuse (1979) Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention 1979. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
El Tiempo [Bogotá] (1979) September 12.Google Scholar
El Tiempo [Bogotá] (1978a) October 5.Google Scholar
El Tiempo [Bogotá] (1978b) August 8.Google Scholar
Times of the Americas (1978) April 26.Google Scholar
U.S. House (1980) The Use of Paraquat to Eradicate Illicit Marihuana Crops and the Health Implications of Paraquat-Contaminated Marihuana on the U.S. Market. A Report. Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. House (1979) Oversight Hearings on Federal Drug Strategy (May and June).Google Scholar
U.S. House (1977) T. A. Todman testimony before the House Select Committee on Narcotics Abuse and Control. Oversight Hearings. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1979a) D. C. Asencio testimony before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, Illegal Narcotics Profits. December 12: 204–219. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1979b) D. C. Asencio testimony before the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice of the Senate Judiciary Committee. September 19. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1978) Stopping “Mother Ships”—A Loophole in Drug Enforcement. J. H. Linnemann testimony before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. August 22: 25–26. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Washington Post (1980) November 12.Google Scholar
U.S. Senate (1978) March 11.Google Scholar