Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:01:20.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Latest IMF-Sponsored Stabilization Program: Does It Represent a Long-Term Solution for Mexico’s Economy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Miguel D. Ramírez
Miguel D. Ramírez*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at Trinity College, Hartford (CT)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 20 December 1994, the newly inaugurated government of President Ernesto Zedillo shattered Mexico’s façade of modernity by finding itself, first, forced to devalue the currency by 14% (in real terms), and then, only a few days later and under intense pressure from speculators (sacadolares), to allow the peso to float freely against the dollar. By the end of December, the value of the peso vis-à-vis the dollar had dropped by more than 30%, and the country had lost between $7 and $8 billion in foreign exchange reserves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , Winter 1996 , pp. 129 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arellano, J.,Cortazar, R., and Solimano, A. (1986) Adjustment Policies in Chile: 1981–85. Helsinki, Finland : World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).Google Scholar
Austin, J. and Esteva, G. (eds.) (1987) Food Policy in Mexico. Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calva, J. (1995) “El nudo macroeconómico de México. La pesada herencia de Ernesto Zedillo. Problemas del Desarrollo 26, numero especial (Enero-Marzo): 63–95.Google Scholar
Calva, J. (1996) “Criterios recesivos de politica económica para 1996. Un Mexico sin opciones de crecimiento. Problemas del Desarrollo 27, 104 (Enero-Marzo): 101–141.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Eliana (1989) “Hyperinflation in Latin America. Challenge 32, 1 (January/February): 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economic Commision for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (1996) Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile : United Nations, ECLAC.Google Scholar
Economic Commision for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (1995) Economic Panorama of Latin America. Santiago de Chile : United Nations, ECLAC.Google Scholar
Economic Commision for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (1994) Panorama Económico de América Latina 1994. Santiago de Chile : United Nations, ECLAC/CEPAL.Google Scholar
Economic Commision for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC) (199095) Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago de Chile : United Nations, ECLAC.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. and Edwards, A. (1987) Monetarism and Liberalization: The Chilean Experiment. Cambridge, MA : Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Elizondo, C. (1993) The Making of a New Alliance: The Privatization of the Banks in Mexico. México, DF : Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE).Google Scholar
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (1995) The Southwestern Economy, No.2: 7.Google Scholar
Giron Gonzales, A. (1991) Cincuenta Años de Deuda Externa. México (DF). México : Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Universidad Autónoma de México (UNAM).Google Scholar
Hamilton, N. (1986) Modern Mexico: State, Economy, and Social Conflict. Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1981) Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond. Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografia y Informatica (INEGI) (1995) National Accounts. México, DF : INEGI.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1995) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1995 Report. Washington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1994) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1994 Report. Washington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1993) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1993 Report. Washington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1992) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1992 Report. Washington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1991) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1991 Report. Washington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (1990) Economic and Social Progress in Latin America: 1990 Report. Washington, DC : The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (1994) IMF Survey (6 February). Washington, DC : IMF.Google Scholar
Kay, C. (1989) Latin American Theories of Development and Underdevelopment. New York, NY : Routledge.Google Scholar
Latin American Economy and Business Report (LAEB) (1995a) “Mexico: Bleak Prospects, despite Government Optimism. Laeb-95–05 (May):4–5.Google Scholar
Latin American Economy and Business Report (LAEB) (1995b) “Which Mexican Banks Are in Trouble? Banpais Fails, Others Sure to Follow. Laeb-95–04 (April): 11.Google Scholar
Latin American Economy and Business Report (LAEB) (1995c) “Zedillo’s Second Economic Package; Targets Still Look Ambitious. Laeb-95–04 (April): 4–5.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report - Mexico and NAFTA (LARR-Mexico/NAFTA) (1995a) “The Economy: Bleak Prospects; despite Government’s Optimism. Rm-95–05 (11 May): 2–3.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report - Mexico and NAFTA (LARR-Mexico/NAFTA) (1995b) “Vat: Misguided, Unfair and Piddling; was Zedillo Right to Twist Arms?” Rm-95–04 (20 April): 7.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report - Mexico and NAFTA (LARR-Mexico/NAFTA) (1995c) “The Government Revises Its Targets Again. Rm-95–03 (30 March): 2–3.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Report - Mexico and NAFTA (LARR-Mexico/NAFTA) (1995d) “The Banking System: in Deep Trouble; If Banpais Fails, Others Sure to Follow. Rm-95–03 (30 March): 6.Google Scholar
Latin American Regional Reports - Southern Cone (LARR-So. Cone) (1995) “Chile Keeps a Cool Head While Others Suffer a Severe Tequila Hangover. Rs-95–02 (16 March): 1.Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (LAWR) (1995a) “Green Light to Go Abroad in a Big Way. Wr-95–26 (13 July).Google Scholar
Latin American Weekly Report (LAWR) (1995b) “Mexico: Economy; Better for Now, Not So Good Later. Wr-95–17 (11 May): 196–97.Google Scholar
Luders, R.J. (1991) “Massive Divestiture and Privatization: Lessons from Chile. Contemporary Policy Issues 9, 4 (October): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MartÍNez, I. (1995) “Desarrollo sustentable sectorial y regional. Un proyecto alternativo. Problemas del Desarrollo 26, numero especial (eneromarzo): 137–170.Google Scholar
Meller, P. (1993) “A Review of the Chilean Privatization Experience. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 33 (Special Issue): 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meller, P. (1991) The Latin American Development Debate. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Miller, R. and Suminski, M. (1994) “Trends in Private Investment in Developing Countries” (Working Paper No. 20). Washington, DC : International Finance Corporation (IFC).Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (1992). Paris, France : OECD.Google Scholar
RamÍRez, M. (1995) “The Political Economy of Privatization in Mexico, 1983–92. Organization 2, 1 (February): 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RamÍRez, M. (1994) “Public and Private Investment in Mexico, 1950–90: an Empirical Analysis. Southern Economic Journal 61, 1 (July): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1992) “The Limits of Trade Policy Reform in Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 1 (Winter): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ros, J. (1995) “Trade Liberalization with Real Appeciation and Slow Growth: Sustainability Issues in Mexico’s Trade Policy Reform”, inHelleiner, G. (ed.) Manufacturing for Export in the Developing World. New York, NY : Routledge.Google Scholar
Ros, J. (1987) On the Macroeconomics of Heterodox Shocks. Helsinki, Finland : World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER).Google Scholar
SÁNchez Otero, G. (1995) “Neoliberalism and Its Discontents”, pp. 120–129 inRosen, F. and McFadyen, D. (eds.) Free Trade and Economic Restructuring in Latin America. New York, NY : Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Shackle, G. (1966) The Nature of Economic Thought. Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, R. (1984) The Mexican Food Crisis: An Analysis of the SAM. LaJolla, CA : University of California at San Diego, Center for US-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. (1991) Varieties of Stabilization Experience. Oxford, England : Clarendon Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, L. (1983) Structuralist Macroeconomics. New York, NY : Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
TAYLOR and KRUGMAN (1978) “Contractionary Effects of Devaluation. Journal of International Economics 8, 3 (August): 445–456.Google Scholar
Warman, F. and Thirwall, A. (1994) “Interest Rates, Saving, Investment and Growth in Mexico 1960–90: Tests of the Financial Liberalization Hypothesis. The Journal of Development Studies 30, 3 (April): 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahler, R. (1991) “Financial Strategies in Latin America: The Southern Cone Experience”, inMeller, P. (ed.) The Latin American Development Debate. Boulder, CO : Westview Press.Google Scholar