Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:20:49.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Situating informal welfare within imperfect well-being regimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Geof Wood
Geof Wood*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Policy Sciences, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BathBA2 7AY, UK
*
*Email: g.d.wood@bath.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reflects upon the position of the nation state and non-state-centred actors in the support for welfare and the security of agency. In particular it argues that the normative agenda of rights-based autonomous security is undermined by the social facts of dependent, personalised and thus precarious security. The roles of other actors above and below the nation state are thus significant in any analysis of power relations, social reproduction and policy outcomes. In many middle- and lower-income countries, the problem for state actors is that power, authority and, more problematically, legitimacy lies significantly elsewhere across the domain of state, market, community and household. Aspects of globalisation can thereby interact directly with sub-national entities by-passing and undermining the state: multinational corporations, international donors, international non-governmental organisations, remittances, wider faith movements and cross-border ethnic solidarities. This is clearly a complicated institutional landscape within which to formulate the idea of responsibility for social policy and consider its intersecting role with international development.

Keywords

social policyinformal welfaredevelopment studieswell-being
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 2: Meeting Emerging Global Policy Challenges: Positioning Social Policy Between Development and Growth? , June 2015 , pp. 132 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkire, S. (2003). A conceptual framework for human security (CRISE Working Paper 2). Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J.-L. (2007). Social institutions, collective action and wellbeing in Peru: Anthropological and psychology perspectives (Unpublished MRes dissertation in international development). University of Bath.Google Scholar
Asenova, D., McHendrick, J. H., McCann, C., & Reynolds, R. (2015). Redistribution of social and societal risk: The impact on individuals, their networks and communities in Scotland (Report York, 51). Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Banfield, E. (1958). The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (2010). Morally motivated self-regulation. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1299–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analysing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cammett, M., & MacLean, L. M. (Eds.). (2014). The politics of non-state welfare. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., & Kodres, L. (2014). The regulatory responses to the global financial crisis: Some uncomfortable questions (IMF Working Paper 14/46), 39p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. (2006). Capability approach. In Clark, D. A. (Ed.), The Elgar companion to development studies (pp. 32–44). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, D. A. (2000). Generational transfers and the generational Bargain. Journal of International Development, 12(4), 453–462.3.0.CO;2-W>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, D. A. (2001). The generational Bargain. International Journal of Social Welfare, 10(1), 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Copestake, J., & Wood, G. (2008). Reproducing unequal security: Peru as a wellbeing regime. In Copestake, J. (Ed.), Wellbeing and development in Peru (Chap. 7, pp. 185–209). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbridge, S., & Harriss, J. (2000). Re-inventing India. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Davis, P., & McGregor, J. A. (2000). Civil society, institutional donors and poverty in Bangladesh. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 38(1), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B. (2001). The social dimension of regionalism: A constructive alternative to neo-liberal globalisation? (Globalism and Social Policy Programme Occasional Paper No.8). Helsinki: STAKES.Google Scholar
Deacon, B., Hulse, M., & Stubbs, P. (1997). Global social policy: International organisations and the future of welfare. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Devine, J., Camfield, L., & Gough, I. (2006). Autonomy or dependence – or both? Perspectives from Bangladesh (Working Paper 13). ESRC research group on wellbeing in developing countries, University of Bath.Google Scholar
Dorward, D. (2001). The tragedy of Sierra Leone: Diamonds and warlords. The Australian Review of African Studies, 23(1), 38–48.Google Scholar
Doss, C. (2011). Interhousehold bargaining and resource allocation in developing countries (Background Paper). WDR 2012 Gender equality and development, 39p.Google Scholar
Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fajnzybler, P., & Lopez, J. Humberto. (Eds.). (2008). Remittances and development: Lessons from Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, D. (2004, April). Human wellbeing: Concepts and conceptualizations (WIDER Discussion Paper No. 2004/06).Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of a theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gough, I., Wood, G., Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P., & Room, G. (2004). Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social policy in development contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, C., & Pollock, A. M. (1998). Decentralisation and privatisation of long term care in UK and USA. The Lancet, 351, 1805–1808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Humphries, R. (2013, May). Paying for social care: Beyond Dilnot (Kings Fund Report), 28p. ISBN 978-1-909029.Google Scholar
ILO. (2004). Economic security for a better world. (G. Standing, Main author and Ed.) Geneva: ILO Socio-Economic Security Programme.Google Scholar
Khan, M. H. (2004). Power, property rights and land reform: A general case illustrated with reference to Bangladesh. Journal of Agrarian Change, 4(1&2), 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, M. I. A. (2000). Struggle for survival: Networks and relationships in a Bangladesh Slum (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Bath.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2010). Disciplined activists and unruly brokers: Exploring the boundaries between non-governmental organisations (NGOs), donors and the state in Bangladesh. In Gellner, D. N. (Ed.), Varieties of activist experience: Civil society in South Asia (Chpat. 8, p. 20). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Lezhnev, S. (2005). Strategies to deal with warlords in collapsing states. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lipton, M. (1977). Why poor people stay poor: Urban bias in world development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Long, N. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luce, E. (2006). In spite of the gods: The strange rise of modern India. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Moncrieffe, J., & Eyben, R. (Eds.). (2007). The power of labelling. How people are categorised and why it matters. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orozco, M., Lowell, B. L., & Schneider, J. (2006, June). Gender specific determinants of remittances: Differences in structure and motivation. Report to gender and development group World Bank, ISIM, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattanaik, S. (2013). Afghanistan and its neighbourhood: In search of a stable future. Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi and Peace Research Institute. Oslo: PRIO.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press. (First published 1944).Google Scholar
Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, power, socialism. London: NLB (1978) and Verso (1980).Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putzel, J. (1997). Policy arena: Accounting for the “Dark Side” of social capital: Reading Robert Putnam on democracy. Journal of International Development, 9(7), 939–949.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1970). Theory of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, J. C. (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, M., Van Dyke, S., & Roggenkamp, M. (2008). Party politics and social welfare. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–66. doi: 10.1080/14649880500120491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standing, G. (1999). Global labour flexibility: Seeking distributive justice. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D. (2011). Wellbeing and welfare: A psychosocial analysis of being well and doing well enough. International Social Policy, 40(4), 777–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, N., & Engberg-Pedersen, L. (Eds.). (2002). In the name of the poor: Contesting political space for poverty reduction. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (Ed.). (1985). Labelling in development policy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (1999). Adverse incorporation: Another dark side of social capital. Working Paper for the global, Social Policy Project. University of Bath, UK. Mimeo, 14.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2000). Prisoners and escapees: Improving the institutional responsibility square in Bangladesh. Public Administration and Development, 20, 221–237.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. (2001). Inaugural lecture desperately seeking security. Journal of International Development, 13, 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. (2003). Staying secure, staying poor: The Faustian Bargain. World Development, 31(3), 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. (2004). Informal security regimes: Strength of relationships. In Gough, I., Wood, G., Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P., & Room, G. (Eds.), Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: Social Policy in Development Contexts (Chap. 2, pp. 49–87). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2007a, October 16). The security of agency: Analysing poor people's search for security in developing countries. Presented to workshop in honour of Richard Jolly, ‘The roles and relationships of the human discourses: human rights, human development, human security’, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague.Google Scholar
Wood, G. (2007b). Labels, welfare regimes and intermediation: Contesting formal power. In Eyben, R. & Moncrieffe, J. (Eds.), The power of labelling (Chap. 1, pp. 17–32). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Wood, G., & Gough, I. (2006). A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development, 34(10), 1696–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G., Malik, A., & Sagheer, S. (Eds.). (2006). Valleys in transition: 20 years of AKRSP experience in Northern Pakistan. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wood, G. D. (1980). Rural development in Bangladesh: Whose framework? Journal of Social Studies (Dhaka), 8, 1–31.Google Scholar
Wood, G. D. (1997). States without citizens: The problem of the franchise state. In Hulme, D. & Edwards, M. (Eds.), NGOs, states and donors: Too close for comfort? (Chap. 5, pp. 79–92). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, G. (2009). Clashing values in Bangladesh: NGOs, Secularism and the Umma. In Khan, F. C., Ahmad, A., & Quddus, M. (Eds.), Recreating the Commons? NGOs in Bangladesh (pp. 43–78). Dhaka: UPL Publications.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2003). World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar