Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:02:19.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intergenerational objective and subjective mobility and attitudes towards income differences: evidence from transition societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Alexi Gugushvili
Alexi Gugushvili*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
*Email: ag900@cam.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the association between intergenerational social mobility and attitudes towards income differences in post-socialist societies. I hypothesise that based on the psychological mechanism of self-serving bias in causal attribution, those who experience upward social mobility are more likely to support greater income differences, and that subjective intergenerational mobility has stronger association with attitudes towards income differences than objective mobility because individuals filter their objective environment in order to derive their subjective perceptions of the world and their own experiences. The described hypotheses are tested with two cross-national data sets – European Values Studies and Life in Transition Survey. The derived findings are robust to alternative statistical specifications and indicate that individuals who perceive themselves as subjectively mobile have significantly different attitudes towards income differences in comparison to non-mobile groups, but that this effect does not manifest among objectively mobile individuals.

Keywords

Intergenerational mobilitysubjective mobilitypublic attitudesincome differencesEVSLITSmultivariate analysis
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , October 2016 , pp. 199 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, F., Kristan, P., & Tomšič, M. (2009). Varieties of capitalism in Eastern Europe (with special emphasis on Estonia and Slovenia). Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42(1), 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aidukaite, J. (2009). Old welfare state theories and new welfare regimes in Eastern Europe: Challenges and implications. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alam, A., Murthi, M., Yemtsov, R., Murrugarra, E., Dudwick, N., Hamilton, E., & Tiongson, E. (2005). Growth, poverty, and inequality: Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTECA/Resources/complete-eca-poverty.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe. A world of difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 897–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, K. (2006). Reconciling competing claims of the welfare state clientele. The politics of old and new social risk coverage in comparative perspective. In Armingeon, K. & Bonoli, G. (Eds.), The politics of postindustrial welfare states. Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks (pp. 100–122). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baer, L., Eitzen, D. S., Duprey, C., Thompson, N. J., & Cole, C. (1976). The consequences of objective and subjective status inconsistency. The Sociological Quarterly, 17(3), 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: Towards transnational capitalism in central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30(3), 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe's periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2015). Educational attainment – relative or absolute – as a mediator of intergenerational class mobility in Britain. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J. H., Waller, L., & Kuha, J. (2015). The mobility problem in Britain: New findings from the analysis of birth cohort data. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busemeyer, M. R. (2012). Inequality and the political economy of education: An analysis of individual preferences in OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, M. R., Goerres, A., & Weschle, S. (2009). Attitudes towards redistributive spending in an era of demographic ageing: The rival pressures from age and income in 14 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(3), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 879–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A., & D'Angelo, E. (2010). Upward social mobility, well-being and political preferences: Evidence from the BHPS (Working Paper, Nr. 338). Ancona: Universitá Politecnica delle Marche.Google Scholar
Cojocaru, A. (2014). Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from the life in transition survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabalen, A., Parinduri, R. A., & Paul, S. (2015). The effects of the intensity, timing and persistence of personal history of mobility on support for redistribution in transition countries. Economics of Transition, 23(3), 565–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duman, A. (2009). Preferences for unemployment insurance and labor-market risks: Over-time developments in Germany and the United States. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 25(3), 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duru-Bellat, M., & Kieffer, A. (2008). Objective/subjective: The two facets of social mobility. Sociologie Du Travail, 50(0), e1–e18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EBRD. (2010). Life in transition survey. Aggregated database. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. (1984). Social class of men, women and families. Sociology, 18(4), 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2004). Untying the Gordian knot of social inheritance. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 21, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EVS. (2010). European values study 2008: Integrated dataset (EVS 2008). GESIS data archive, Cologne, Germany, ZA4800 Data File Version 3.0.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenger, H. (2007). Welfare regimes in central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating post-communist countries in a welfare regime typology. Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences, 3(2), 3–30. Retrieved from http://journal.ciiss.net/index.php/ciiss/article/viewArticle/45Google Scholar
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Understanding – and misunderstanding – social mobility in Britain: The entry of the economists, the confusion of politicians and the limits of educational policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42(3), 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graaf, N. D. De, Nieuwbeerta, P., & Heath, A. (1995). Class mobility and political preferences: Individual and contextual effects. American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 997–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugushvili, A. (2010). Towards a welfare research framework in the countries of eastern partnership initiative. Journal of East European and Asian Studies, 1(3), 351–381.Google Scholar
Gugushvili, A. (2014). Trends, covariates and consequences of intergenerational social mobility in post-socialist societies. Political and Social Sciences. European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Gugushvili, A. (2015a). Economic liberalization and intergenerational mobility in occupational status. Comparative Sociology, 14(6), 790–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugushvili, A. (2015b). Self-interest, perceptions of transition and welfare preferences in the new Eastern Europe and the south Caucasus. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(5), 718–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillaud, E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis over 33 countries. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habibov, N. (2012a). Income inequality and its driving forces in transitional countries: Evidence from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 28(3), 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habibov, N. (2012b). Who wants to redistribute? An analysis of 14 post-soviet nations. Social Policy & Administration, 47(3), 262–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habibov, N. (2016). Effect of corruption on healthcare satisfaction in post-soviet nations: A cross-country instrumental variable analysis of twelve countries. Social Science & Medicine, 152, 119–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglot, T. (2013). Western welfare states watched from the east during the cold war: Condemnation, competition, and creative learning. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29(3), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, J. P., & Leoni, E. L. (2007). Using graphs instead of tables in political science. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, S. M. C., & Kelley, C. G. E. (2009). Subjective social mobility: Data from 30 nations. In Haller, M., Jowell, R., & Smith, T. (Eds.), Charting the globe: The international social survey programme 1984-2009 (pp. 106–124). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kluegel, J. R., & Mason, D. S. (2004). Fairness matters: Social justice and political legitimacy in post-communist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 56(6), 813–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluegel, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Wegener, B. (1995). Social justice and political change: Public opinion in capitalist and post-communist states. New York: Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreidl, M. (2000). Perceptions of poverty and wealth in western and post-communist countries. Social Justice Research, 13(2), 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leventoglu, B. (2013). Social mobility, middle class, and political transitions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(5), 825–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linos, K., & West, M. (2003). Self-interest, social beliefs, and attitudes to redistribution. Re-addressing the issue of cross-national variation. European Sociological Review, 19(4), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1992). Foreword: The political consequences of social mobility. In Turner, F. C. (Ed.), Social mobility and political attitudes: Comparative perspectives (pp. XV–XXIII). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Lipsmeyer, C. S. (2004). Welfare and the discriminating public: Evaluating entitlement attitudes in post-communist Europe. Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 545–564. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/psj/2003/00000031/00000004/art00004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, G., & Firth, D. (1999). Social mobility and personal satisfaction: Evidence from ten countries. The British Journal of Sociology, 50(1), 28–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murthi, M., & Tiongson, E. R. (2009). Attitudes to income equality: The ‘socialist legacy’ revisited. Comparative Economic Studies, 51(3), 344–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkin, F. (1973). Class inequality and political order: Social stratification in capitalist and communist societies. London: Paladin.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 551–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabbagh, C., & Vanhuysse, P. (2006). Exploring attitudes towards the welfare state: Students’ views in eight democracies. Journal of Social Policy, 35(4), 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A. (2011). The experience of social mobility and the formation of attitudes toward redistribution (GK SOCLIFE Working Papers Series 6/2001). Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Segura, D. A. (1989). Chicana and Mexican immigrant women at work: The impact of class, race, and gender on occupational mobility. Gender and Society, 3(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R., & Zwier, S. M. (1997). Social cognition. In Berry, J. W., Segall, M. H., & Kagitçibasi, C. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology – volume 3: Social behavior and applications (Vol. 3, pp. 51–75). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Shariff, A. F. (2015). Does religion increase moral behavior? Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirazi, R., & Biel, A. (2005). Internal-external causal attributions and perceived government responsibility for need provision: A 14-culture study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(1), 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siedler, T., & Sonnenberg, B. (2012). Intergenerational earnings mobility and preferences for redistribution. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swift, A. (2004). Would perfect mobility be perfect? European Sociological Review, 20(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, F. C. (1992). Social mobility and political attitudes in comparative perspective. In Turner, F. C. (Ed.), Social mobility and political attitudes: Comparative perspectives (pp. 1–20). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Veraschagina, A. (2012). Chapter 4: Education and socioeconomic mobility in post-communist countries. In Parodi, G. & Sciulli, D. (Eds.), Social exclusion: Short and long term causes and consequences (p. 67). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbakel, E. (2012). Leisure values of Europeans from 46 countries. European Sociological Review, 29(3), 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegener, B. (1991). Relative deprivation and social mobility: Structural constraints on distributive justice judgments. European Sociological Review, 7(1), 3–18. Retrieved from http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/content/7/1/3.abstractCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegren, S. K., O'Brien, D. J., & Patsiorkovski, V. V. (2006). Social mobility in rural Russia, 1995–2003. Journal of Peasant Studies, 33(2), 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, M. K. (2010). Fair versus unfair: How do Chinese citizens view current inequalities? In Oi, J. C., Rozelle, S., & Zhou, X. (Eds.), Growing pains: Tensions and opportunity in China's transformation (pp. 305–332). Stanford: Shorenstein Center.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L., & Edwards, H. (1959). The skidder: Ideological adjustments of downward mobile workers. American Sociological Review, 24(2), 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed