Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:55:12.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The liberalisation of India's labour laws within the National Manufacturing Policy 2011: where business power and social policy collide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Katherine Running
Katherine Running*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
*
*Emails: k.running@sheffield.ac.uk, kathrunning@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following formal economic liberalisation in 1991, business, in particular big business, has gained increasing access to and influence over policy decision-making in India. Industry has been an outspoken critic of national labour laws and has lobbied extensively for greater labour market flexibility. While business has not been successful in influencing “official” labour reform at the national level, it was able to influence labour policy within the National Manufacturing Policy 2011, which curtailed labour protections and implemented “hire and fire” policies. Utilising qualitative data from 40 face-to-face interviews with policy stakeholders in New Delhi, India, this paper aims to explore how business was able to influence labour reform within this policy as well as underscore the wider social welfare implications that may follow. It will be argued that the ability of business to dictate labour reform, while strong, is somewhat variable as competing factors serve to constrain business influence. Furthermore, the extent to which labour laws are hindering manufacturing investment is widely debatable. Nevertheless, curtailment of labour protections, as afforded in this policy, will have a widespread and damaging impact on workers. While the policy promises to empower rural youth, provide gainful employment, and enable growth to become more sustainable and inclusive for its citizens, it is questionable whether these goals can be achieved alongside the curtailment of labour protections.

Keywords

Indialiberalisationlabour reformNational Manufacturing Policybusiness power
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 2: Meeting Emerging Global Policy Challenges: Positioning Social Policy Between Development and Growth? , June 2015 , pp. 192 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anant, T. C. A., Hasan, R., Mohapatra, P., Nagaraj, R., & Sasikumar, S. K. (2006). Labor markets in India: Issues and perspectives. In Felipe, J. & Hasan, R. (Eds.), Labor market in Asia: Issues and perspectives part III (pp. 205–300). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004). Can labour regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharjea, A. (2006). Labour market regulation and industrial performance in India: A critical review of the empirical evidence. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 49(2), 211–232.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, S. (2007). Vicissitudes of the relationship between state, labour, and capital: An appraisal of neoliberal labour market reforms in India and beyond. Labour, Capital & Society, 40(1/2), 106–124.Google Scholar
Binswanger-Mkhize, H. (2013). The stunted structural transformation of the Indian Economy: Agriculture, manufacturing and the rural non-farm sector. Economic and Political Weekly, xlviII(26 & 27), 5–13.Google Scholar
Cameron, R. (1993). A concise economic history of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, S. (2011). Employment in India: What does the latest data show? Employment and Political Weekly, XLVI (32), 23–26.Google Scholar
Dutta Roy, S. (2004). Employment dynamics in Indian industry: Adjustment lags and the impact of job security regulations. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion (DIPP): Government of India. (2011). National Manufacturing Policy. Press Note No. 2 (2011 Series). New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, B., Gupta, P., & Kumar, R. (2010). Emerging giants: China and India in the world economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, P., & Lucas, R. (1991). The impact of changes in job security regulations in India and Zimbabwe. World Bank Economic Review, 5(3), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2004). Corporate power and social policy in a global economy: British welfare under the influence. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2010). Business power, social policy preferences and development. In Marques, J. C. & Utting, P. (Eds.), Business, politics and public policy (pp. 63–89). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, K. (2012). Social versus corporate welfare: Competing needs and interests within the welfare state. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, D. (2005). Understanding business power in global governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Ghosh, J. (2011). Poverty reduction in China and India: Policy implications of recent trends. In Poor poverty: The impoverishment of analysis, measurement and policies (pp. 111–148). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Gough, I., & Farnsworth, K. (2000). The enhanced structural power of capital: A review and assessment. In Global capital, human needs and social policies (pp. 77–104). Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2002). Business power and social policy: Employers and the formation of the American welfare state. Politics and Society, 30(2), 277–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, A. (2005). Labour laws and industrial relations. In Debroy, D. & Kaushik, P. (Eds.), Reforming the labour market (pp. 137–172). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
Kohli, A. (2012). Poverty amid plenty in the New India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. O. (2009). The missing middle (working paper 230). New Delhi: Indian Council for Economic Research on International Economic Relations.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Rate, structure, and spread. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. W. (1955). The theory of economic growth. Homewood: Richard Irwin.Google Scholar
Mander, H. 2014. Labour reforms of the wrong kind: India needs to amend its labour laws. Not to destroy the weak safeguards that exist now but to strengthen them Mint [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/7ubbAhx2Q8HIsWDg1KrNII/Harsh-Mander–Labour-reforms-of-the-wrong-kind.htmlGoogle Scholar
Marques, J. C., & Utting, P. (2010). Introduction: Understanding business power and public policy in a development context. In Marques, J. C. & Utting, P. (Eds.), Business, politics, and public policy (pp. 1–29). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazumdar, D., & Sarkar, S. (2008). Globalization, labour markets and inequality in India. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mazumdar, S. (2011). Continuity and change in Indian capitalism (pp. 1–44). New Delhi: Ambedkar University.Google Scholar
Murali, K. (2010). Liberalization, business–state relations and labour policy in India. In Marques, J. C. & Utting, P. (Eds.), Business, politics and public policy (pp. 90–109). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagaraj, R. (2004). Fall in organised manufacturing employment: a brief note. Economic and Political Weekly, 39, 24–30.Google Scholar
National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO). (2010). Employment and unemployment situation in India (NSS 66th round). New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
Papola, T. (2005). Emerging structure of the Indian Economy: Implications of growing intersectoral imbalances. New Delhi: Institute for Studies on Industrial Development.Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. D. (2008). Globalization, development and the state: The performance of India and Brazil since 1990. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planning Commission of India. (Government of India) (2013). Twelfth five year plan (2012–2017): Faster, more inclusive and sustainable growth. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. (2006). Flexibility, employment and labour market reforms in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 41, 2078–2085.Google Scholar
Sood, A., Nath, P., & Ghosh, S. (2014). Deregulating capital, regulating labour: The dynamics in the manufacturing sector in India. Economics & Political Weekly, 49(26/27), 58–68.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. P. (2011). Investment incentives and the global competition for capital. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNCTAD. (2013). World investment report 2013 global value chains: Investment and trade for development. New York and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Varshney, A. (1998). Mass politics or elite politics? India's economic reforms in comparative perspective. The Journal of Policy Reform, 2(4), 301–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2014). Data: Rural population (% of total population). Retrieved January 4, 2014, from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZSGoogle Scholar