Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:23:46.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Varieties of Asian welfare capitalisms and the influence of globalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Hironori Tohyama
Hironori Tohyama*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Japan
*
*Email: jehthoy@ipc.shizuoka.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Asian welfare capitalisms as well as advanced economies face the risks associated with globalization. In order to understand how Asian welfare capitalisms respond to globalization, it is essential to describe the institutional diversity of Asian welfare capitalisms and the welfare–risk nexus. This paper defines four types of Asian welfare capitalisms based on social spending data and investigates the welfare–risk nexus by focusing on globalization risks, such as a globalized production process, trade openness, and financial integration. The empirical results based on multiple factor analysis and cluster analysis clearly show that Asian welfare capitalisms are heterogeneous and that four clusters can be found in the welfare–risk nexus based on the dimensions present in Asian economies in the 2000s. This analysis stresses that globalization has different effects on these types of Asian welfare capitalisms according to their welfare–risk nexuses.

Keywords

Asian economiesvarieties of capitalismglobalizationwelfare capitalisminstitutionmultiple factor analysiscluster analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 51 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdi, H., & Valentin, D. (2007). Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA). In Salkind, N. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (pp. 657–663). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ahn, S-H., & Lee, S. S. (2012). Explaining Korean welfare state development with new empirical data and methods. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 6, 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2011). Trade and Industrialisation after Globalisation's 2nd Unbundling: How Building and Joining a Supply Chain are Different and why it Matters (NBER Working Paper, No. 17716). Cambridge, MA: NBER.Google Scholar
Bécue-Bertaut, M., & Pagès, S. (2008). Multiple factor analysis and clustering of a mixture of quantitative, categorical and frequency data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52, 3255–3268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, E. E., & Williamson, J. G. (1998). Demographic transitions and economic miracles in emerging Asia. The World Bank Economic Review, 12(3), 419–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, O., Gereffi, G., Miroudot, S., & Taglioni, M. D. (2013). Joining, upgrading and being competitive in global value chains: A strategic framework (Policy Research Working Paper, 6406). Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. J. (2007). Coming to a standstill: A new theoretical idea of East Asian welfare regimes, Barnett Papers in Social Research, 2007/3. Oxford: Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
De Backer, K., & Sébastien, M. (2013). Mapping global value chains, OECD trade policy paper, No.159. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, M. (2008). Welfare and capitalism in postwar Japan. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukakusa, K., Meng, B., & Yamano, M. (2011). Recent development in Asian economic integration: Measuring indicators of trade and fragmentation (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2011/03). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. (2001). Globalization and Government spending around the world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(4), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handayani, S. W., & Babajanian, B. (2012). Social protection for older persons: Social pensions in Asia. Manila: ADB.Google Scholar
Harada, Y., & Tohyama, H. (2011). Asian capitalisms: Institutional configurations and firm heterogeneity. In Boyer, R., Uemura, H., & Isogai, A. (Eds.), Diversity and transformations of Asian capitalisms (pp. 243–263). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48(4), 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, I., & Wilding, P. (Eds.). (2003). Welfare capitalism in East Asia: Social policy in the tiger economies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J., & Kühner, S. (2009). Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries.Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDE-JETRO & WTO. (2011). Trade patterns and global value chains in East Asia: From trade in goods to trade in tasks. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. (2005). Capitalism, democracy and welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, H-J. (2005). Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Development and Change, 36(3), 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. S. (2010). The shift of labour market risks in deindustrializing Asian Economies: Taiwan, Japan and the Republic of Korea, Barnett Papers in Social Research, 2/2010. Oxford: Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Lee, Y-J., & Ku, Y-W. (2007). East Asian welfare regimes: Testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state. Social Policy & Administration, 41(2), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lue, J-D., & Park, C. (2013). Beyond productivist social policy: The East Asian welfare–work nexus in transition. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 6(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, C., & Jung, D. (2009). Making sense of the Asian welfare regimes’. Korean Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 57–85.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudra, N. (2002). Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less-developed countries. International Organization, 56(2), 411–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudra, N. (2007). Welfare states in developing countries: Unique or universal? Journal of Politics, 69(2), 378–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, S., & Slaughter, M. J. (2004). Economic insecurity and the globalization of production. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruggs, (2007). Welfare state generosity across space and time. In Clasen, J. & Siegel, N. (Eds.), Investigating welfare state change (pp. 133–166). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Thorbecke, W., & Salike, N. (2011). Understanding foreign direct investment in East Asia (ADB Working Paper Series, 290). Manila: ADB.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, E. (2006). Dependency revisited: International markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization, 60, 433–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibbels, E., & Ahlquist, J. S. (2011). Development, trade, and social insurance. International Studies Quarterly, 55, 125–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar