Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:20:39.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Algebraic K-theory and cyclic homology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

Jean-Louis Loday
Jean-Louis Loday*
Affiliation:
Institut de Recherche Mathématique Avancée, CNRS et Université de Strasbourg, 7 rue R. Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, FranceLODAY@MATH.UNISTRA.FR
Get access

Extract

The following are personal reminiscences of my research years in algebraic K-theory and cyclic homology during which Dan Quillen was everyday present in my professional life.

In the late sixties (of the twentieth century) the groups K0;K1;K2 were known and well-studied. The group K0 had been introduced by Alexander Grothendieck, then came K1 by Hyman Bass [2] (as a variation of the Whitehead group), permitting one to generalize the notion of determinant, and finally K2 by John Milnor [9] and Michel Kervaire. The big problem was: how about Kn? Having in mind topological K-theory and all the other generalized (co)homological theories, one was expecting higher K-groups which satisfy similar axioms, in particular the Mayer-Vietoris exact sequence. The discovery by Richard Swan of the existence of an obstruction for this property to hold shed some embarrassment. What kind of properties should we ask of Kn? There were various attempts, for instance by Max Karoubi and Orlando Villamayor [4]. And suddenly Dan Quillen came with a candidate sharing a lot of nice properties. He had even two different constructions of the same object: the “+” construction and the “Q” construction [14, 15]. Not only did he propose a candidate but he already got a computation: the higher K-theory of finite fields. This was a fantastic step forward and Hyman Bass organized a two week conference at the Battelle Institute in Seattle during the summer of 1972, which was attended by Bass, Borel, Husemoller, Karoubi, Priddy, Quillen, Segal, Stasheff, Tate, Waldhausen, Wall and sixty other mathematicians. The Proceedings appeared as Springer Lecture Notes 341, 342 and 343. I met Quillen for the first time on this occasion.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of K-Theory , Volume 11 , Issue 3: The Legacy of Daniel Quillen , June 2013 , pp. 553 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © ISOPP 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.André, Michel, Homologie des algèbres commutatives, Grund. Math. Wiss. 206, Springer Verlag, 1974.Google Scholar
2.Bass, Hyman, Algebraic K-theory. W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York-Amsterdam 1968 xx+762 pp.Google Scholar
3.Connes, Alain, Noncommutative differential geometry. Inst. Hautes Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. 62 (1985), 257–360.Google Scholar
4.Karoubi, Max; Villamayor, Orlando Foncteurs Kn en algèbre et en topologie. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B 269 (1969), A416–A419.Google Scholar
5.Loday, Jean-Louis, K-théorie algèbrique et représentations de groupes. Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 9 (1976), no. 3, 309–377.Google Scholar
6.Loday, Jean-Louis; Quillen, Daniel G., Homologie cyclique et homologie de l'algèbre de Lie des matrices. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 296 (1983), no. 6, 295–297.Google Scholar
7.Loday, Jean-Louis; Quillen, Daniel G., Cyclic homology and the Lie algebra homology of matrices. Comment. Math. Helv. 59 (1984), no. 4, 569–591.Google Scholar
8.Loday, Jean-Louis; Vallette Bruno, Algebraic operads, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 346, Springer, Heidelberg, 2012.Google Scholar
9.Milnor, John, Introduction to algebraic K-theory. Annals of Mathematics Studies 72, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.; University of Tokyo Press, 1971. xiii+184 pp.Google Scholar
10.Quillen, Daniel G., Spectral sequences of a double semi-simplicial group. Topology 5 (1966), 155–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Quillen, Daniel G., Homology of commutative rings. Mimeographed Notes, MIT.Google Scholar
12.Quillen, Daniel G., On the (co-) homology of commutative rings. 1970 Applications of Categorical Algebra (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. XVII, New York, 1968) pp. 65–87. A.M.S.Google Scholar
13.Quillen, Daniel G., The Adams conjecture. Topology 10 (1971), 67–80.Google Scholar
14.Quillen, Daniel G., Cohomology of groups. Actes du Congrès International des Mathématiciens (Nice, 1970), Tome 2, pp. 47–51, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1971.Google Scholar
15.Quillen, Daniel G., Higher algebraic K-theory. I. Algebraic K-theory, I: Higher K-theories (Proc. Conf., Battelle Memorial Inst., Seattle, Wash., 1972), pp. 85–147. Lecture Notes in Math. 341, Springer, Berlin, 1973.Google Scholar
16.Quillen, Daniel G., K 0 for nonunital rings and Morita invariance. J. Reine Angew. Math. 472 (1996), 197–217.Google Scholar
17.Tsygan, Boris L., Homology of matrix Lie algebras over rings and the Hochschild homology. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 38 (1983), no. 2(230), 217–218.Google Scholar