Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the most common head and neck cancer in southern China, occurring more frequently in Southeast Asia than elsewhere. The annual incidence of NPC in Southern China is about 30 cases per 100 000 people.Reference Cao, Simons and Qian1 The retropharyngeal lymph nodes, an extensive lymphatic network, are widely considered the first-echelon lymph nodes for the nasopharynx.Reference Liu, Zhang, Xie, Liu, Cui and Li2 Therefore, metastatic retropharyngeal lymph nodes are a common phenomenon in NPC patients, with an incidence rate of 64.2–75.1 per cent.Reference Tang, Guo, Zhou, Sun, Liu and Lin3–Reference Huang, Zhang, Liu, Li, Wang and Liang5 In the eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control staging system, retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis was classified as nodal N1 stage.Reference Huang, Zhang, Liu, Li, Wang and Liang5 The occurrence of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis was considered an unfavourable prognostic factor in NPC patients.Reference Chen, Zhan, Pan, Xiao, Tang and Guo6
Radiotherapy is the mainstay treatment for primary NPCs, as it is sensitive to radiation. The target areas usually also include metastatic retropharyngeal lymph nodes.Reference Chen, Chan, Le, Blanchard, Sun and Ma7 However, re-irradiation is not ideal for retropharyngeal lymph node recurrence because of radioresistance and severe radiotoxicity. In addition, the adjacent normal tissues have already absorbed radiation doses near tolerance from previous radiotherapy. Therefore, salvage treatment of recurrent or residual retropharyngeal lymph nodes is more challenging and complicated than primary retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis.
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for recurrent NPC recommend surgery as a first-line salvage treatment for patients with resectable tumours.Reference Pfister, Spencer, Adelstein, Adkins, Anzai and Brizel8 Compared to re-irradiation, surgery can improve local control and increase survival rates without causing major long-term complications. Resection of masses in the retropharyngeal space is complex because of its anatomical complexity and proximity to the internal carotid artery. Retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy for recurrent or residual retropharyngeal lymph nodes in NPC is more difficult than in other tumours because of the local reaction after radiation. As a result, such operations are performed only in a few hospitals.
Retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy of retropharyngeal lymph nodes in NPC patients has been reported in only a few articles.Reference Chan, Chow, Wong and Wei9–Reference Liu, Wang, Zou, You, Yang and Zhang11 The transcervical and maxillary swing approaches are traditionally used for retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy in NPC patients. However, the transcervical approach requires a long path to access the lesion. Moreover, injury to the lower cranial nerves and pharyngocutaneous fistulas may sometimes occur. The maxillary swing approach can cause serious surgical complications such as facial scarring, trismus, palatal defect, dysphagia, osteomyelitis and osteonecrosis. Recently, the transcervical endoscopic approach and transoral robotic retropharyngeal lymph node dissection have been developed.Reference Ding, Lin, Zou, Liu, Hua and Xie10,Reference Liu, Wang, Zou, You, Yang and Zhang11 Although the transcervical endoscopic approach is assisted by endoscopy, nerve injury and pharyngeal fistulas are still common.Reference Liu, Wang, Zou, You, Yang and Zhang11 For transoral robotic retropharyngeal lymph node dissection, it is sometimes difficult to precisely locate the retropharyngeal lymph node. Furthermore, high medical costs, a lack of tactile sense, the amount of time needed, a lack of robotic equipment, and the extensive hand–eye co-ordination training required prevent the widespread adoption of surgical robotics.Reference Iavazzo, Papadopoulou and Gkegkes12
This study introduces a novel endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach, for a minimally invasive procedure with fewer complications, for retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy in NPC patients. We first demonstrate the relevant details in a step-by-step anatomical study. Furthermore, we present our early experience in managing six cases, to aid understanding of the technical nuances.
Materials and methods
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University. Eight sides of four fresh cadaveric heads were dissected for the anatomical study, after injecting coloured liquid silicone into the arterial and venous beds (red and blue, respectively). Endoscopic endonasal surgery instruments (Storz Endoscopy, Tuttlingen, Germany) and the Coblator Surgery System (ArthroCare, Sunnyvale, California, USA) were used for dissection and surgical procedures. The procedures were performed using a 0° endoscope (Karl Storz; 4 mm diameter, 18 cm length) connected to a high-definition camera for visualisation and recording.
Anatomical dissections
At the beginning of the dissection, a Davis mouth gag was used to open the month and expose the lateral wall of the oropharynx. A vertical mucosal and submucosal incision was made medial to the pterygomandibular fold on the soft palate with a knife blade. The fascia and the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle were dissected. The muscles, fat tissues, vessels and nerves in the parapharyngeal space were then exposed and identified. Finally, the retropharyngeal space was exposed. Anatomical structures were photographed and recorded.
Case series
This study included six nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with retropharyngeal lymph node recurrence, who were treated at the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University from July 2021 to December 2021. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including gender, age, history, treatments, radiographic findings, retropharyngeal lymph node size, internal carotid artery involvement, balloon occlusion test findings, surgical approaches, complications, pathological findings and follow-up results.
The extent of the tumour and its relationship with the adjacent vital structures were evaluated by pre-operative computed tomography and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plus magnetic resonance angiography. Enhanced MRI images were obtained on the 1st post-operative day to evaluate the extent of resection following surgery.
All patients were fully informed about the surgical procedures and associated risks. Furthermore, they were informed and counselled about the possible need to convert to external approaches.
Results
Anatomy
The tissue layers of the mucosa and submucosa were meticulously separated to reveal the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle and the pterygomandibular raphe in every specimen. Subsequently, the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle was dissected, exposing the prestyloid fat, and the ascending palatine artery, along with its branches located in the prestyloid space. The tensor veli palatini muscle and the pterygoid hamulus were revealed superiorly, whereas the medial pterygoid muscle was shown laterally. The fat and vascular vessels were removed to reveal the styloglossal muscle and the stylopharyngeal muscle in the prestyloid space's lower portion. The carotid sheath was evident immediately behind the stylopharyngeal muscle. The process continued posteriorly along the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle's lateral surface, exposing the longus capitis muscle. Following the dissection of the carotid sheath, both the internal carotid artery (ICA) and ascending pharyngeal artery were exposed. The retropharyngeal lymph node was then identified, lying between the longus capitis muscle and the ICA. The subsequent resection of the retropharyngeal lymph node and the lateral displacement of the ICA revealed the cervical sympathetic trunk situated posteriorly to the ICA (Figure 1).
Case series
The basic demographic and clinical characteristics of the included cases are shown in Table 1. Each patient had a history of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and had undergone radiotherapy with chemotherapy. The interval between retropharyngeal lymph node recurrence and the original diagnosis of NPC ranged from 12 to 32 months, with a mean interval of 18 months. Patient number four also underwent two other surgical procedures because of tumour recurrence in the nasopharynx; the first procedure was an endoscopic endonasal extended nasopharyngectomy repaired with a temporalis muscle flap, and the second procedure was an endoscopic endonasal extended nasopharyngectomy.
* Interval between retropharyngeal lymph node recurrence and the original diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. No. = number; RPLN = retropharyngeal lymph node; ICA = internal carotid artery; rTNM = recurrent tumour–node–metastasis; NG = nasogastric; post-op = post-operative; F = female; R = right; L = left; LN = lymph node; NED = no evidence of disease; M = male; B = bilateral
Enhanced MRI plus magnetic resonance angiography scans demonstrated that the minimal axial diameter of retropharyngeal lymph node was 6 mm or larger except in case six (5.6 mm). All enlarged retropharyngeal lymph nodes were closely related to the ICAs. The ipsilateral ICA in case two was encased by the retropharyngeal lymph node. The recurrent tumours were staged as shown in Table 1, according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for NPC.
The ipsilateral balloon occlusion test was performed under local anaesthesia in the hybrid operating theatre. The balloon occlusion test results were negative in all six patients. The balloon guiding catheter was reserved in the common carotid artery in case of an ICA blowout. The surgical procedures were then performed with the patient lying supine with oral tracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.
All the patients underwent retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy through the endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach. Two patients with a recurrent tumour in the nasopharynx were treated with extended nasopharyngectomy, and the surgical field was reconstructed with a pedicled nasoseptal flap before retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy was performed. All retropharyngeal lymph nodes were successfully located during surgery and removed. In five cases, en bloc retropharyngeal lymph node resection was performed. However, because of severe adhesion to the ICA, an intracapsular resection was executed only in case five. Post-operative imaging confirmed the complete resection of retropharyngeal lymph nodes in each case. Pathological analysis revealed retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in five cases, with the sixth case presenting reactive lymph node hyperplasia. There was no need for transition to an external surgical approach in any of the cases. For two patients, a nasogastric feeding tube was retained for a fortnight. All patients were extubated post-operatively, with none requiring a tracheostomy.
Patients responded favourably to the surgical procedures, and tolerability was satisfactory. A slight effusion within the surgical cavity was observed in most patients in the initial post-operative days, but this resolved without additional intervention, excluding the first case. This patient (case one) required drainage of the effusion after four weeks; however, the bacterial cultures of the effusion did not show colony growth. Horner syndrome was identified in the second case, but conservative treatment strategies led to recovery within a month. Overall, patients’ recovery was notable, with no significant post-operative complications reported. Furthermore, no recurrence instances were recorded during a follow-up period ranging from 7 to 12 months.
Illustrative cases
This section describes retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy using an endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold procedure.
Figure 2 shows the example of case two, in which pre-operative enhanced MRI showed an enlarged left retropharyngeal lymph node located between the longus capitis muscle and the ICA (Figures 2a and b). In the first stage of the operation, a Davis mouth gag was used to open the mouth and expose the lateral wall of the oropharynx. Then, a vertical incision was made medially to the pterygomandibular fold with an electric needle. The superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle was exposed and dissected to expose the parapharyngeal space. The prestyloid fat was removed, and the medial pterygoid muscle, superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle, styloid muscle group (stylopharyngeal muscle and styloglossal muscle) and levator veli palatini muscle were exposed laterally, medially, inferiorly and superiorly, respectively. The ascending palatine artery was revealed between the styloglossal muscle and the stylopharyngeal muscle. It was blocked with bipolar cautery. The dissection was continued posteriorly along the lateral surface of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle to expose the longus capitis muscle, which indicated the medial margin of the retropharyngeal lymph node. The carotid sheath was dissected to expose the ICA and the lateral margin of the retropharyngeal lymph node. The ascending pharyngeal artery was then coagulated. The retropharyngeal lymph node was separated and resected from the surrounding tissues. The incision of the soft palate was sutured in three layers, including the mucosa, submucosal tissue and the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle; they were sutured in a mattress fashion. Complete tumour excision was confirmed by post-operative enhanced MRI on the 1st post-operative day.
The procedures of other patients were similar to that described above. Figures 3 and 4 show the pre-operative imaging, surgical procedures and post-operative imaging examinations of another two illustrative cases (cases one and six, respectively), demonstrating all the anatomical landmarks of this approach. The pre- and post-operative enhanced MRI scans confirmed total resection of the retropharyngeal lymph nodes.
Discussion
Retropharyngeal space is anteriorly bound by buccopharyngeal fascia, posteriorly by alar fascia, laterally by carotid sheath,Reference Coskun, Ferlito, Medina, Robbins, Rodrigo and Strojan13,Reference Ozlugedik, Ibrahim Acar, Apaydin, Firat Esmer, Tekdemir and Elhan14 superiorly by the skull base and inferiorly by the space that continues to the level of vertebra C3 at its caudal extent.Reference Coskun, Ferlito, Medina, Robbins, Rodrigo and Strojan13 It communicates with the parapharyngeal space anterolaterally.Reference Ding, Lin, Zou, Liu, Hua and Xie10 The retropharyngeal lymph nodes lie in the retropharyngeal space medial to the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the sympathetic trunk.Reference Ozlugedik, Ibrahim Acar, Apaydin, Firat Esmer, Tekdemir and Elhan14,Reference Hasegawa and Matsuura15 They are traditionally divided into two groups: medial and lateral. The lateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes, which are also called Rouvière lymph nodes, are frequently located at the level of the transverse process of the atlas,Reference Rouvière16 and almost all lateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes in patients with nasopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma are located above the level of the axis (the second cervical vertebra).Reference Chong, Fan and Khoo17 The medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes are located medial to the lateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes and consist of two groups: upper and lower.Reference Hasegawa and Matsuura15 Metastatic lateral retropharyngeal lymph nodes can normally be found. On conventional imaging, the medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes are usually small and not visible.Reference Gross, Ellingson, Wax, Cohen and Andersen18 The presence of medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes is generally considered pathological.Reference Coskun, Ferlito, Medina, Robbins, Rodrigo and Strojan13,Reference Mancuso, Harnsberger, Muraki and Stevens19
In retropharyngeal lymph nodes, afferent vessels originate from the ethmoid and sphenoid sinuses, posterior nasal cavity, nasopharynx, posterior pharyngeal wall, and hard and soft palate. These areas are located near the retropharyngeal lymph nodes. The afferent vessels of retropharyngeal lymph nodes also originate from the posterior capsule of the thyroid gland, the post-cricoid area and the cervical oesophagus, some distance from the retropharyngeal lymph nodes.Reference Hasegawa and Matsuura15 Therefore, retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis can result from almost any head and neck malignancy.Reference Hasegawa and Matsuura15,Reference Morrissey, Talbot, Cohen, Wax and Andersen20–Reference Ferlito, Shaha and Rinaldo22 The most common primary tumour that leads to retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis is nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Reference Coskun, Ferlito, Medina, Robbins, Rodrigo and Strojan13 The incidence of retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is between 4.4 and 44.1 per cent.Reference Ferlito, Shaha and Rinaldo22
Retropharyngeal lymph nodes are not routinely dissected in the classical radical, modified or selective neck dissections,Reference Coskun, Ferlito, Medina, Robbins, Rodrigo and Strojan13 mainly because it is very challenging. The retropharyngeal lymph nodes were occasionally dissected in continuity with the resection of the primary tumour by a partial or total pharyngectomy or a mandibulotomy, such as oropharyngeal and hypopharynx malignancies.Reference Coskun, Ferlito, Medina, Robbins, Rodrigo and Strojan13,Reference Butta, Lombardi, Marconi and Nicolai23,Reference Teshima, Otsuki, Shinomiya, Morita, Furukawa and Morimoto24 There is currently no safe, minimally invasive or efficient way to resect retropharyngeal lymph nodes, and no way to avoid significant post-operative complications, regardless of whether procedures are open or robotic.Reference Chan, Chow, Wong and Wei9,Reference Ding, Lin, Zou, Liu, Hua and Xie10,Reference Togashi, Sugitani, Toda, Kawabata and Takahashi25
This study introduced a novel approach for retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy: the endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach. To our knowledge, the endoscopic transoral approach for retropharyngeal lymph nodes recurrence in NPC has not been reported previously. This approach was performed via the prestyloid space, a natural anatomical space exclusively containing fat tissues.Reference Katori, Kawase, Cho, Abe, Rodriguez-Vazquez and Murakami26 Therefore, no bones or other significant structures need to be removed using this approach. The primary surgical technique used in this approach was accurate dissection. The transoral approach provides adequate surgical space for instruments, reduces the risk of injury to vital structures, and causes minimal functional and cosmetic impairments.Reference Maglione, Guida, Pavone, Longo, Aversa and Villano27 The endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach is nearly vertical to the coronal plane, and can expose both the retropharyngeal lymph node and ICA in the same surgical field. Complete dissection and en bloc resection of retropharyngeal lymph nodes can be achieved, which is challenging for traditional approaches.Reference Oikawa, Michi, Tsushima, Tomioka, Mochizuki and Kugimoto28
Accurate localisation of retropharyngeal lymph nodes and protection of the ICA are two main aspects of retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy.Reference Oikawa, Michi, Tsushima, Tomioka, Mochizuki and Kugimoto28 There are only a few reports on methods of intra-operative localisation of retropharyngeal lymph nodes. The present study showed that the stylopharyngeal muscle, longus capitis muscle and ICA could be used as landmarks to locate retropharyngeal lymph nodes. Retropharyngeal lymph nodes have been reported to be posterior to the stylopharyngeal muscle, and the stylopharyngeal muscle is the most vertical and medial of the three styloid muscles.Reference Ozlugedik, Ibrahim Acar, Apaydin, Firat Esmer, Tekdemir and Elhan14,Reference Prades, Gavid, Asanau, Timoshenko, Richard and Martin29 Our results revealed that dissection posteriorly along the lateral surface of the superior pharyngeal constrictor muscle could reveal the longus capitis muscle. In the surgery, the retropharyngeal lymph node was located anterolaterally to the longus capitis muscle, which served as a reliable landmark to identify the medial margin of the retropharyngeal lymph node. Laterally, the retropharyngeal lymph node was adjacent to the ICA, which was used as a landmark for locating the lateral margin of the retropharyngeal lymph node.
Comprehensive assessment of the ICA was crucial to protect it during surgery, as it is usually adhered to the retropharyngeal lymph node because of radiation, and might be impaired during the procedure. Therefore, it was dangerous to manipulate the ICA rashly without pre-operative evaluation, especially in patients who received re-irradiation.Reference Chen, Wang, Wang, Jiang, Lin and Liu30,Reference McDonald, Moore and Johnstone31 Magnetic resonance angiography before surgery was an efficient method for assessing the morphological variations and stenosis of ICA. The balloon occlusion test of the involved ICA with neuromonitoring could evaluate cerebral ischaemic tolerance and reliance on the ICA.Reference Yang, Wu, Chen, Sun, Hu and Wang32 When the test result was negative, the balloon guiding catheter was reserved and vessel embolisation was prepared in case of an ICA blowout. Before surgery, the extracranial–intracranial vascular bypass was considered, to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure if the balloon occlusion test result was positive and the ICA needed to be resected.
In order to avoid fatal bleeding during surgery, it was also critically important to locate exactly the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA. Several morphological variations of the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA have been reported, including straightness, tortuosity, kinking and coiling.Reference Sun, Yan, Truong, Borghei-Razavi, Snyderman and Fernandez-Miranda33,Reference Paulsen, Tillmann, Christofides, Richter and Koebke34 Given the lack of constant landmarks, it was quite challenging to locate the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA.Reference Sun, Yan, Truong, Borghei-Razavi, Snyderman and Fernandez-Miranda33 The present study showed that a few landmarks could be used to identify the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA: the stylopharyngeal muscle, levator veli palatini muscle and retropharyngeal lymph node. The stylopharyngeal muscle was anterior to the carotid sheath and was a reliable landmark for locating the lower part of the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA, which is consistent with a previous publication.Reference Fang, Di, Zhou and Jiang35 The external orifice of carotid canal was posterior to the attachment site of the levator veli palatini muscle on the inferior surface of the petrosal pyramid, which was a helpful landmark for the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA. As the retropharyngeal lymph node was adjacent to the medial surface of the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA, the enlarged retropharyngeal lymph node itself could be used as a landmark for the parapharyngeal segment of the ICA. During surgery, an ultrasonic Doppler system can also be recommended, to localise the ICA accurately.
The current study demonstrated that the endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach for retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy had a mild effect on the patient's quality of life. No significant post-operative complications were observed. Horner syndrome and effusion in the operative cavity are usually treatable with conservative measures. Horner syndrome has no clear explanation, although stretching of the sympathetic nerve and thermal injuries to the sympathetic nerve of the neck have been speculated. The leading cause of excess effusion in case one was likely due to suturing techniques associated with inexperience with this approach in this first procedure. The wound was stitched with a multi-layer and mucosal mattress suture style without dead space in the cases that followed. Once the suturing techniques had improved, operative drainage was not required. The nasogastric tube could be retained for two weeks to enhance wound healing. None of the patients required a tracheostomy.
• It is challenging to resect masses in the retropharyngeal space given its anatomical complexity and proximity to the internal carotid artery
• Retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy for recurrent or residual retropharyngeal lymph nodes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is difficult because of the local reaction after radiation
• An endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach to salvage retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy in NPC is safe and efficient
The endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach provides shorter access to the retropharyngeal space than the transcervical approach. This approach is less invasive, and the associated morbidity is less significant than with other approaches. Despite the limited number of clinical cases, with short follow-up durations, the early results from our study are reassuring. Future studies should be conducted to confirm the reproducibility and long-term effectiveness of this surgery. We also realise that surgery is not the only treatment available to these patients. Other therapeutic options available include: radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy and combined treatment. Treatment should be comprehensive and personalised according to the clinical characteristics and the patient's preferences. Surgery was decided by a multidisciplinary team for all patients in our series. There was a multidisciplinary approach to patient treatment if needed (data are not published here).
Conclusion
There are challenges associated with retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy using traditional approaches. The endoscopic transoral medial pterygomandibular fold approach is safe and efficient for retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Shuai Li, Jingjin Weng, Shilei Pu and Jiang Su, from the Skull Base Anatomy Laboratory at the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, for their outstanding work providing anatomical research support for the publication of this article. The authors also thank the head nurse Lina Shen and her colleagues from the Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University for their full support in the peri-operative management of the patients. This work was financially supported by: the Youth Fund of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (grant number: 20204Y0057), the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (grant number: 2019-I2M-5-003), the Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau/Bureau Level Project (grant number: 201940143), the Shanghai Science and Technology Commission/Biological Medicine Department/Western Medicine Guidance Project (grant number: 20Y11902000), the Shanghai Hospital Development Center Foundation (grant number: SHDC22022201), the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Foundation (grant number: 19411950600), and the Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center/Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Project (grant number: SHDC22021214).
Competing interest
None declared