Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:49:30.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bronchoscopy versus multi-detector computed tomography in the diagnosis of congenital vascular ring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2010

A H Gaafar  and
K I El-Noueam
A H Gaafar*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
K I El-Noueam
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Alaa Gaafar, Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, Champollion st., El-Azareta, no. 21131, Alexandria, Egypt E-mail: gaafar_a@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Vascular rings are congenital vascular anomalies of the aortic arch complex which cause compression of the trachea and/or oesophagus. A variety of investigations may lead to diagnosis of these anomalies, including bronchoscopy and computed tomography. During the latter, image acquisition and processing use the multi-detector row technique and new reconstruction algorithms, producing high-resolution images which can be visualised as complex, three-dimensional renditions.

Objective:

This study aimed to assess and compare the roles of bronchoscopy and multi-detector row computed tomography in the diagnosis of congenital vascular ring.

Patients and methods:

We included infants and children below the age of 16 years who presented with congenital vascular ring. All patients underwent rigid bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia, with spontaneous respiration. All computed tomography scans were obtained using a 16 multi-detector row computed tomography system, followed by data reconstruction on a three-dimensional workstation.

Results:

Ten patients with congenital vascular ring were identified (six boys and four girls). Fifty per cent of cases presented within the first year of life. Double aortic arch was the most common anomaly (40 per cent). Bronchoscopy detected external tracheal compression in nine cases (90 per cent). Associated airway lesions were detected endoscopically in three cases. In contrast, multi-detector row computed tomography detected the vascular ring in all cases, with accurate detection of the compressing vessel; however, it did not detect any associated airway lesions.

Conclusion:

Bronchoscopy and radiological evaluation are essential for the diagnosis and pre-operative evaluation of congenital vascular ring. Multi-detector row computed tomography can provide more information about the nature of the disease, and can facilitate better communication between clinicians, compared with conventional computed tomography.

Keywords

Congenital Vascular RingBronchoscopyMulti Detector Computed Tomography
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 125 , Issue 3 , March 2011 , pp. 301 - 308
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Kaiser, LR, Kron, IL, Spray, TL, eds. Mastery of Cardiothoracic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998Google Scholar
2Shields, TW, LoCicero, JI, Ponn, RB, eds. General Thoracic Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000Google Scholar
3Woods, RK, Sharp, RJ, Holcomb, GW. Vascular anomalies and tracheoesophageal compression: a single institution's 25-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;72:434–9Google Scholar
4Turner, A, Gavel, G, Coutts, J. Vascular rings – presentation, investigation and outcome. Eur J Pediatr 2005;164:266–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bonnard, A, Auber, F, Fourcade, L, Marchac, V, Emond, S, Révillon, Y. Vascular ring abnormalities: a retrospective study of 62 cases. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:539–43Google Scholar
6O'Connor, TE, Cooney, T. Oesophageal foreign body and a double aortic arch: rare dual pathology. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:1–3Google Scholar
7Jones, DT, Jonas, RA, Healy, GB. Innominate artery compression of the trachea in infants. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994;103:347–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Turkvatan, A, Buyukbayraktar, FG, Olçer, T, Cumhur, T. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch: evaluation with the use of multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Radiol 2009;10:176–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Alkadhi, H, Wildermuth, S, Desbiolles, L. Vascular emergencies of the thorax after blunt and iatrogenic trauma multi-detector row CT and three-dimensional imaging. Radiographics 2004;24:1239–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Kriklin, JW. Vascular ring and sling. In: Kriklin, JW, Barratt Boyes, BG, eds. Cardiac Surgery. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1993;1365–82Google Scholar
11Bakker, DA, Berger, RM, Wistenburg, M, Bogers, AJ. Vascular rings: a rare cause of common respiratory symptoms. Acta Pediatr 1999;88:947–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Tuo, G, Volpe, P, Bava, GL. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of isolated vascular rings. Am J Cardiol 2009;103:416–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Andreas, G, Reinhold, P, Micheal, R, Beate, N. Vascular ring causing tracheal compression in an adult patient. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:1959–60Google Scholar
14Ruzmetov, M, Vijay, P, Rodefeld, MD, Turrentine, MW, Brown, JW. Follow-up of surgical correction of aortic arch anomalies causing tracheoesophageal compression: a 38-year single institution experience. J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:1328–32Google Scholar
15Backer, CL, Ilbawi, MN, Idriss, FS, DeLeon, SY. Vascular anomalies causing tracheoesophageal compression. Review of experience in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:725–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Cakir, E, Ersu, RH, Uyan, ZS, Oktem, S, Karadag, B. Flexible bronchoscopy as a valuable tool in the evaluation of persistent wheezing in children. Int J Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1666–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Lawler, LP, Fishman, EK. Multi-detector row CT of thoracic disease with emphasis on 3D volume rendering and CT angiography. Radiographics 2001;21:1257–73Google Scholar
18Sinclair, DS. Traumatic aortic injury: an imaging review. Emerg Radiol 2002;9:13–20Google Scholar
19Gotway, MB, Dawn, SK. Thoracic aorta imaging with multislice CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:521–43Google Scholar
20Lee, EY, Siegel, MJ, Hildebolt, CF, Gutierrez, FR, Bhalla, S, Fallah, JH. MDCT evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of axial, multiplanar, and 3D images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:777–84Google Scholar
21Mirvis, SE. Thoracic vascular injury. Radiol Clin North Am 2006;44:181–97Google Scholar
22Yusuf, KY, Ersin, E, Esce, S. A rare cause of respiratory distress in infants: tracheal compression due to anomalous course of innominate artery. Turk J Ped 2006;48:93–5Google Scholar
23Adler, SC, Isaacson, G, Balsara, RK. Innominate artery compression of the trachea: diagnosis and treatment by anterior suspension. A 25-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995;59:526–8Google Scholar