Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:31:52.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brush cytology and its comparison with histopathological examination in cases of diseases of the nose

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Y. K. Maru*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Group of Hospitals, Indore (MP), India.
S. Munjal
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Group of Hospitals, Indore (MP), India.
Y. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, M.G.M. Medical College and M.Y. Group of Hospitals, Indore (MP), India.
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Y. K. Maru, V-7, Samvad Nagar, Navalakha, Indore 452001 (MP), India. Fax: 91-731-524339

Abstract

Nasal cytology is a simple, easy, bloodless and quite reliable investigation. Although its utility was recognized as early as 1927 by Eyerman, it has not yet gained much popularity. Here, an attempt is made to assess its efficacy for the diagnosis of various inflammatory, benign and malignant conditions in 151 cases of common rhinological problems in the M. Y. Group of Hospitals, Indore MP India.

This method can be used as an adjuvant to clinical diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis as an outpatient department (OPD) procedure with the help of a nasal endoscope, as it was found to be a simple, reliable and time-saving procedure for further management. It can also be used as a screening test for the detection of symptomless patients particularly in precancerous lesions.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bryan, W. T. K., Bryan, M. P. (1950) Structural changes in the ciliated epithelial cells during upper respiratory infection. (Preliminary report). Laryngoscope 60: 523531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryan, W. T. K., Bryan, M. P. (1959). Cytological diagnosis in Otolaryngology. Transaction of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology 63: 597612.Google ScholarPubMed
Drettner, B., Stenkvist, B. (1979) Nasocytologic examination of wood industry workers. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockh) (Suppl 360): 123.Google ScholarPubMed
Erozan, Y. S. (1979) Cytopathology in diagnosis. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 58: 6164.Google ScholarPubMed
Eyerman, C. H. (1927) Nasal manifestations of allergy. Annals of Otolaryngology 36: 808815.Google Scholar
Hansel, F. K. (1934) Observations on the cytology of secretions in allergy of nose and P.N.S. Journal of Allergy 5: 357–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilding, . (1934) As quoted in Nasocytologic examination of wood industry workers. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockh) Suppl 360: 122.Google Scholar
Papanicolaou, G. N. (1954) Atlas of Exfoliative Cytology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 11 and 45.Google Scholar
Voss, R., Reichborn-Kjennerud, S., Abeler, V., Reith, A. (1986) Development of brush cytology for detection of metaplastic and dysplastic nasal mucosa lesions. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockh) 101: 299305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, A. C. (1990) Neoplasia. In Boyd's Textbook of Pathology. 9th Edition. vol. 1, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, London, pp 276277.Google Scholar
Walsh, T. E., Lindsay, J. R. (1934) Cytology of nasal polypi. Archives of Otolaryngology 20: 649658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakode, P. T., Joshi, P. L., Manhore, M. N. (1989) Efficacy of nasal cytology. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology 41: 138140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaharopounlos, P., Wong, J. Y. (1984) Cytological diagnosis of rhinoscleroma. Acta Cytologica 286: 139142.Google Scholar