Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:21:22.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cochlear implantation in a patient with grand mal epilepsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Judith Szilvassy*
Affiliation:
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary.
Jeno Czigner
Affiliation:
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary.
Istvan Somogyi
Affiliation:
Department of Neuro-Psychiatry, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary.
Jozsef Jori
Affiliation:
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary.
Jozsef G. Kiss
Affiliation:
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary.
Zoltan Szilvassy
Affiliation:
Department of 1st Dept Medicine, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical University, Szeged, Hungary.
*
Address for correspondence: Judith Szilvassy, M.D., Dept of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Medical University, H-6721 Szeged, Tisza Lajos krt. 111, Hungary. E-mail: jutka@orl.szote.u-szeged.hu

Abstract

A case is reported in which a Nucleus 22 channel intracochlear implant was used to treat a deaf Hungarian woman (aged 37 years) with a 34-year history of grand mal (GM) epilepsy maintained on carbamazepinediazepam combination therapy who had not benefited from conventional hearing aids. Pre-operative electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve, however, exhibited a good nerve function with no evidence of abnormal waveforms in the electroencephalogram (EEG). Successful intracochlear insertion of the 22 electrode resulted in a 40 dB hearing improvement at frequencies 250–2000 Hz in the implanted ear with no signs of pathologic wave activity at either the previously recognized epileptic focus (fronto-precentral region) or indeed, in other regions of the brain at use of the implant. We conclude that intracochlear implantation per se is not a hazardous intervention in patients with fronto-precentral epileptic foci.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, G. M. (1997) Implants in children. In Cochlear implantation for Infants and Children. (Cowan, R. S. C., Dowell, R. C., eds.) The Singular Publishing Group, San Diego CA. pp 1627.Google Scholar
Dichter, M., Ayala, G. F. (1987) Cellular mechanism of epilepsy: A status report. Science 237: 157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dichter, M. (1994) The epilepsies and convulsive disorders. In Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 13th Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 22272233.Google Scholar
Gibbin, K. P., O'Donoghue, G. M., Murty, G. E. (1994) Pediatric cochlear implantation: The Nottingham surgical experience. In Advances in Cochlear Implants. (Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., Hochmair, E. S., eds.) Manz, Wien, Austria, pp 230232.Google Scholar
Muller-Deile, J., Schmidt, B. J., Rudert, H. (1993) Facial stimulation – a problem in speech processor programming? In Advances in Cochlear Implants (Hochmair-Desoyer, I. J., Hochmair, E. S., eds.) Manz, Wien, Austria, pp 243246.Google Scholar
Oviatt, D. L., Kileny, P. R. (1991) Auditory event-related potentials elicited from cochlear implant recipients and hearing subjects. American Journal of Audiology 1: 4855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, T. (1983) Characteristics of a pure culture of frontal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 24: 1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed