Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:38:42.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct referral hearing aid provision in the over sixties age group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Maurice R. Hawthorne ,
Desmond A. Nunez ,
Graham P. Clarke  and
Desmond Robertshaw
Maurice R. Hawthorne
Affiliation:
(Middlesbrough)
Desmond A. Nunez*
Affiliation:
(Middlesbrough)
Graham P. Clarke
Affiliation:
(Middlesbrough)
Desmond Robertshaw
Affiliation:
(Middlesbrough)
*
D. A. Nunez, Ear, Nose, Throat and Eye Research Foundation, North Riding Infirmary, Newport Road, Middlesbrough, Cleveland TS1 5JE.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A prospective study was designed in which General Practitioners were issued with a standard referral letter for hearing aid provision. Unknown to the General Practitioner an independent otolaryngologist assessment was obtained at the time of first attendance. Three hundred consecutive patients selected by General Practitioners applying these guidelines were seen in a designated hearing aid clinic staffed by audiological technicians of senior grade or above. Referral pro formata were incomplete in 75 patients who were not assessed. Ninety-four patients (31 per cent) (95 per cent confidence interval 29–36 per cent) were accepted by the audiologist. Obstructing wax was the most common criterion failed. Clinical agreement between audiologist and otolaryngologist was 57 per cent greater than chance. None of the cases of clinical disagreement altered treatment. A direct referral system as proposed could have processed only 31 per cent of 300 referrals. However, experienced technical staff reliably detected otological pathology and with aural toilet facilities 91 per cent of 225 patients (confidence interval 88–94 per cent) were aided.

Keywords

Hearing aid
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 105 , Issue 10 , October 1991 , pp. 825 - 827
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, J. B., Nigam, A., Bland, N. C. (1989) Provision of hearing aids: Does specialist assessment cause delay? British Medical Journal, 299: 855–6.Google Scholar
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (1980) McMaster University. Clinical disagreement: How often It occurs and why. Canadian Medical Association Journal 123: 499–504.Google Scholar
Harries, M. L. L., Baguley, D. M., Moffat, D. A. (1989) Hearing aids: A case for review. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 103: 850–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hearing Aid Council (1984) Code of Practice, Examinations and Registration. Prinsley, P., Premachandra, D. J., Madden, G. (1989) Dispensing hearing aids in the community. Lancet 11: 500–515.Google Scholar
Royal National Institute for the Deaf (1988) Hearing aids: The case for change.Google Scholar
ITSA (1988) Suggested criteria which should be satisfied before a patient referred directly to an audiology department by a G.P. may be fitted with a hearing aid. British Society of Audiology Newsletter June: 13–14.Google Scholar
Watson, C., Crowther, J. A. (1989) Provision of hearing aids: Does specialist assessment cause delay? British Medical Journal, 299: 437–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed