Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:43:26.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A full digital, high definition video system (1080i) for laryngoscopy and stroboscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2007

A Tsunoda*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, TokyoJapan
A Hatanaka
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, TokyoJapan
R Tsunoda
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
S Kishimoto
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
K Tsunoda
Affiliation:
Department of Artificial Organs and Otolaryngology, National Institute of Sensory Organs, Tokyo, Japan
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Atsunobu Tsunoda, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Yushima 1-5-45, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan. Fax: 81 3 5803 0215 E-mail: atsunoda@mac.com

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to estimate the effectiveness of a full digital, high definition video system for laryngeal observations.

Methods:

A newly available, full digital, high definition video camera and high definition video monitor were used. With an endoscopic adaptor and rigid telescope, laryngoscopy and stroboscopy were performed on patients with various kinds of laryngeal lesions.

Results:

All laryngeal lesions were observed and recorded by the full digital, high definition video camera without incident. The image quality for laryngoscopy and stroboscopy was far superior to that of a conventional video system, including video-endoscopy. Even tiny structures or lesions could clearly be visualised on the monitor. The still image obtained from the full digital, high definition video camera was 1920 × 1080 pixels and was comparable to that obtained from a still camera.

Conclusions:

Full digital, high definition video cameras are now commonplace products and can easily be applied to patients with laryngeal disorders. They provide superior laryngeal images, compared with conventional video systems. Furthermore, high definition video systems are cheaper than proprietary medical video systems. We consider our system to represent an accessible technique of gaining superior laryngeal observation in otolaryngological clinics.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the 17th annual meeting of the Japan Laryngological Association, 13 April 2006, Kumamoto, Japan.

References

1Woodson, GE. The history of laryngology in the United States. Laryngoscope 1996;106:677–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Sharma, A, Price, T, Mierzwa, K, Montgomery, P, Qayyum, A, Bradnam, T. Transnasal flexible laryngo-oesophagoscopy: an evaluation of the patient's experience. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:2431Google Scholar
3Yanagisawa, E, Carlson, RD. Telescopic video-otoscopy using a compact home video color camera. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1350–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Sato, K, Umeno, H, Nakashima, T. Stroboscopic observation of vocal fold vibration with the videoendoscope. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112:965–70Google Scholar
5Tsunoda, A, Tsunoda, R, Hatanaka, A. Endoscopic adaptor for digital camera and digital imaging filing. Laryngoscope 2002;112:1808–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Tsunoda, K, Tsunoda, A, Ozawa, H, Fujimine, T. High-quality video recording and monitoring system for endoscopes. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1520–1Google Scholar
7Takwoingi, YM, Kale, US. Morgan, DW. Rigid endoscopy in globus pharyngeus: how valuable is it? J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:42–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Otto, KJ, Hapner, ER, Baker, M, Johns, MM. Blinded evaluation of the effects of high definition and magnification on perceived image quality in laryngeal imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2006;115:110–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed