Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:25:43.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hearing aids and tinnitus therapy: a 25-year experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2008

M I Trotter  and
I Donaldson
M I Trotter*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, University Hospital Birmingham, UK
I Donaldson
Affiliation:
ENT Department, University Hospital Birmingham, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Matthew I Trotter, TWJ Fellow, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, 32 Gisborne Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3002. E-mail: Matthew.Trotter@eyeandear.org.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

(1) To assess the subjective tinnitus perception of patients with audiologically proven hearing loss presenting to a tinnitus clinic, both before and after hearing aid provision; (2) to investigate subjective tinnitus perception in patients with unilateral and bilateral hearing loss; and (3) to assess the impact on tinnitus perception, if any, of a digital hearing aid programme in patients provided with hearing aids.

Design:

Prospective data collection for patients attending a tinnitus clinic over a 25-year period (1980–2004).

Setting:

University teaching hospital otolaryngology department.

Participants:

A total of 2153 consecutive patients attending a consultant-delivered specialist tinnitus clinic.

Main outcomes measures:

A visual analogue scale was used to assess the degree of tinnitus perception improvement, if any, comparing before versus after unilateral or bilateral aiding (in those with audiometrically proven hearing loss). A further assessment compared the effect of digital hearing aid programme introduction on symptomatic tinnitus perception in patients provided with unilateral or bilateral aids.

Results:

A total of 1440 patients were given hearing aids (826 unilateral and 614 bilateral). There was little difference in tinnitus perception, comparing overall aiding results in unilaterally or bilaterally aided patients. Overall, 554 (67 per cent) of unilaterally aided patients and 424 (69 per cent) of bilaterally aided patients reported some improvement in their tinnitus perception following aiding. There was a statistically significant improvement in tinnitus perception, comparing analogue aids with digital hearing aids, following introduction of a digital hearing aid programme in 2000, in both unilaterally (p < 0.001) and bilaterally (p < 0.001) aided patients.

Conclusions:

Provision of hearing aids in patients with audiometrically demonstrable hearing loss can play a very important part in tinnitus control. The additional improvement in tinnitus control observed following introduction of programmable digital aids had a summative effect in the management of these patients.

Keywords

TinnitusHearing LossHearing AidsPatientDigital
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 122 , Issue 10 , October 2008 , pp. 1052 - 1056
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part at the British Academic Conference in Otolaryngology, 5–7, July 2006, Birmingham, UK.

References

1 Coles, RR. Epidemiology of tinnitus: (1) prevalence. J Laryngol Otol 1984;9(suppl):7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Axelsson, A, Ringdahl, A. Tinnitus – a study of its prevalence and characteristics. Br J Audiol 1989;23:53–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Hazell, JWP. Management of tinnitus: discussion paper. J R Soc Med 1985;78:56–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Heller, MF, Bergman, M. Tinnitus aurium in normally hearing persons. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1953;62:73–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Folmer, R, Carroll, JR. Long-term effectiveness of ear-level devices for tinnitus. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:132–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Jastreboff, PJ, Gray, WC, Gold, SL. Neurophysiological approach to tinnitus patients. Am J Otol 1996;17:236–40Google ScholarPubMed
7 Dobie, R. Overview: suffering from tinnitus. In: Snow, JB Jr, ed. Tinnitus: Theory and Management. Lewiston, New York: BC Decker, 2004;1–7Google Scholar
8 Sahley, TL, Nodar, RH. A biochemical model of peripheral tinnitus. Hear Res 2001;152:43–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Davis, AC. The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol 1989;18:911–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Nondahl, DM, Cruickshank, KJ, Wiley, TL, Klein, R, Klein, BE, Tweed, TS. Prevalence and 5-year incidence of tinnitus among older adults: the epidemiology of hearing loss study. J Am Acad Audiol 2002;13:323–31Google ScholarPubMed
11 Sindhusake, D, Mitchell, P, Newall, P, Golding, M, Rochtina, E, Rubin, G. Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus in older adults: the Blue Mountain Hearing Study. International Journal of Audiology 2003;42:289–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Office of National Statistics. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_compendia/lib2002.pdf. 2007. [19 April 2007]Google Scholar
13 McCombe, A, Baguley, D, Coles, R, McKenna, L, McKinney, C, Windle-Taylor, P. Guidelines for the grading of tinnitus severity: the results of a working group commissioned by the British Association of Otolaryngologists, Head and Neck Surgeons, 1999. Clin Otolaryngol 2001;26:388–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Newman, CW, Jacobson, GP, Spitzer, JB. Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:143–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Newman, CW, Sandridge, SA, Jacobson, GP. Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:153–60Google ScholarPubMed
16 Klockhoff, I, Lindblom, U. Meniere's disease and hydrochlorothiazide (Dichlotride) – a critical analysis of symptoms and therapeutic effects. Acta Otolaryngol 1967;63:347–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed