Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:58:32.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hypobaric pressure exposure effects on cochlear frequency selectivity in fluctuating, low-frequency hearing loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2009

K J Brännström*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Sweden Malmö University Hospital, Sweden
J Grenner
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Science, Lund University, Sweden Section of Audiology, ENT Department, Lund University Hospital, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: K Jonas Brännström, Department of Audiology, SE-205 02 Malmö, Sweden. E-mail: jonas.brannstrom@med.lu.se

Abstract

Aim:

To study the effects of hypobaric pressure chamber exposure on the cochlear frequency selectivity of subjects with monaural, fluctuating, low-frequency hearing loss, such as occurs in Ménière's disease.

Methods:

We used a hypobaric pressure chamber to create relative underpressure in the ear canal, in order to impose positive pressure gradients on the inner ear. Psychophysical tuning curves, transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and speech recognition scores in noise were measured in 10 subjects with fluctuating, low-frequency hearing loss, before and after pressure exposure.

Results:

After the exposure, subjects’ overall pure tone averages showed no improvement, but individual results showed improved speech recognition scores in noise (six subjects), increased transiently evoked otoacoustic emission strength (three subjects) and increased psychophysical tuning curve steepness (two subjects). Deteriorations were also seen, mainly in psychophysical tuning curves. No association could be established between the different tests, and the measured parameters could not predict subjective improvement.

Conclusion:

The results suggest variable effects of hypobaric pressure exposure on inner-ear physiology.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the second joint meeting of the Acoustical Society of America and the European Acoustical Association, Acoustics ’08, 29 June to 4 July 2008, Paris, France.

References

1 Kimura, RS. Review on histopathology of Ménière's disease. In: Vesterhauge, S, Katholm, M, Mikines, P, eds. Ménière's Disease. Proceeding of the 16th Danavox Symposium, Sept 19–22, 1995. Kolding: Scanticon, 1995;93103Google Scholar
2 Xenellis, JE, Linthicum, FHJ, Webster, P, Lopez, R. Basilar membrane displacement related to endolymphatic sac volume. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1953–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Konrádsson, KS, Carlborg, B, Grenner, J, Tjernström, O. Electrocochleographic and audiometric evaluation of hypobaric effect in Ménière's disease. Laryngoscope 1999;109:5964CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 van Deelen, GH, Hulk, J, Huizing, EH. The use of underpressure chamber in the treatment of patients with Meniere's disease. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:229–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Kitahara, M, Kodama, A, Izukura, H, Ozawa, H. Effect of atmospheric pressure on hearing in patients with Meniere's disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;510:111–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Tjernström, O, Casselbrant, M, Harris, S, Ivarsson, A. Current status of pressure chamber treatment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1980;13:723–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Tjernström, O. Pressure chamber treatment. In: Pfaltz, CR, ed. Controversial Aspects of Ménière's Disease. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1986;96–8Google Scholar
8 Densert, B. Effects of overpressure on hearing function in Meniere's disease. Acta Otolaryngol 1987;103:3242CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Stelmachowicz, PG, Jesteadt, W, Gorga, MP, Mott, J. Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:620–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Donaldson, GS, Ruth, RA. Derived band auditory brain-stem response estimates of traveling wave velocity in humans. I: Normal-hearing subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;93:940–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Donaldson, GS, Ruth, RA. Derived band auditory brain-stem response estimates of traveling wave velocity in humans. II: Subjects with noise-induced hearing loss and Meniere's disease. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:534–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12 Allen, GW. Clinical implications of experiments on alteration of the labyrinthine fluid pressure. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1983;16:319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Tonndorf, J. Endolymphatic hydrops: mechanical causes of hearing loss. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1976;212:293–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 Don, M, Kwong, B, Tanaka, C. A diagnostic test for Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops: impaired high-pass noise masking of auditory brainstem responses. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:711–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Thornton, AR, Farrell, G. Apparent travelling wave velocity changes in cases of endolymphatic hydrops. Scand Audiol 1991;20:1318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Serbetcioglu, M, Parker, D. Measures of cochlear travelling wave delay in humans: I. Comparison of three techniques in subjects with normal hearing. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:537–43Google ScholarPubMed
17 Huss, M, Moore, BC. Dead regions and pitch perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:3841–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Turner, C, Burns, EM, Nelson, DA. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:966–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19 Burns, EM, Turner, C. Pure-tone pitch anomalies. II. Pitch-intensity effects and diplacusis in impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;79:1530–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Florentine, M, Houtsma, AJ. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:961–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere's disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:181–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Magnusson, L. Reliable clinical determination of speech recognition scores using Swedish PB words in speech-weighted noise. Scand Audiol 1995;24:217–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 ISO 389-1. Acoustics: reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 1: reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. Proceedings of International Organization for Standardization 389–1, 1998Google Scholar
24 Brännström, J, Grenner, J. Clinical application of long-term intensity and pitch matches in fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2008;47:412–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 ISO 389-8. Acoustics: Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones. Proceedings of International Organization for Standardization 389–8, 2004Google Scholar
26 IEC 60318-1 I. Electroacoustics – Simulators of Human Head and Ear – Part 1: Ear Simulator for the Calibration of Supra-Aural Earphones. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1998Google Scholar
27 IEC 60318-2 I. Electroacoustics – Simulators of Human Head and Ear – Part 2: An Interim Acoustic Coupler for the Calibration of Audiometric Earphones in the Extended High-Frequency Range. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1998Google Scholar
28 Brännström, J, Grenner, J. Long-term measurement of binaural intensity and pitch matches. II. Fluctuating low-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2008;47:675–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Moore, BC, Alcantara, JI. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001;22:268–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30 Konrádsson, KS, Svensson, O, Carlborg, B, Grenner, J. Tympanic pressure gradients and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1999;20:403–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31 Carlborg, B, Farmer, JJ, Carlborg, A. Effects of hypobaric pressure on the labyrinth. Cochlear aqueduct patent. Acta Otolaryngol 1990;110:386–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32 Konrádsson, KS, Carlborg, A, Farmer, JJ, Carlborg, B. Perilymph pressure during hypobaric conditions – cochlear aqueduct obstructed. Acta Otolaryngol 1994;114:24–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33 Carlborg, B, Konrádsson, KS, Carlborg, A, Farmer, JJ, Densert, O. Pressure transfer between the perilymph and the cerebrospinal fluid compartments in cats. Am J Otol 1992;13:41–8Google ScholarPubMed
34 van den Abeele, D, van de Heyning, PH, Creten, W, Graff, A, Marquet, JFE. Psychoacoustical tuning curves. Scand Audiol 1992;21:38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35 Statistical aspects on measurement accuracy. In: Arlinger, SD, ed. Manual of Practical Audiometry. London: Whurr, 1993;2:2430Google Scholar
36 Larsen, HC, Angelborg, C. Low-pressure chamber test in Meniere's disease. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1991;481:474–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37 Böhmer, A. Hydrostatic pressure in the inner ear fluid compartments and its effects on inner ear function. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1993;507:324Google ScholarPubMed
38 Martini, A, Prosser, S. Disorders of the inner ear in adults. In: Luxon, LM, ed. Textbook of Audiological Medicine. Clinical Aspects of Hearing and Balance. London: Martin Dunitz, 2003;451–76Google Scholar
39 Schuknecht, HF. Pathology of the Ear. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974Google Scholar
40 Schuknecht, HF, Igarashi, M. Pathophysiology of Ménière's disease. In: Pfaltz, CR, ed. Controversial Aspects of Ménière's Disease. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1986;4654Google Scholar
41 Patuzzi, R. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos, P, Popper, AN, Fay, RR, eds. The Cochlea. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1996;186257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Ödkvist, LM, Arlinger, SD, Billermark, E, Densert, B, Lindholm, S, Wallqvist, J. Effects of middle ear pressure changes on clinical symptoms in patients with Ménière's disease – a clinical multicentre placebo-controlled study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2000;543:99101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43 Carlborg, B, Densert, B, Densert, O. Functional patency of the cochlear aqueduct. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1982;91:209–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed