Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:14:36.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving the rhinomanometry technique using benzoin tincture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2018

F Arslan ,
Ü Yıldızoğlu ,
A Durmaz  and
S Çetinkaya
F Arslan*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beytepe Murat Erdi Eker State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Ü Yıldızoğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ünye State Hospital, Ordu, Turkey
A Durmaz
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Gulhane Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
S Çetinkaya
Affiliation:
Department of Toxicology, Gulhane Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Fatih Arslan, Department of Otolaryngology, Beytepe Murat Erdi Eker State Hospital, Beytepe 06500, Ankara, Turkey Fax: +90 3129 060 814 E-mail: drfatiharslan@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

In order to achieve a faster and more reliable anterior rhinomanometric evaluation, nasal skin was prepared using benzoin tincture solution, which provides simpler and better adhesion of the foam tape to the nasal skin.

Method:

Two consecutive anterior rhinomanometry measurements were made, one with and one without benzoin tincture application.

Results:

The average time taken to perform classic foam tape anterior rhinomanometry without benzoin tincture application was 281.32 seconds, and the average coefficients of variation for the right and left passages were 7.48 and 7.59 per cent, respectively. When benzoin tincture was used, the average time taken for completion of the tests was 121.24 seconds, and the average coefficients of variation for the right and left passages were 2.17 and 2.32 per cent.

Conclusion:

The use of benzoin tincture to clean the nasal skin before placing foam tape shortens the procedure duration and significantly increases test reliability.

Keywords

BenzoinAirway ResistanceData AccuracyRhinomanometry
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 132 , Issue 5 , May 2018 , pp. 404 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Cole, P, Roithmann, R, Roth, Y, Chapnik, JS. Measurement of airway patency. A manual for users of the Toronto systems and others interested in nasal patency measurement. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1997;171:1–23.Google Scholar
2Kern, EB. Rhinomanometry. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1973;6:863–74.Google Scholar
3Clement, PA, Gordts, F. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 2005;43:169–79.Google Scholar
4Cole, P, Fenton, RS. Contemporary rhinomanometry. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:83–7.Google Scholar
5Eccles, R. A guide to practical aspects of measurement of human nasal airflow by rhinomanometry. Rhinology 2011;49:2–10.Google Scholar
6Naito, K, Iwata, S. Current advances in rhinomanometry. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997;254:309–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Eren, SB, Tugrul, S, Dogan, R, Ozucer, B, Ozturan, O. Objective and subjective evaluation of operation success in patients with nasal septal deviation based on septum type. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014;28:158–62.Google Scholar
8Tatar, A, Altas, E. Effects of radiofrequency thermal ablation on the nasal cycle measured using rhinomanometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2014;123:771–7.Google Scholar
9Schumacher, MJ. Nasal dyspnea: the place of rhinomanometry in its objective assessment. Am J Rhinol 2004;18:41–6.Google Scholar
10Chandra, RK, Patadia, MO, Raviv, J. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:207–25.Google Scholar
11Vogt, K, Jalowayski, AA, Althaus, W, Cao, C, Han, D, Hasse, W et al. 4-Phase-Rhinomanometry (4PR)--basics and practice 2010. Rhinol Suppl 2010;21:1–50.Google Scholar
12Broms, P, Ivarsson, A, Jonson, B. Rhinomanometry. I. Simple equipment. Acta Otolaryngol 1982;93:455–60.Google Scholar
13Babatola, FD, Eccles, R. A new technique using a nasal cast for anterior rhinomanometry. Rhinology 1987;25:109–15.Google Scholar
14Hasegawa, M, Kern, EB. Variations in nasal resistance in man: a rhinomanometric study of the nasal cycle in 50 human subjects. Rhinology 1978;16:19–29.Google Scholar
15Carrington, PR. Tacky but refined: a “slick” technique for dressings that hold better. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:929–30.Google Scholar