Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:46:41.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Litigation in otolaryngology – trends and recommendations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2006

J R Savage
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon, UK
G M Weiner
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon, UK

Abstract

Background: Seeking to identify where litigious claims against otolaryngologists are targeted (i.e. areas of highest risk) within the NHS and private sector would have positive implications in risk management and limiting the amount of litigation against otolaryngologists.

Method: The National Health Service Litigation Authority (NHSLA) and Medical Defence Union (MDU) were contacted and anonymous data obtained on claims within ENT.

Results: 887 claims were notified – 457 NHSLA and 430 MDU. The commonest claim in both groups was failure or delay in diagnosis (12 per cent NHSLA, 23 per cent MDU). The other commonest claims were all related to complications (nerve damage 10 per cent, deafness 8 per cent and dental damage 5 per cent). Dissatisfaction with results was 8 per cent total and, within the private sector, was almost exclusively in rhinology.

Conclusions: This study once again emphasizes the need for thorough clinical assessment, record keeping and good communication with patients. Recognising these areas of highest risk may limit future claims.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
2006 JLO (1984) Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)