Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:37:25.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-molecular-weight heparin salvage in pedicled flap reconstruction in head and neck: a prospective cohort study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

Smriti Panda*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Vimmi Gautam
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Sandipta Mitra
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Chirom Amit Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Suresh Mani
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Akshara Palreddy
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Yuvanesh Kabilan
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Abhilash Konkimalla
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Dheeraj Kondamudi
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Debadeep Bagchi
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Sarath Raveendran
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Kapil Sikka
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Rajeev Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Anup Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
Alok Thakar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
*
Corresponding author: Smriti Panda; Email: smriti.panda.87@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To determine if systemic administration of low-molecular-weight heparin impacts venous compromise in loco-regional flap reconstruction for head and neck subsites.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted on patients who had developed features of venous compromise of the flap. The case group received low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin).

Results

Of the 73 patients who developed venous congestion, low-molecular-weight heparin was administered in 47 patients. In the low-molecular-weight heparin subset, 23 patients had either reversal or non-progression of venous compromise (48.9 per cent). Of the patients who had no response to low-molecular-weight heparin rescue, complete necrosis was seen in 4 and partial flap necrosis was observed in 19. The corresponding numbers in the control group were 13 and 12, respectively (odds ratio 23.9, p = 0.002). Additionally, the low-molecular-weight heparin arm had a lower incidence of partial or complete flap necrosis (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Low-molecular-weight heparin salvage, when instituted early, is likely to result in a significant reduction in flap-related morbidity.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Introduction

Reconstructive options for complex head and neck defects that arise following resection of head and neck cancer range from microvascular free tissue transfer to loco-regional pedicled flaps. Although the former is considered the standard of care, loco-regional flaps, such as pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps, still account for the vast majority of flap procedures performed in resource-constrained high-volume oncology centres in Asia. Pedicled flaps are also relevant in the salvage setting following the failure of microvascular free tissue transfer.Reference Kanazawa, Sarukawa, Fukushima, Takeoda, Kusaka and Ichimura1

Although pedicled flaps such as pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps are robust and considered the workhorse of head and neck reconstruction even today, rates of flap necrosis range from 17 to 63 per cent.Reference Shah, Haribhakti, Loree and Sutaria2 Underlying factors responsible for the necrosis of a pedicled flap include compression of the pedicle, twisting of the pedicle, local oedema and vascular spasm.Reference Akan, Yildirim and Gideroğlu3,Reference Talbot and Pribaz4 Venous insufficiency has been found to outnumber arterial spasm following reconstruction due to either free tissue transfer or pedicled flaps.Reference Talbot and Pribaz4 The following reasons account for the greater vulnerability of venous channels: lower pressure in the venous system compared with the arterial system predisposing the former to compression injury, oedema and torsion, and insufficient venous outflow channels in some flaps, with concomitant high flow arterial influx.Reference Talbot and Pribaz4

Venous insufficiency in a pedicled flap needs to be regarded with similar weightage as in the case of free tissue transfer. Once venous insufficiency is identified, the window period available for instituting salvage measures is crucial.Reference Pérez, Sancho, Ferrer, García and Barret5 Unlike free tissue transfer, surgical re-exploration on account of venous insufficiency is not routinely undertaken for pedicled flaps.Reference Talbot and Pribaz4,Reference Pérez, Sancho, Ferrer, García and Barret5 Moreover, there are existing lacunae in the literature regarding successful salvage measures for early venous compromise in pedicled flaps. Hence, this study was undertaken to evaluate the role of low-molecular-weight heparin pedicled flaps showing signs of venous compromise.

Methods

A prospective study was undertaken at a tertiary care oncology centre in India from January 2020 to July 2022. Patients who had undergone reconstruction for head and neck defects using loco-regional pedicled flaps and subsequently developed features of venous compromise were included. Patients receiving antiplatelet drugs (except low-dose aspirin) and warfarin were excluded. This study was conducted after obtaining institutional ethical approval (Institute Ethics Committee (IEC) PG-115/24.02.2022 and IEC PG-87/24). Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants.

Intervention

The study population consisted of two groups with comparable baseline features. In Arm A, low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) in a dose of 5000 Units was administered daily through the subcutaneous route for 5 days from the onset of venous insufficiency. Dalteparin belongs to the class of low-molecular-weight heparin. Unlike unfractionated heparin, dalteparin's mechanism of action involves more selective inhibition of factor Xa, thereby potentiating the antithrombin pathway.

In Arm B, no therapeutic intervention was undertaken following the onset of venous insufficiency.

The cases and controls were decided based on the treating unit to which the patient was admitted. Low-molecular-weight heparin was offered as salvage in one unit, whereas standard of care was followed for flap congestion in the other unit. Patient recruitment and data collection were done prospectively.

Outcome

The primary outcome of this study was to determine the difference between the two arms in terms of the incidence of flap necrosis and the reversal of venous insufficiency. The secondary outcomes were to assess predictors of successful salvage with low-molecular-weight heparin. Adverse outcomes, especially bleeding-related complications, were also compared between the two arms. All patients were followed up for a minimum of four weeks post-operatively to determine the final outcome in terms of flap viability.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Medcal version 20.114. Comparison between the two groups was undertaken using the chi-square test. An unpaired t-test was used to identify the difference between the two means. Univariate analysis was performed using Fischer's exact test. Multivariable analysis was performed using logistic regression. A p value less than 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 280 pedicled flap reconstructions were undertaken during the study time frame. Table 1 details the various flaps used for reconstruction. Of these, 73 flaps were included because of the presence of venous congestion. In addition, 47 out of 73 patients received low-molecular-weight heparin for venous congestion and were included in Arm A. The majority of the venous congestions were identified beyond 48 hours of surgery (71.4 per cent vs 28.5 per cent). The rest of the 26 patients were grouped under Arm B and did not receive any therapeutic intervention for venous congestion.

Table 1. Outcome following pedicled flap reconstruction

LMWH = low-molecular-weight heparin; PMMF = pectoralis major myocutaneous flap; IHMF = infrahyoid myocutaneous flap; SCAIF = supraclavicular artery island flap

Table 2 summarises the baseline attributes of the two study populations. The groups were well balanced in terms of sex distribution, mean age, type of pedicled flap used and subsite reconstructed (p > 0.05). However, Arm B had a higher percentage of segmental mandibulectomy defects than Arm A (p < 0.001).

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of Arm A (LMWH arm) and Arm B (control arm)

LMWH = low molecular weight heparin; SD = standard deviation; PMMF = pectoralis major myocutaneous flap; IHMF = infrahyoid myocutaneous flap; SCAIF = supraclavicular artery island flap; STG = subtotal glossectomy; NTG = near-total glossectomy; SM = segmental mandibulectomy; MM = marginal mandibulectomy

Primary outcome: Flap viability at four weeks

Arm A

Of the 47 patients who received LMWH, 23 flaps either did not show signs of progression or underwent complete resolution of congestion (Figures 1A and 2). On follow-up, 19 flaps underwent partial necrosis of the congested segment (Figures 1B) and complete flap necrosis due to the progression of congestion was noted in 4 patients.

Figure 1. Pie chart depicting primary outcome analysis. (a) The difference between the two study arms in terms of reversal or non-progression of venous congestion. (b) The difference between the two study arms in terms of final flap viability at four weeks. Arrows are for showing a breakup of the number of cases depicted in the shaded area

Figure 2. Before and after intervention images from Arm A. Before (a) and after (b) images of a congested pectoralis major myocutaneous flap used for skin coverage after radical parotidectomy showing complete reversal of congestion at 72 hours. Before (c) and after (d) images of an infrahyoid flap repair following compartment glossectomy showing non-progression of the congested area at four weeks post-operatively. Before (e) and after (f) images of a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap following subtotal glossectomy showing complete resolution of the congested area five days post-operatively. Before (g) and after (h) images of a bipaddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap repair following full-thickness excision, segmental mandibulectomy and infratemporal fossa clearance showing the non-progression of congestion and partial necrosis of the congested area at four weeks

Arm B

Of the 26 patients who did not receive any therapeutic intervention, spontaneous resolution of venous congestion was observed in only 1 patient (Figure 1). The other 25 flaps underwent various degrees of necrosis (partial necrosis in 12, complete necrosis in 13).

Comparison of Arm A and Arm B

The difference between the two arms in terms of reversal or non-progression of venous congestion was found to be statistically significant, with an odds ratio in favour of Arm A (odds ratio 23.9, p = 0.002). In terms of flap viability at 4 weeks, Arm B had a higher percentage of partial necrosis (46.15 per cent vs 40.42 per cent) and a higher incidence of complete necrosis (50 per cent vs 8.5 per cent). The latter difference was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.002).

Secondary outcome: Predictors for successful salvage with low-molecular-weight heparin

The variables considered in the univariate analysis were subsite reconstructed, type of flap and time of initiation of low-molecular-weight heparin (hours post-operatively) (Table 3). No statistically significant association could be demonstrated between subsite and type of flap with successful salvage. However, patients for whom low-molecular-weight heparin was initiated between 12 and 24 hours post-operatively (n = 30) demonstrated a 70 per cent salvage rate compared with a 13.3 per cent salvage rate in patients for whom low-molecular-weight heparin was initiated >24 hours post-operatively (odds ratio 15.6, p = 0.005).

Table 3. Univariate analysis

LMWH = low molecular weight heparin

Secondary outcome: Adverse effect analysis

The incidence of surgical site hematoma was compared between Arm A and the remaining cohort of all patients (with or without venous congestion, n = 233). Arm A had a 12.76 per cent hematoma incidence while the rest of the cohort had a 2.57 per cent hematoma incidence (odds ratio 6.67, p = 0.0017). All patients (n = 12) who developed surgical site hematoma required a return to the operating theatre for evacuation of hematoma and clots. One patient in the non-low-molecular-weight heparin group required ligation of the external carotid artery. Hematoma formation did not prolong hospital stay, time to adjuvant treatment and time to oral feed initiation nor did it predispose to surgical site infection in any of the patients.

Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors for secondary haemorrhage in the entire cohort of 280 patients. The factors considered were hypertension, chronic liver disease, coronary artery disease with a history of low-dose aspirin intake, abnormal coagulogram (defined as an international normalised ratio greater than 2) and low-molecular-weight heparin administration. The independent prognostic variables identified were hypertension (odds ratio 5.745, 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 1.40–23.5, p = 0.01) and low-molecular-weight heparin administration (odds ratio 7.7, 95 per cent CI = 2.04–29.15, p = 0.002). The study was limited in assessing the interaction between antiplatelet and low-molecular-weight heparin towards bleeding-related complications because only three patients were identified as receiving both antiplatelet and low-molecular-weight heparin.

Discussion

This study prospectively evaluated the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) in pedicled flaps used in head and neck reconstruction showing venous congestion (n = 47) compared to 26 patients who did not receive any therapeutic intervention for congestion and hence served as the control arm. In the intervention arm, 48.96 per cent of the flaps showed either reversal or non-progression of venous congestion. In the control arm (Arm B), only 1 patient showed signs of spontaneous reversal (3.8 per cent) (p = 0.002). This translated to a significant difference between the two arms in terms of incidence of complete flap necrosis at 4 weeks (Arm A 8.5 per cent, Arm B 50 per cent) (p = 0.002).

We also assessed the predictors for successful salvage and found higher salvage rates in the subset of patients where low-molecular-weight heparin was initiated in the early post-operative period (12–24 hours). The salvage rate documented in the early initiation subset was 70 per cent and the salvage rate in the subset where low-molecular-weight heparin was administered after a lapse of 24 hours was 13.3 per cent (p = 0.0015).

The options available to increase flap viability in the context of microvascular free tissue transfer are myriad. Because of the paucity of evidence for the pedicled flap, this study was designed by extrapolating the available evidence in the field of microvascular reconstruction.Reference Pérez, Sancho, Ferrer, García and Barret5 Although there is no uniform consensus even amongst microvascular surgeons, commonly employed agents targeting the coagulation pathway include heparin and its analogues, dextran, aspirin and statins.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6 An ideal antithrombotic agent in the setting of reconstruction should prolong flap viability and at the same time not cause unnecessary complications related to bleeding.Reference Chien, Varvares, Hadlock, Cheney and Deschler7 Because of the risk of post-operative haemorrhage, unfractionated heparin has been gradually replaced with low-molecular-weight heparin.Reference Numajiri, Sowa, Nishino, Arai, Tsujikawa and Ikebuchi8

Other reasons for favouring low-molecular-weight heparin over unfractionated heparin are the requirement for activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) in the case of unfractionated heparin and the possibility of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6 Unlike heparin and its analogues, which target the coagulation pathway involved in venous thrombosis, aspirin, which is a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, functions by inhibiting platelet aggregation.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6 Studies performed by Khouri et al. on the fibrin and platelet content of anastomotic clots showed higher fibrin content than platelet content, thereby recommending heparin as the primary antithrombotic agent.Reference Khouri, Cooley, Kenna and Edstrom9 However, later studies utilising scanning electron microscopy have shown equal contents of fibrin and aspirin.Reference Savoie, Cooley and Gould10 Thus, many microvascular surgeons have incorporated aspirin along with low molecular heparin in their antithrombotic armamentarium.Reference Chien, Varvares, Hadlock, Cheney and Deschler7 Nevertheless, the possible detrimental effects of combining two antithrombotic agents, as observed by Bahl et al. in their analysis involving a large database of otolaryngology patients receiving chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism, should be noted.Reference Bahl, Shuman, Hu, Jackson, Pannucci and Alaniz11

The role of statins is yet to be confirmed by larger studies.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6 Dextrans have also not been used in a widespread manner owing to possible side effects relating to volume overload, compromising the cardiovascular system in susceptible individuals and anaphylactic reactions.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6

Our extensive literature search did not reveal studies performed on subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin salvage of compromised pedicled flaps. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, this is the only prospective study investigating the role of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin in pedicled flap venous congestion. We did, however, identify one series of 9 compromised pedicled flaps where local injection of heparin showed a dramatic response, resulting in 100 per cent salvage rates.Reference Pérez, Sancho, Ferrer, García and Barret5

Unlike pedicled flaps, antithrombotic measures are routinely employed in microvascular free tissue transfer. However, the literature is conflicted over the efficacy of routine antithrombotic agent use in free flap surgery. In a meta-analysis conducted by Pan et al., no statistically significant difference in terms of flap viability was noted amongst patients receiving either heparin or aspirin.Reference Pan, Chen, Shao, Han, Zhang and Zhi12 This study also found a higher rate of flap loss in the patient group receiving high-dose low-molecular-weight heparin. The only study skewing the results against high-dose low molecular weight heparin is that by Blackburn et al., which reported higher flap loss with increasing dose of heparin, but without an increase in the incidence of bleeding-related complications.Reference Blackburn, Java, Lowe, Brown and Rogers13

In the study by Numajiri et al. on unfractionated heparin, the heparin group was shown to cause significant prolongation of APTT and prothrombin time, causing an increase in bleeding-related complications while not resulting in a significant alteration in final flap viability.Reference Numajiri, Sowa, Nishino, Arai, Tsujikawa and Ikebuchi8 Contrary to these studies, Eley et al. showed that high-dose dalteparin as used in our study did not increase bleeding risk.Reference Numajiri, Sowa, Nishino, Arai, Tsujikawa and Ikebuchi8,Reference Pan, Chen, Shao, Han, Zhang and Zhi12,Reference Blackburn, Java, Lowe, Brown and Rogers13,Reference Eley, Parker and Watt-Smith14 In addition, it was found that lower doses of dalteparin caused an insufficient level of anti-factor Xa, which is a surrogate marker for low-molecular-weight heparin efficacy.Reference Eley, Parker and Watt-Smith14

The best evidence favouring subcutaneous heparin use following free flap surgery was reported by Khouri et al.Reference Khouri, Cooley, Kunselman, Landis, Yeramian and Ingram15 In their series of 493 free flaps, subcutaneous heparin use significantly reduced thrombotic complications in the flaps. Despite the literature being conflicted, real-world data, as revealed by a survey by Glicksman et al., showed that 96 per cent of reconstructive surgeons use some form of antithrombotic measure.Reference Glicksman, Ferder, Casale, Posner, Kim and Strauch16

There is little data regarding routine antithrombotic drug administration in otorhinolaryngology outside of a free flap reconstruction.Reference Bahl, Shuman, Hu, Jackson, Pannucci and Alaniz11 The Caprini risk assessment tool is commonly used to predict the predisposition of a patient for post-operative venous thromboembolism.Reference Caprini17 In the study by Bahl et al., 30 per cent of patients with head and neck cancer and those undergoing reconstruction were found to have a Caprini score of 7 and higher compared to 16 per cent of non-oncology otolaryngology patients.Reference Bahl, Shuman, Hu, Jackson, Pannucci and Alaniz11 Although this study found subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin to be useful in the context of prevention of venous thromboembolism events in the above subset, results related to flap viability were not presented.

The study by Bahl et al. documented higher bleeding rates in patients receiving a combination of antiplatelet and low-molecular-weight heparin.Reference Bahl, Shuman, Hu, Jackson, Pannucci and Alaniz11 An 11.9 per cent incidence of bleeding complications was identified in patients post free flap reconstruction receiving thromboprophylaxis, which compares well with the 12.76 per cent incidence in our study.Reference Bahl, Shuman, Hu, Jackson, Pannucci and Alaniz11

Kroll et al. performed a non-randomised prospective study on 517 free flap procedures, comparing no anticoagulation, low-dose heparin bolus and post-operative infusion, high-dose intra-operative bolus and dextran.Reference Kroll, Miller, Reece, Baldwin, Robb and Bengtson18 Hematoma rates were highest in the high-dose heparin group (20 per cent) and were 6.5 per cent in the low-dose group. However, flap survival and rates of pedicle thrombosis were lower than in patients who did not receive any form of anticoagulation (p > 0.05). Similar results were also observed in the study by Khouri et al., in which hematoma rates were higher in the anticoagulation group and better results in terms of flap viability were also observed in these patients.Reference Khouri, Cooley, Kunselman, Landis, Yeramian and Ingram15

As observed in our study, although hematoma rates were high compared with the rest of the cohort, we did not record the prolongation of hospital stay, delay in initiation of feeds or adjuvant treatment owing specifically to this complication. However, the sequelae associated with a compromised flap that goes on necrose to a significant extent can be disastrous in terms of treatment package time, quality of life and requirement of a second salvage flap.

Once venous congestion sets in, time to intervention is paramount. As noted in our study (Table 3), when the time to initiation exceeded 24 hours, only 2 flaps could be satisfactorily salvaged. Our results in pedicled flaps closely correspond to the findings observed in microvascular free tissue transfer.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6 In free flaps, 90 per cent of arterial thrombi and 42 per cent of venous thrombi occurred on the first post-operative day and 95 per cent of free flap re-explorations occurred in the first 72 hours.Reference Pršić, Kiwanuka, Caterson and Caterson6

Although this study presents a novel idea to salvage pedicled flaps with early-onset venous congestion and results have been compared with a well-balanced control group, it was limited by the small sample size, especially of the control arm. The study also lacks a detailed analysis of surgical complications and other parameters of bleeding tendencies, such as the requirement for blood transfusion and the duration of surgical drain placement.

  • It was found that 48.9 per cent of flaps could be effectively salvaged following the administration of low-molecular-weight heparin

  • The low-molecular-weight heparin group had a significantly lower incidence of partial and complete flap loss compared with the control group

  • Administration of low-molecular-weight heparin within 12–24 hours of flap congestion was associated with a higher salvage rate (odds ratio 16.6)

  • The use of low-molecular-weight heparin was associated with a higher incidence of secondary haemorrhage rates

Conclusion

Low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) used in a dose of 5000 units subcutaneously once a day following venous congestion showed immense promise towards salvaging pedicled flaps which without any intervention have a remote chance of reversal, thereby drastically reducing the incidence of complete necrosis of the flaps.

Competing interest

None declared

Footnotes

Smriti Panda takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

This paper was presented in the ‘Most Outstanding Work’ section of the 2022 International Conference of the Korean Society for Head and Neck Oncology 24–25 September 2022, at Seoul, South Korea

References

Kanazawa, T, Sarukawa, S, Fukushima, H, Takeoda, S, Kusaka, G, Ichimura, K. Current reconstructive techniques following head and neck cancer resection using microvascular surgery. Ann Vasc Dis 2011;4:189–9510.3400/avd.ra.11.00009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, JP, Haribhakti, V, Loree, TR, Sutaria, P. Complications of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in head and neck reconstruction. Am J Surg 1990;160:352–510.1016/S0002-9610(05)80541-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akan, IM, Yildirim, S, Gideroğlu, K. Salvage of flaps with venous congestion. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:45610.1097/00000637-200104000-00022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, SG, Pribaz, JJ. First aid for failing flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010;26:513–1510.1055/s-0030-1261697CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez, M, Sancho, J, Ferrer, C, García, O, Barret, JP. Management of flap venous congestion: the role of heparin local subcutaneous injection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014;67:4855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pršić, A, Kiwanuka, E, Caterson, SA, Caterson, EJ. Anticoagulants and statins as pharmacological agents in free flap surgery: current rationale. Eplasty 2015;15:e51Google ScholarPubMed
Chien, W, Varvares, MA, Hadlock, T, Cheney, M, Deschler, DG. Effects of aspirin and low-dose heparin in head and neck reconstruction using microvascular free flaps. Laryngoscope 2005;115:973–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Numajiri, T, Sowa, Y, Nishino, K, Arai, A, Tsujikawa, T, Ikebuchi, K et al. Use of systemic low-dose unfractionated heparin in microvascular head and neck reconstruction: influence in free-flap outcomes. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2016;50:135–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khouri, RK, Cooley, BC, Kenna, DM, Edstrom, LE. Thrombosis of microvascular anastomoses in traumatized vessels: fibrin versus platelets. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:110–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savoie, FH, Cooley, BC, Gould, JS. Valuation of the effect of pharmacologic agents on crush-avulsion arterial injuries: a scanning electron microscopy study. Microsurgery 1991;12:29230010.1002/micr.1920120413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahl, V, Shuman, AG, Hu, HM, Jackson, CR, Pannucci, CJ, Alaniz, C et al. Chemoprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in otolaryngology. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140:999100510.1001/jamaoto.2014.2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, XL, Chen, GX, Shao, HW, Han, CM, Zhang, LP, Zhi, LZ. Effect of heparin on prevention of flap loss in microsurgical free flap transfer: a meta-analysis. PloS One 2014;9(4):e95111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, TK, Java, KR, Lowe, D, Brown, JS, Rogers, SN. Safety of a regimen for thromboprophylaxis in head and neck cancer microvascular reconstructive surgery: non-concurrent cohort study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:227–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eley, KA, Parker, RJ, Watt-Smith, SR. Low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing free tissue transfer following head and neck ablative surgery: review of efficacy and associated complications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:610–1410.1016/j.bjoms.2013.01.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khouri, RK, Cooley, BC, Kunselman, AR, Landis, JR, Yeramian, P, Ingram, D et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:711–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glicksman, A, Ferder, M, Casale, P, Posner, J, Kim, R, Strauch, B. 1457 years of microsurgical experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:355–6310.1097/00006534-199708000-00012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caprini, JA. Risk assessment as a guide for the prevention of the many faces of venous thromboembolism. Am J Surg 2010;199:S310.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroll, SS, Miller, MJ, Reece, GP, Baldwin, BJ, Robb, GL, Bengtson, BP et al. Anticoagulants and hematomas in free flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;96:643–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Outcome following pedicled flap reconstruction

Figure 1

Table 2. Baseline characteristics of Arm A (LMWH arm) and Arm B (control arm)

Figure 2

Figure 1. Pie chart depicting primary outcome analysis. (a) The difference between the two study arms in terms of reversal or non-progression of venous congestion. (b) The difference between the two study arms in terms of final flap viability at four weeks. Arrows are for showing a breakup of the number of cases depicted in the shaded area

Figure 3

Figure 2. Before and after intervention images from Arm A. Before (a) and after (b) images of a congested pectoralis major myocutaneous flap used for skin coverage after radical parotidectomy showing complete reversal of congestion at 72 hours. Before (c) and after (d) images of an infrahyoid flap repair following compartment glossectomy showing non-progression of the congested area at four weeks post-operatively. Before (e) and after (f) images of a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap following subtotal glossectomy showing complete resolution of the congested area five days post-operatively. Before (g) and after (h) images of a bipaddle pectoralis major myocutaneous flap repair following full-thickness excision, segmental mandibulectomy and infratemporal fossa clearance showing the non-progression of congestion and partial necrosis of the congested area at four weeks

Figure 4

Table 3. Univariate analysis