Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T15:28:39.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring dynamic Eustachian tube function using tympanometry in a pressure chamber: the effect of nasal betahistine application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2019

B K-H G Franz ,
R Patuzzi ,
C J Wraight ,
G Kay ,
A Ng  and
C R Anderson
B K-H G Franz
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Australia
R Patuzzi
Affiliation:
Physiology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
C J Wraight
Affiliation:
Otifex Therapeutics, Melbourne, Australia
G Kay
Affiliation:
Wesley Centre for Hyperbaric Medicine, Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
A Ng
Affiliation:
Wesley Centre for Hyperbaric Medicine, Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
C R Anderson*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Dr C R Anderson, Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia E-mail: c.anderson@unimelb.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of topical betahistine on Eustachian tube function in subjectively abnormal subjects in a hyperbaric chamber.

Method

Active and passive Eustachian tube function was examined using tympanometry in a pressure chamber.

Results

Active Eustachian tube function was tested against the negative middle ear pressure induced by increasing the chamber pressure to +3 kPa. One voluntary swallow decreased middle-ear pressure by a mean of 1.36 kPa. Passive Eustachian tube function was tested by measuring spontaneous Eustachian tube openings as the chamber pressure dropped from +10 kPa to ambient. Four distinct patterns of Eustachian tube behaviour were seen, three of which indicated Eustachian tube dysfunction. Betahistine had no positive effect on Eustachian tube opening, although previous animal studies had suggested a beneficial effect.

Conclusion

Topical betahistine had no effect on Eustachian tube function. Combining a hyperbaric chamber with tympanometry proved ideal for evaluating Eustachian tube function.

Keywords

Eustachian TubeAcoustic Impedance TestsBetahistineEar, MiddlePressure
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 7 , July 2019 , pp. 580 - 587
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr C R Anderson takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Franz, B, Shafton, AD, Anderson, CR. Topical application of betahistine improves Eustachian tube function in an animal model. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:1155–9Google Scholar
2Lacour, M, Sterkers, O. Histamine and betahistine in the treatment of vertigo: elucidation of mechanisms of action. CNS Drugs 2001;15:853–70Google Scholar
3Silver, R, Poonwasi, K, Seyedi, N, Wilson, S, Lovenberg, T, Levi, R. Decreased intracellular calcium mediates the histamine H3-receptor-induced attenuation of norepinephrine exocytosis from cardiac sympathetic nerve endings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:501–6Google Scholar
4Martino, E, Di Thaden, R, Krombach, GA, Westhofen, M. Function tests for the Eustachian tube. Current knowledge [in German]. HNO 2004;52:1029–39Google Scholar
5Münker, G. Functional Analysis of the Eustachian Tube – Methodology and Clinic [in German]. Freiburg im Breisgau: University of Freiburg, 1972Google Scholar
6Kitahara, M, Kodama, A, Ozawa, H, Izukura, H, Inoue, S. Test for pressure control capacity of the Eustachian tube. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;510:96–8Google Scholar
7Kodama, A, Kitahara, M, Ozawa, H, Izukura, H. A ventilation capacity test for the Eustachian tube using a soundproof pressure chamber. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994;510:99–103Google Scholar
8Varty, LM, Gustafson, E, Laverty, M, Hey, JA. Activation of histamine H3 receptors in human nasal mucosa inhibits sympathetic vasoconstriction. Eur J Pharmacol 2004;484:83–9Google Scholar
9Arrang, JM, Morisset, S, Gbahou, F. Constitutive activity of the histamine H3 receptor. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2007;28:350–7Google Scholar
10Gbahou, F, Davenas, E, Morisset, S, Arrang, JM. Effects of betahistine at histamine H3 receptors: mixed inverse agonism/agonism in vitro and partial inverse agonism in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2010;334:945–54Google Scholar
11Shelton, D, Eiser, N. Histamine receptors in the human nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1994;19:45–9Google Scholar
12Arrang, JM, Garbarg, M, Quach, TT, Dam Trung Tuong, M, Yeramian, E, Schwartz, JC. Actions of betahistine at histamine receptors in the brain. Eur J Pharmacol 1985;111:73–84Google Scholar
13Downs, BW, Butehorn, HF 3rd, Prazma, J, Rose, AS, Stamat, JC, Pillsbury, HC 3rd. Action of histamine on eustachian tube function. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:414–20Google Scholar
14Doyle, WJ, Ingraham, AS, Fireman, P. The effects of intranasal histamine challenge on Eustachian tube function. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985;76:551–6Google Scholar
15Ebert, CS Jr, Pollock, HW, Dubin, MG, Scharer, SS, Prazma, J, McQueen, CT et al. Effect of intranasal histamine challenge on Eustachian tube function. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002;63:189–98Google Scholar
16Thomsen, KA. Investigations on the tubal function and measurement of the middle ear pressure in pressure chamber. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1958;140:269–78Google Scholar
17Maier, W, Hauser, R, Munker, G. Eustachian tube function in sudden hearing loss and in healthy subjects. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:322–6Google Scholar
18Maier, W, Munker, G, Strutz, J. Topical anesthesia of the tympanic membrane and tubal function--is there a correlation? [In German]. Laryngorhinootologie 1993;72:39–42Google Scholar
19Maier, W, Beck, C, Hinkelbein, W, Richter, B. Effects of therapy of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers on eustachian tube function [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 1994;73:164–8Google Scholar
20Miyazawa, T, Ueda, H, Yanagita, N. Eustachian tube function and middle ear barotrauma associated with extremes in atmospheric pressure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:887–92Google Scholar
21Mikolajczak, S, Meyer, MF, Felsch, M, Jumah, MD, Huttenbrink, KB, Grosheva, M et al. Is there a difference between active opening of the Eustachian tube in a hypobaric surrounding compared to a hyperbaric surrounding? Undersea Hyperb Med 2015;42:593–9Google Scholar
22Mikolajczak, S, Meyer, MF, Hahn, M, Korthauer, C, Jumah, MD, Huttenbrink, KB et al. Characterizing the active opening of the Eustachian tube in a hypobaric/hyperbaric pressure chamber. Otol Neurotol 2015;36:70–5Google Scholar
23Ingelstedt, S, Ortegren, U. The ear snorkel--pressure chamber technique. Volumetric determinations of tubal ventilation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1963;182:24–34Google Scholar