Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T12:41:04.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microscope and hot wire cautery management of 100 consecutive patients with acute epistaxis — a superior method to traditional packing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

S. M. Quine ,
R. F. Gray ,
M. Rudd  and
H. von Blumenthal
S. M. Quine*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
R. F. Gray
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
M. Rudd
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
H. von Blumenthal
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
*
Dr Stuart Quine, B.Med. Sc., B.M., B.S., Department of ENT, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The technique of microscope examination and hot wire cautery in a prospective study of 100 consecutive patients with acute epistaxis is described. The method was successful in arresting haemorrhage in 94 per cent of patients bleeding at the time of examination, and in 86 per cent, discharge home within one hour was possible. Due to improved illumination, magnification and control of the cautery instrument, nasal packing was required in only nine per cent of cases. By achieving this and by reducing the overall need for admission to 20 per cent, we recommend this method of treatment both as a successful cost saving measure, as well as advantageous to the patient.

Keywords

Epistaxis, treatment
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 108 , Issue 10 , October 1994 , pp. 845 - 848
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borgstein, J. A. (1987) Epistaxis and the flexible nasopharyngoscope. Clinical Otolaryngology 12: 49–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, D. E., Stoller, K. P. (1983) Intranasal airway pack: description of a new device. Laryngoscope 93: 808–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doyle, D. E. (1986) Anterior epistaxis: a new nasal tampon for fast effective control. Laryngoscope 96: 279–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, J. N. (1971) Cryotherapy for severe posterior nasal epistaxis. Clinical and experimental study. Laryngoscope 81: 1881–1902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juselius, H. (1974) Epistaxis Journal of Laryngology and Otology 88: 317–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludman, H. (1981) ABC of ENT: nose bleeds. British Medical Journal 282: 967–969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monux, A., Tomas, M., Kaiser, C., Gavilan, J. (1990) Conservative management of epistaxis. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 104: 868–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicolaides, A., Gray, R., Pfleiderer, A. (1991) A new approach to the management of acute epistaxis. Clinical Otolaryngology 16: 59–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okafor, B. C. (1984) Epistaxis: a clinical study of 540 cases. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 63: 38–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Padgham, N. (1990) Epistaxis: anatomical and clinical correlates. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 104: 308–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, A. J., Clegg, R. f. (1990) How to control epistaxis. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 44: 198–200.Google ScholarPubMed
Premachandra, D. J. (1991) Management of posterior epistaxis with the use of the fibreoptic nasolaryngoscope. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105: 17–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stell, P. M. (1977) Review: epistaxis. Clinical Otolaryngology 2: 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar