Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hogg, R. P.
Prior, M. J.
and
Johnson, A. P.
1999.
Admission rates, early readmission rates and patient acceptability of 142 cases of day case septoplasty.
Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 3,
p.
213.
Singh, VP
and
Kalra, SP
2004.
Day Care Surgery in Otolaryngology : a three year Prospective Study.
Medical Journal Armed Forces India,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Singh, Gurminder
McCormack, David
and
Roberts, David R
2004.
Readmission and overstay after day case nasal surgery.
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
Hytönen, M.
Blomgren, K.
Lilja, M.
and
Mäkitie, A.A.
2006.
How we do it: Septoplasties under local anaesthetic are suitable for short stay surgery; the clinical outcomes.
Clinical Otolaryngology,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
64.
Georgalas, Christos
Obholzer, Rupert
Martinez-Devesa, P
and
Sandhu, G
2006.
Day-Case Septoplasty and Unexpected Re-Admissions at a Dedicated Day-Case Unit: A 4-Year Audit.
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England,
Vol. 88,
Issue. 2,
p.
202.
Dursun, Engin
and
Battal, Bilal
2009.
Clinical outcomes of nasal septal surgery at high altitude.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology,
Vol. 266,
Issue. 10,
p.
1579.
Sathyaki, D. C.
Geetha, Chary
Munishwara, G. B.
Mohan, M.
and
Manjuanth, K.
2014.
A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Septoplasty Versus Conventional Septoplasty.
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 2,
p.
155.
de Gabory, L.
Serrano, E.
Lecanu, J.-B.
Ébbo, D.
Coudert, F.
Hanau, M.
and
Escabasse, V.
2015.
Recommandations de la SFORL sur la chirurgie ambulatoire en rhinologie.
Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale,
Vol. 132,
Issue. 1,
p.
32.
Al-Hussaini, Ali
Walijee, Hussein
Khan, Anwar
and
Cuddihy, Patrick
2015.
Day-case septoplasty: a default pathway or is case selection the key?.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology,
Vol. 272,
Issue. 1,
p.
91.
de Gabory, L.
Serrano, E.
Lecanu, J.-B.
Ebbo, D.
Coudert, F.
Hanau, M.
and
Escabasse, V.
2015.
French otorhinolaryngology society guidelines for day-case nasal surgery.
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases,
Vol. 132,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
Al-Hussaini, A
Walijee, H
and
Owens, D
2016.
The uptake of day-case septoplasty in England and Wales.
The Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,
Vol. 98,
Issue. 5,
p.
212.
Menezes, Ana Sousa
Guimarães, Joana R.
Breda, Miguel
Vieira, Vicente
and
Dias, Luís
2018.
Septal and turbinate surgery: is overnight essential?.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology,
Vol. 275,
Issue. 1,
p.
131.
Chen, Yung-Yuan
and
Huang, Tzu-Chin
2019.
Outcome of Septoplasty with Inferior Turbinectomy as an In-patient or Out-patient Procedure.
Scientific Reports,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
C.G, Jayachandran
James, Naiji S.
and
P.R, Ushakumari
2020.
Effect of Pre-Anaesthetic Evaluation on Complication Free Outcome among Day-Care ENT Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 50,
p.
3016.
Samarei, R.
and
Mabarian, S.
2020.
A randomised trial comparing the subjective outcomes following septoplasty with or without inferior turbinoplasty.
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 4,
p.
277.
Samarei, R.
and
Mabarian, S.
2020.
Étude randomisée comparant les résultats subjectifs de patients ayant subi une septoplastie avec ou sans turbinoplastie.
Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale,
Vol. 137,
Issue. 4,
p.
256.
C.G, Jayachandran
Sahadevan, Sanjay
and
M.S, Sandhya
2020.
Effect of Analgesia on Complication Free Postoperative Outcome among Day-Care ENT Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 49,
p.
2923.
Cîrpaciu, Daniela
Goanţă, Cristina-Maria
and
Budu, Vlad Andrei
2022.
Septal incision types. Advantages and disadvantages.
ORL.ro,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 56,
p.
28.