We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
(1)
(1)Jacod, .—“Le traitement conservateur dans les otites moyennes suppurées clironiques,” Ann. des Mal. de l'Oreille, 02, 1909.Google Scholar
(2)
(2)Botey, R.—“Vaciamento conservador del oïdo en las otorreas eronicas,” Rev. esp. de Laryng., etc., 07–08, 1910.Google Scholar
(3)
(3)Heath, .—“The Duty of Restoring Hearing by Operation in Chronic Aural Suppuration,” Ann. of Otol., etc., 09, 1907.Google ScholarPubMed
(4)
(4)Urbantschitch, .—“Radical Operation with Preservation of the Ossicles, of the Tympanic Membrane and the Lateral Wall of the Attic,” Soc. autr. d'Otol., 02 24, 1908.Google Scholar
(5)
(5)Botey, . Loc. cit., and Budapest Congress, 1909.Google Scholar
(6)
(6)Turner, L..—“Two Patients after the Mastoid Operation with Preservation of the Tympanic Membrane and Ossicles,” Rev. Hebd. de Laryng., 02 13, 1909, No. 7.Google Scholar
(7)
(7)Bondy, .—“Presentation of a Case of Chronic Otorrhoea; Fistula Symptoms; Total Trephining with Preservation of the Ossicles; Cure,” Soc. autr. d'Otol., 10 26, 1908, and 10 25, 1909; Monats.f. Ohrenheilk., Jg. 44, H. 2.Google Scholar
(8)
(8)Bárány, .—“Radical Operation with Presex-vation of the Tympanic Membrane and Ossicular Chain,” Intern. Centr. Ohr., 04, 1910.Google Scholar
(9)
(9)Smith, MacCuen.—“Exhibition of Cases Illustrating the Results of the so-called Heath Operation,” Rev. Hebd., 03 12, 1910, No. 11.Google Scholar
(10)
(10)Porter, W. G.—“An Unusual Sequel to the Radical Mastoid Operation,” Rev. Hebd. de Laryng., 02 13, 1910, No. 7.Google Scholar