Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:42:30.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prevalence and severity of external auditory exostoses in breath-hold divers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2008

P W Sheard*
Affiliation:
School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
M Doherty
Affiliation:
School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Peter W Sheard, Division of Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, C212 Park Square, University of Bedfordshire, Luton LUI 3JU, UK. E-mail: peter.sheard@beds.ac.uk

Abstract

Objective:

To explore the prevalence and severity of external auditory exostoses in a population of experienced breath-hold divers, and to compare these to the same parameters within surfing and self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving populations.

Design:

A stepwise, multiple regression analysis of cross-sectional data examining the relative contributions of sea surface temperature, latitude of exposure and years of exposure to the prevalence and severity of stenosis due to external auditory exostoses. A chi-square analysis of the prevalence and severity of external auditory exostosis stenosis in the breath-hold divers was compared with previously published data for surfers and self-contained underwater breathing apparatus divers.

Subjects:

Seventy-six male and thirty-five female breath-hold divers attending an international ‘freedive’ competition completed a questionnaire describing aquatic sports habits, geography of participation and symptomatology. Those completing the questionnaire (111/154 attendees) were examined otoscopically for evidence of external auditory exostoses. Images were digitally recorded, scored and graded.

Results:

Exostoses were evident in 87.7 per cent of the 204 ears scored and graded for severity of stenosis due to external auditory exostoses. The prevalence of exostoses was no different from that found in previous studies of surfers and self-contained underwater breathing apparatus divers (p = 0.101). However, the pattern of affliction was more similar to that found in surfers. The severity of exostoses was significantly less than that found in surfing populations (p ≤ 0.001 to 0.007), but greater than that found in self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving populations (p ≤ 0.001). Sea surface temperature at the location of open-water exposure was the most significant predictor of the prevalence and severity of external auditory exostoses in breath-hold divers (p = 0.019).

Conclusion:

The prevalence and severity patterns of stenosis due to external auditory exostoses in breath-hold divers are more similar to previously published results for surfing populations than to previously published results for self-contained underwater breathing apparatus diving populations. In breath-hold divers, sea surface temperature is the strongest predictor of severity of stenosis due to external auditory exostoses.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented in part at the 35th Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Scientific Meeting, 28–30 June 2002, San Diego, California, USA.

Published in part as Sheard PW. Exostoses of the external auditory canal in competitive breath-hold divers. Undersea Hyperb Med 2002;29:69.

References

1 Fowler, EP, Osmun, PM. New bone growth due to cold water in the ears. Arch Otolaryngol 1942;36:455–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Harrison, DFN. The relationship of osteomata of the external auditory meatus to swimming. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1962;31:187201Google ScholarPubMed
3 Seftel, DM. Ear canal hyperostosis – surfer's ear. Arch Otolaryngol 1977;103:5860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Kennedy, GE. The relationship between auditory exostoses and cold water: a latitudinal analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 1986;71:401–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Umeda, Y, Nakajima, M, Yoshioka, H. ‘Surfer's ear’ in Japan. Laryngoscope 1989;99:639–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Deleyiannis, FW, Cockcroft, BD, Pinczower, EF. Exostoses of the auditory canal in Oregon surfers. Am J Otolaryngol 1996;17:303–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Chaplin, JM, Stewart, IA. The prevalence of exostoses in the external auditory meatus of surfers. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998;23:326–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Wong, BJF, Cervantes, W, Doyle, KJ, Karamzadeh, AM, Boys, P, Brauel, G et al. Prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in surfers. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;125:969–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Kroon, DF, Lawson, ML, Derkay, CS, Hoffmann, K, McCook, J. Surfer's ear: external auditory exostoses are more prevalent in cold water surfers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:499504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Hurst, W, Bailey, M, Hurst, B. Incidence of external auditory canal exostoses in Australian surfboard riders. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:348–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Karegeannes, JC. Incidence of bony outgrowths of the external ear canal in U.S. Navy divers. Undersea Hyperb Med 1995;22:301–6Google ScholarPubMed
12 Ito, M, Ikeda, M. Does cold water truly promote diver's ear? Undersea Hyperb Med 1998;25:5962Google ScholarPubMed
13 Fabiani, M, Barbara, M, Filipo, R. External ear canal exostoses and aquatic sports. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1984;46:159–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14 National Oceanographic Data Center. http://www.nodc.noaa.gov/dsdt/oisst/oisstmon.htm [26 September 2006]Google Scholar
15 Di Bartolomeo, JR. Exostoses of the external auditory canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979;88(suppl 61):120Google ScholarPubMed
16 Professional Association of Dive Instructors. Instructor Manual. Bristol: PADI International, 2001Google Scholar
17 Hopkins, WG. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000;30:115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Barnett, V, Lewis, T. Outliers in Statistical Data, 3rd edn. London: John Wiley, 1994Google Scholar
19 Harris, M. Personal communication. November 14, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar