Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:04:45.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiofrequency dissection versus ‘knot tying’ in conventional total thyroidectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

M H Ozkul ,
R M Açikalin ,
H H Balikci ,
O Bayram  and
AA Bayram
M H Ozkul
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
R M Açikalin
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
H H Balikci*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Susehri State Hospital, Sivas, Turkey
O Bayram
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
AA Bayram
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr H H Balikci, Suşehri Devlet Hastanesi, Kulak Burun Bogaz Klinigi, 58600 Suşehri, Sivas, Turkey Fax: +90 346 311 48 03 E-mail: balikcient@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency dissection in conventional ‘open’ total thyroidectomy.

Methods:

Thirty-nine patients scheduled for conventional total thyroidectomy were included in a prospective randomised study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a radiofrequency dissection method was used in one group, and a knot tying technique was used in the other.

Results:

Significantly fewer surgical instruments and materials were required for the radiofrequency dissection group than the knot tying group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean operative time, blood loss, post-operative drainage and pain, recurrent palsy, and hypocalcaemia (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Radiofrequency dissection is a safe alternative to the knot tying technique, and enables a significant reduction in the number of surgical instruments required for the operation.

Keywords

ThyroidectomyThyroid GlandGoiterCarcinomaPapillary
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 9 , September 2014 , pp. 818 - 823
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Duh, QY. Minimally invasive endocrine surgery: Standard of treatment or hype? Surgery 2003;134:849–57Google Scholar
2Duh, QY. What's new in general surgery: endocrine surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:746–53Google Scholar
3Martin, RR, Sbar, A. Regional anesthesia and thyroidectomy: local anesthesia for thyroidectomies?. Curr Surg 2002;59:517–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Meurisse, M, Defechereux, T, Maweja, S, Degauque, C, Vandelaer, M, Hamoir, E. Evaluation of the Ultracision ultrasonic dissector in thyroid surgery. Prospective randomized study [in French]. Ann Chir 2000;125:468–72Google ScholarPubMed
5Voutilainen, PE, Haglund, CH. Ultrasonically activated shears in thyroidectomies. A randomised trial. Ann Surg 2000;231:322–8Google Scholar
6Siperstein, A, Berber, E, Morkoyun, E. The use of the harmonic scalpel vs conventional knot tying for vessel ligation in thyroid surgery. Arch Surg 2002;137:137–42Google Scholar
7Shemen, L. Thyroidectomy using the harmonic scalpel: analysis of 105 consecutive cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;127:284–8Google Scholar
8Ortega, J, Sala, C, Flor, B, Lledo, S. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the UltraCision harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: an analysis of 200 cases in a randomised trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2004;14:9–12Google Scholar
9Miccoli, P, Berti, P, Raffaelli, M, Materazzi, G, Conte, M, Galleri, D. Impact of the harmonic scalpel on the operation time during video-assisted thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:663–6Google Scholar
10Cordón, C, Fajardo, R, Ramírez, J, Herrera, MF. A randomised, prospective, parallel group study comparing the harmonic scalpel to electrocautery in thyroidectomy. Surgery 2005;137:337–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Terris, DJ, Seybt, MW, Gourin, CG, Chin, E. Ultrasonic technology facilitates minimal thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope 2006;116:851–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Miccoli, P, Berti, P, Dionigi Gian, L, D'Agostino, J, Orlandini, C, Donatini, G. Randomized controlled trial of harmonic scalpel use during thyroidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:1069–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Koutsoumanis, K, Koutras, AS, Drimousis, PG, Stamou, KM, Theodorou, D, Katsaragakis, S et al. The use of a harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery: report of a 3-year experience. Am J Surg 2007;193:693–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Petrakis, I, Kogerakis, NE, Lasithiotakis, KG, Vrachassotakis, N, Chalkiadakis, GE. Ligasure versus clamp-and-tie thyroidectomy for benign nodular disease. Head Neck 2004;26:903–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Kiriakopoulos, A, Tsakayannis, D, Linos, D. Use of a diathermy system in thyroid surgery. Arch Surg 2004;139:997–1000Google Scholar
16Shen, WT, Baumbusch, MA, Kebebew, E, Duh, QY. Use of the electrothermal vessel sealing system versus standard vessel ligation in thyroidectomy. Asian J Surg 2005;28:86–9Google Scholar
17Lachanas, VA, Prokopakis, EP, Mpenakis, AA, Karatzanis, AD, Velegrakis, GA. The use of ligasure vessel sealing system in thyroid surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;132:487–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Kirdak, T, Korun, N, Ozguc, H. Use of ligasure in thyroidectomy procedures: results of a prospective comparative study. World J Surg 2005;25:771–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Franko, J, Kish, KJ, Pezzi, CM, Pak, HO. Safely increasing the efficiency of thyroidectomy using a new bipolar electrosealing device (Ligasure) versus conventional clamp-and-tie technique. Am Surg 2006;72:132–6Google Scholar
20Frias, S. A new device for treating laryngeal carcinoma using micro-dissection electrodes. Laryngoscope 2006;116:2232–4Google Scholar
21Basterra, J. Comparative study of acute damage by CO2 laser versus micro-dissection electrode in chordectomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;135:933–6Google Scholar
22Sadri, M, McMahon, J, Parker, A. Management of laryngeal dysplasia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:843–52.Google Scholar
23Bellantone, R, Lombardi, CP, Bossola, M, Boscherini, M, De Crea, C, Alesina, PF et al. Total thyroidectomy for management of benign thyroid disease: a review of 526 cases. World J Surg 2002;26:1468–71Google Scholar
24Rosato, L, Avenia, N, Bernante, P, De Palma, M, Gulino, G, Nasi, PG et al. Complications of thyroid surgery: analysis of a multicentric study on 14,934 patients operated on in Italy over 5 years. World J Surg 2004;28:271–6Google Scholar