Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:48:23.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Report of Committee for the Consideration of Hearing Tests Part II*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bansister, H., “Auditory Theory; Criticism of Professor Boring's Hypotheses,” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 1927, xxxviii., 436–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlman, A.C., “Theories of Sound Analysis and Intensity Control on Basis of Middle and Inner Ear Mechancis,” Ann. Otol. Rhin. and Laryng., 1927, xxxvi., 579603;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pohlman, A.C., “Theories of Sound Analysis and Intensity Control on Basis of Middle and Inner Ear Mechancis,” Ann. Otol. Rhin. and Laryng., 1927, and xxxiii., 484504.Google Scholar
Tastet, D.W., “Statistical Study of Relation between Appearance of Tympanic Memberane and Impairment of Auditory Function,” U.S. Vet. Bull., 1927, iii., 1039–49.Google Scholar
Macfarlane, D.Distinguishing between Tactile Sense and Audition in Deaf Child,” Arch. Oto-laryng., 1927, v., 507–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonnenschein, R., “Recent Literature on Cranial Resonance and ist Clinical Application,” Ann. Oto. Rhin., etc., 1927, xxxvi., 454–62.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. P.Marked Deafness Areas in Normal Ears,” Arch. Oto-laryng., 1928, viii., 151–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emerson, F.P., “Mooted Points in Sound Conduction and Perception during Course of chronic progressive Deafness,” Laryngoscope, 1928, xxxviii., 185–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattie, F. A. Jr., “An Experimental Study of Fatigue in the Auditory Mechansim,” Amer. Journ. Psychol., 19278, xxxviii., 3958.Google Scholar
Flugel, J. C., “On Local Fatigue in the Auditory System,” Brit. Journ. Psychol., 1920–21, xi., 105–34.Google Scholar
Bartlett, F.C., and Mark, H., “A Note on Local Fatigue in the Auditory System,” Brit. Journ. Psychol. 1922–3, xiii., 215–8.Google Scholar
Wells, W. A.The Influence of Sounds of Different Pitch, Duration and Intensity in the Production of Auditory Fatigue,” Laryngoscope, 1913, xxiii., 989–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Rayleigh, Phil. Mag., 1907, sec, 6, vol, xiii., pp. 214, 231.Google Scholar
Bunch, C. C., “Auditory Acuity after Removal of entire Right Cerebral Hemisphere,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1928, xc., 2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmholtz, , Pfiüger's Arch., i., 1868.Google Scholar
Fernetm, Ch., Sem. médicale, 1911.Google Scholar
Venturi, C. B.Reil's Arch., v., 1802.Google Scholar
Preyer, , Pfiüger's Arch., Xi., 1887.Google Scholar
Luciani, L., “Human Physiology,” Translated by Frances A. Welby, London, 1917, iv., 264–5.Google Scholar
Graham, Brown, “Binaural Localisation of Sound,” Journ, of Physiol., 1910, xi., 1.Google Scholar
Rich, , “A Preliminary Study of Tonal Volume,” Journ. of Exper. Psychol., 1916, i., 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, , “ Psychological Analysis and the Theory of Hearing,” Brit Journ. of Psychol., 1914, vii., 1.Google Scholar
Sonnenschein, R., “Rationale of Tuning-fork Tests, ” Ann. Otol. Rhin., etc., 1928, xxxvii., 309–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, E. P., “Limitations in Differential Diagnosis of Deafness,” Trans, Amer.Laryng.Rhin., etc., 1927, xxxiii., 332–44.Google Scholar
Drury, D. W. and Gallivan, D. E., “Quality Hearing,” Ann. Otol. Rhin., etc., 1928 xxxvii., 661–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostmann, , Arch. f. Anal. u. Physiol. Phys. Abt., 1899.Google Scholar