Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:36:18.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Subannular tube insertion: anatomical considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2015

A K Guidera
Affiliation:
ORLHNS Department, Christchurch Public Hospital, New Zealand
L Benoiton
Affiliation:
Department of Plastic Surgery, Hutt Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
L McManus
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
P J D Dawes*
Affiliation:
Department of Surgical Sciences, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand
*
Address for correspondence: Assoc Prof P J D Dawes, ORLHNS Department, Dunedin Hospital, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin, New Zealand Fax: 00 64 3 474 7956 E-mail: patrick.dawes@southerndhb.govt.nz

Abstract

Objectives:

To assess the distance between the bony groove created during subannular tubes placement and the chorda tympani, and examine the depth of the hypotympanum and retrotympanum.

Method:

Grooves drilled in cadaver temporal bones at two levels were imaged to measure: the distance between the chorda tympani nerve and the tympanic sulcus, and the depth of the hypotympanum and the retrotympanum relative to the annulus.

Results:

The chorda tympani was between 0 and 5 mm from the groove cut across the annulus. The hypotympanum average depth was 2 mm (0.44–6.40 mm) and the retrotympanum average depth was 1 mm (0–2.53 mm).

Conclusion:

Grooves drilled across the tympanic sulcus should be placed at a point 20 per cent of the height of the tympanic membrane or lower; this will ensure least risk of injury to the chorda tympani nerve. The depth of the hypotympanum and retrotympanum dictates that the posteroinferior part of a subannular tube flange should be approximately 2 × 1 mm.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the 65th Annual and General Scientific Meeting of the New Zealand Society of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, 31 October 2012–2 November 2012, Wellington, New Zealand, and at the Australian Society of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2013 Annual Scientific Meeting, 16–20 March 2013, Perth, Australia.

References

1McLelland, CA. Incidence of complications from use of tympanostomy tubes. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:97–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Klingensmith, MR, Strauss, M, Connor, GH. A comparison of retention and complication rates of large-bore (Paparella II) and small-bore middle ear ventilating tubes. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:322–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Kim, DS, Moore, PL, Rockley, TJ. Long-term Paparella II grommet use in the management of persistent otitis media: a 5-year follow-up study. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:553–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Kay, DJ, Nelson, M, Rosenfeld, RM. Meta-analysis of tympanostomy tube sequelae. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:374–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Strachan, D, Hope, G, Hussein, M. Long-term follow-up of children inserted with T-tubes as a primary procedure for otitis media with effusion. Clin Otolaryngol 1996;21:537–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Vlastarakos, PV, Nikolopoulos, TP, Korres, S, Tavoulari, E, Tzagaroulakis, A, Ferekidis, E. Grommets in otitis media with effusion: the most frequent operation in children. But is it associated with significant complications? Eur J Pediatr 2007;166:385–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Simonton, KM. Ventilation tympanotomy. Tunnel technique. Arch Otolaryngol 1968;87:644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Silverstein, H. Permanent middle ear aeration. Arch Otolaryngol 1970;91:313–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Jahn, AF. A biointegrated hydroxylapatite ventilation tube for definitive treatment of chronic eustachian tube dysfunction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991;105:757–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Duadia, A, Yelavich, S, Dawes, PJ. Long-term middle-ear ventilation with subannular tubes. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:945–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Martin-Hirsch, P, Woodhead, CJ, Vize, CE. Long-term ventilation of the middle ear using a tympanotomy technique. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:1151–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Elluru, RG, Dhanda, R, Neely, JG, Goebel, JA. Anterior subannular T-tube for prolonged middle ear ventilation during tympanoplasty: evaluation of efficacy and complications. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:761–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Al-Swadi, W, Karlsmose, B, Gaihede, M, Henriksen, SD, Rosberg, J. Long-term treatment of chronic eustachian tube dysfunction by subannular ventilation tubes. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:301Google Scholar
14Jassar, P, Coatesworth, A, Strachan, DR. Long-term ventilation of the middle ear using a sub-annular tympanotomy technique: a follow-up study. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:933–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Saliba, I, Boutin, T, Arcand, P, Freohlich, P, Abela, A. Advantages of subannular tube vs repetitive transtympanic tube technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137:1210–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16McManus, LJ, Dawes, PJ, Stringer, MD. Surgical anatomy of the chorda tympani: a micro-CT study. Surg Radiol Anat 2012;34:513–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Ott, I, Tebben, H, Losenhause, H, Issing, PR. Anatomical course of the chorda tympani nerve in middle ear surgery: clinical classification and relevance for postoperative gustatory dysfunction [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 2009;88:592–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Haberkamp, TJ, Silverstein, HL. Permanent middle ear aeration: long-term follow-up of transosseous ventilating tubes. Laryngoscope 1987;97:1145–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Goplan, P, Kumar, M, Gupta, D, Phillips, JJ. A study of chorda tympani nerve injury and related symptoms following middle-ear surgery. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:189–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Michael, P, Raut, V. Chorda tympani injury: operative findings and postoperative symptoms. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:978–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed