Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:46:09.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surfers' awareness of the preventability of ‘surfer's ear’ and use of water precautions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

V M Reddy*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
T Abdelrahman
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
A Lau
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
P M Flanagan
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr V M Reddy, ENT Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 3LJ, UK E-mail: vmreddy@doctors.net.uk

Abstract

Objective:

To establish surfers' knowledge of the preventability of external auditory canal exostoses (‘surfer's ear’), and their use of water precautions.

Method:

Survey of surfers conducted between December 2009 and March 2010 at beaches in Cornwall, UK.

Results:

Ninety-two surfers were included (78 males and 14 females, mean age 27 years, standard deviation 7.9 years). Participants were grouped according to their awareness of the preventability of surfer's ear (55 aware, 37 unaware). These groups were comparable in age, surfing history and gender mix (p > 0.05). Surfers aware of the preventability of exostoses (66 per cent) were more likely to use water precautions than those who were not (38 per cent) (p < 0.01). Two surfers used water precautions regularly and 48 used them occasionally. Sixty-one of the 76 surfers who did not use water precautions (ear plugs) suggested they would consider doing so in the future.

Conclusion:

Awareness of the preventability of surfer's ear was associated with greater use of water precautions. Further research should explore reasons for the low uptake of such precautions. Most surfers not already using ear plugs would consider doing so in the future.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the South West ENT Academic Meeting, 4 June 2010, Bath, UK

References

1Timofeev, I, Notkina, N, Smith, IM. Exostoses of the external auditory canal: a long-term follow-up study of surgical treatment. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:588–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Zoltan, TB, Taylor, KS, Achar, SA. Health issues for surfers. Am Fam Phys 2005;71:2313–17Google ScholarPubMed
3Chaplin, JM, Stewart, IA. The prevalence of exostoses in the external auditory meatus of surfers. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1998;23:326–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Hurst, W, Bailey, M, Hurst, B. Prevalence of external auditory canal exostoses in Australian surfboard riders. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:348–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Umeda, Y, Nakajima, M, Yoshioka, H. Surfer's ear in Japan. Laryngoscope 1989;99:639–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Deleyiannis, FW, Cockcroft, BD, Pinczower, EF. Exostoses of the external auditory canal in Oregon surfers. Am J Otolaryngol 1996;17:303–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Harrison, DFN. The relationship of osteomata of the external auditory meatus to swimming. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1962;31:187201Google ScholarPubMed
8DiBartolomeo, JR. Exostoses of the external auditory canal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979;88(suppl 61):120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Seftel, DM. Ear canal hyperostosis – surfer's ear. An improved surgical technique. Arch Otolaryngol 1977;103:5860CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Hetzler, DG. Osteotome technique for removal of symptomatic ear canal exostoses. Laryngoscope 2007;117:114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Hurst, WB. A review of 64 operations for removal of exostoses of the external ear canal. Aust J Otolaryngol 2001;4:187–90Google Scholar