Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:35:22.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Z-plasty for skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2015

M S Miura
Affiliation:
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Hospital da Criança Santo Antonio, Porto Alegre, Brazil Department of Medical Surgery, Universidade Federal de Ciencias da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
M N Rios*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Surgery, Universidade Federal de Ciencias da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Matheus Nardi Rios, Rua Prof Annes Dias, 295 (Centro) 90020-160 Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil Fax: +55 (51) 9790 9320 E-mail: riosmatheus@hotmail.com

Abstract

Background:

The bone-anchored hearing aid implantation technique is associated with post-operative skin reactions, which require conservative therapy and, in some cases, replacement of the abutment. Z-plasty is a technique that allows resection of the granulation tissue, thus ensuring that disease-free skin will be in contact with the abutment.

Case report:

Use of the Z-plasty technique for resection of the peri-abutment granulation tissue is described. In the case presented herein, the episodes of skin reaction became very frequent and the patient was unable to use his bone-anchored hearing aid for 2 to 3 days a week. We opted for surgical treatment with Z-plasty for management of the skin complications.

Conclusion:

Use of the Z-plasty technique is recommended for the management of skin reactions associated with bone-anchored hearing aid implantation.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Holgers, KM, Tjellström, A, Bjursten, LM, Erlandsson, BE. Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin-penetrating titanium implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1988;9:56–9Google ScholarPubMed
2Hobson, JC, Roper, AJ, Andrew, R, Rothera, MP, Hill, P, Green, KM. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:132–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Husseman, J, Szudek, J, Monksfield, P, Power, D, O'Leary, S, Briggs, R. Simplified bone-anchored hearing aid insertion using a linear incision without soft tissue reduction. J Laryngol Otol 2013;127(suppl 2):S33–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Shirazi, MA, Marzo, SJ, Leonetti, JP. Perioperative complications with the bone-anchored hearing aid. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:236–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Tjellström, A, Granström, G. How we do it: frequency of skin necrosis after BAHA surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:216–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6House, JW, Kutz, JW. Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:213–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Wazen, JJ, Young, DL, Farrugia, MC, Chandrasekhar, SS, Ghossaini, SN, Borik, J et al. Successes and complications of the BAHA system. Otol Neurotol 2009;29:1115–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Gillett, D, Fairley, JW, Chandrashaker, TS, Bean, A, Gonzalez, J. Bone-anchored hearing aids: results of the first eight years of a programme in a district general hospital. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:537–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Granström, G, Tjellström, A. The bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in children with auricular malformations. Ear Nose Throat J 1997;76:238–40, 242, 244–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10de Wolf, MJ, Hol, MK, Huygen, PL, Mylanus, EA, Cremers, CW. Clinical outcome of the simplified surgical technique for BAHA implantation. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:1100–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Lloyd, S, Almeyda, J, Sirimanna, KS, Albert, DM, Bailey, CM. Updated surgical experience with bone-anchored hearing aids in children. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:826–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Tamarit Conejeros, JM, Dalmau Galofre, J, Murcia Puchades, V, Pons Rocher, F, Fernández Martínez, S, Estrems Navas, P. Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery [in Spanish]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2009;60:422–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Falcone, MT, Kaylie, DM, Labadie, RF, Haynes, DS. Bone anchored hearing aid abutment skin overgrowth reduction with clobetasol. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;139:829–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Frodel, JL. Creative uses of the Z-plasty technique. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;22:30–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Van Rompaey, V, Claes, G, Verstraeten, N, van Dinther, J, Zarowski, A, Offeciers, E et al. Skin reactions following BAHA surgery using the skin flap dermatome technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:373–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16de Wolf, MJ, Hol, MK, Huygen, PL, Mylanus, EA, Cremers, CW. Nijmegen results with application of a bone-anchored hearing aid in children: simplified surgical technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117:805–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Hultcrantz, M. Outcome of the bone-anchored hearing aid procedure without skin thinning: a prospective clinical trial. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:1134–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Pelosi, S, Chandrasekhar, SS. Soft tissue overgrowth in bone-anchored hearing aid patients: use of 8.5 mm abutment. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:576–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Larsson, A, Wigren, S, Andersson, M, Ekeroth, G, Flynn, M, Nannmark, U. Histologic evaluation of soft tissue integration of experimental abutments for bone anchored hearing implants using surgery without soft tissue reduction. Otol Neurotol 2012;33:1445–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed