Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:24:45.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TREATING RELIGION DIFFERENTLY - The Distinctiveness of Religion in American Law: Rethinking Religion Clause Jurisprudence. By Kathleen A. Brady. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Pp. 354. $39.99 (paper). ISBN: 978-1107016507.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2018

Thomas C. Berg
Thomas C. Berg*
Affiliation:
James L. Oberstar Professor of Law and Public Policy, University of St. Thomas School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

religion clausesfree exerciseestablishmentneutrality
Type
Book Review Roundtable
Information
Journal of Law and Religion , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , November 2017 , pp. 493 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © Center for the Study of Law and Religion at Emory University 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Lupu, Ira C. and Tuttle, Robert W., Secular Government, Religious People (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2014)Google Scholar.

3 Ibid., 196–201.

4 Full citations of all the cases referenced in these discussions are provided in a list at the close of the roundtable.

5 Ibid., 57–61, 204n88.

6 Monsma, Stephen V., Pluralism and Freedom: Faith-Based Organizations in a Democratic Society (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2012), 39Google Scholar. See also Berg, Thomas C., “Progressive Arguments for Religious Organizational Freedom: Reflections on the HHS Mandate,” Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, no. 21 (2013): 279–333Google Scholar, at 307–18.

7 My own principles and categories are described in Thomas C. Berg, “The New Attacks on Religious Freedom Legislation, and Why They Are Wrong,” in “Symposium: State and Federal Religious Liberty Legislation: Is It Necessary? Is It Constitutional? Is It Good Policy?,” special issue, Cardozo Law Review 21, no. 2–3 (1999): 415–54Google Scholar.