Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:52:40.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Abortion Opponents Challenge DOJ and ACGME Efforts to Ensure Abortion Services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Jennifer Martinez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Recent Developments in Health Law
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 205 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

18 U.S.C. § 248; and Puger, Ana, “Groups Decry Attacks on Abortion Providers, Urge U.S. to Step Up Prosecutions,” Boston Globe, Jan. 20, 1995, at A12.Google Scholar
Price, Joyce, “Pro-Lifers Protest Use of '94 Access Law; Justice Accused of Restricting Freedom,” Washington Times, Jan. 13, 1995, at A8.Google Scholar
“Medical Council Clarifies Abortion Standards,” Washington Post, Feb. 18, 1995, at A2.Google Scholar
Beck, Joan, “Outrage Aborts an Outrageous Moral and Medical Edict,” Chicago Tribune, Feb. 19, 1995, at C3; and McNamee, Tom, “Training Hospitals Must Teach Abortion; Ruling Called ‘Moral Outrage’,” Chicago Sun-Times, Feb. 15, 1995, at 1.Google Scholar
St. Agnes Hospital v. Riddick, 748 F. Supp. 319 (D. Md. 1990) (holding that removal of accreditation because of inadequate family planning training did not violate Catholic hospital's free exercise of religion).Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Elisabeth, “Finances and Fear Spurring Hospitals to Drop Abortion,” New York Times, Feb. 20, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar
“Abortion Groups Call for Better Security,” States News Service, Jan. 19, 1995.Google Scholar
See Puger, , supra note 1.Google Scholar
American Life League, Inc. v. Reno, 47 F.3d 642, (4th Cir. 1995), aff'g 855 F. Supp. 137 (E.D. Va. 1994); Woodall v. Reno, 47 F.3d 656 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Brock, 863 F. Supp. 851 (E.D. Wis. 1994); Riley v. Reno, 860 F. Supp. 693 (D. Ariz. 1994); Cook v. Reno, 859 F. Supp. 1008 (W.D. La. 1994); Cheffer v. Reno, No. 94-0611-CIV-ORL-18, 1994 WL 644873 (M.D. Fla. July 26, 1994); and Council for Life Coalition v. Reno, 855 F. Supp. 1422 (S.D. Cal. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Wilson, _ F. Supp. _, No. 94-CR-140,1995 WL 114802 (D. Wis. Mar. 16, 1995).Google Scholar
American Life League, Inc. v. Reno, 47 F.3d 642 (4th Cir. 1995), aff'g 855 F. Supp. 137 (E.D. Va. 1994).Google Scholar
Laura Goodstein and Pierre Thomas, “Clinic Killings Followed Years of Anti-Abortion Violence,” Washington Post, Jan. 17, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
“Abortion Rights Groups Report Rise in Threats Against Doctors,” Los Angeles Times, Dec. 21, 1994, at A32.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Lemonick, Michael, “An Armed Fanatic Raises the Stakes,” Time Magazine, Jan. 9, 1995, at 34.Google Scholar
See Goodstein, and Thomas, , supra note 12.Google Scholar
“Abortion Activists See Continued Threat,” Reuters, Jan. 19, 1995.Google Scholar
The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, “In the States,” Reproductive Freedom News, Jan. 27, 1995, at 4, 6, 7.Google Scholar
“OB/GYN Residents: Abortion Training Will be Mandatory,” Health Line, Feb. 15, 1995.Google Scholar
Barron, James, “More Prospective Obstetricians Will Be Taught Abortion Skills,” New York Times, Feb. 15, 1995, at A1; and “OB/GYN Residents,” supra note 20.Google Scholar
See Beck, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
“Medical Backbone; New Rule on Abortion Training is Praiseworthy,” Houston Chronicle, Feb. 23, 1995, at A30.Google Scholar
See Rosenthal, , supra note 6.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Creamer, Anita, “When Doctors Can't Learn to Be Doctors,” Sacramento Bee, Feb. 21, 1995, at D1.Google Scholar
Skordas, Jennifer, “New Rule on Abortion? U. to Stand Pat, No Curriculum Change Planned in Medical School Despite Council's Edict,” Salt Lake Tribune, Mar. 4, 1995, at B2.Google Scholar
Stewart, Anne, Letter to the Editor, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Feb. 23, 1995, at 6B; and McNamee, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
“Creighton Stands Worthy of Respect,” Omaha World-Herald, Feb. 25, 1995, at 12; and McNamee, , supra note 4.Google Scholar
St. Agnes Hospital v. Riddick, 748 F. Supp. 319 (D. Md. 1990).Google Scholar
Id. at 326; and see also McKeesport Hospital v. ACGME, 24 F.3d 519 (3rd Cir. 1994) (holding that withdrawal of accreditation by ACGME did not constitute state action).Google Scholar
Id. at 329.Google Scholar
Id. at 343.Google Scholar
The newest weapon in antiabortion activists’ arsenal is the malpractice suit. Antiabortion activists are encouraging women to sue doctors who performed abortions on them for malpractice and emotional distress. While no one knows exactly how many of these cases are currently pending, a 1994 seminar on abortion malpractice sponsored by Life Dynamics, Inc. drew 125 people. Even if the suits are not successful, doctors say the nuisance value and rise in their insurance premiums that result can have a significant impact. See Lewin, Tamar, “Latest Tactic Against Abortion: Accusing Doctors of Malpractice,” New York Times, Apr. 9, 1995, at A1.Google Scholar