Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:49:19.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Currents in Contemporary Ethics

HPV Vaccines, Privacy, and Public Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Heather Harrell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine burst onto the market and the legislative scene nearly simultaneously. Marketed as an amazing medical breakthrough, the vaccine GARDASIL prevents infection with four strains of Human Papillomavirus in nave populations; these four strains are responsible for 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts. Although most agreed that the vaccine was a wonderful medical advancement with the potential to save women's lives, there was strong disagreement about and a vocal public response to legislative attempts to require girls to receive HPV vaccines for school attendance.

The strong public response to HPV vaccine mandates partially stemmed from the sense that this vaccine is different from previously mandated vaccines because it attempts to prevent disease whose sole route of transmission is through sexual contact. Most other diseases covered by mandated vaccines are spread through the air, with little an individual can do in altering their behavior to prevent infection.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Spring 2009 , pp. 134 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Food and Drug Administration, “Product Approval Information — Licensing Action, GARDASIL Questions and Answers,” available at <http://www.fda.gov/CBER/products/hpvmer060806qa.htm> (last visited January 7, 2009) (stating approval of Gardasil in document dated June of 2006); see, e.g., Schwartz, J., Ethics of Vaccine Project, University of Pennsylvania, “Texas HPV Vaccine Mandates in the News,” available at <http://www.vaccineethics.org/2007/02/texas-hpv-vaccine-mandate-in-news.html> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+7,+2009)+(stating+approval+of+Gardasil+in+document+dated+June+of+2006);+see,+e.g.,+Schwartz,+J.,+Ethics+of+Vaccine+Project,+University+of+Pennsylvania,+“Texas+HPV+Vaccine+Mandates+in+the+News,”+available+at++(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
Wikipedia, , s.v. “Gardasil,” available at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gardasil> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
See, e.g., Vos, S., “HPV Vaccine Debate Returning: Full House to Look at Bill This Week,” Lexington Herald-Leader, February 20, 2007 (saying “[b]oth sides praise the vaccine, the first ever to prevent cancer. The disagreement lies in whether to make it a school requirement.”)Google Scholar
For examples of states creating vaccine legislation, see Gerber, R., “Mandatory Cervical Cancer Vaccinations,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 35, no. 3 (2004): 495–497, at 495.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, “Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Infection,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/STD/HPV/> (last visited January 8, 2009) (stating that “[g]enital HPV infection is a sexually transmitted disease.”)+(last+visited+January+8,+2009)+(stating+that+“[g]enital+HPV+infection+is+a+sexually+transmitted+disease.”)>Google Scholar
Lederberg, J., ed., Encyclopedia of Microbiology, Q-Z, 2nd ed., 4th vol. (San Diego: Academic Press, 2000): At 769–77; Webster, R. G. Granoff, A., eds., Encyclopedia of Virology, 2nd vol. (London: Academic Press, 1994): At 844, 881; Minor, P. D., “Poliovirus General Features” and Wolinsky, J. S., “Rubella Virus,” in Webster, R. G. Granoff, A., eds., Encyclopedia of Virology, 3rd vol. (London: Academic Press, 1994): At 1117, 1296.Google Scholar
For example, smoking is associated with heart disease and multiple cancers. Cleveland Clinic, “Smoking and Your Health,” available at <http://www.clevelandclinic.org/heartcenter/pub/guide/prevention/smoking/smoking_hrtds.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009). See also National Cancer Institute, “Smoking and Cancer: Questions and Answers,” available at <http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Tobacco/cancer> (last visited January 8, 2009). Overweight and obesity has been linked to cardiovascular disease, arthritis, cancer, and diabetes. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department for Health and Human Services, “Overweight and Obesity,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/consequences.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).+See+also+National+Cancer+Institute,+“Smoking+and+Cancer:+Questions+and+Answers,”+available+at++(last+visited+January+8,+2009).+Overweight+and+obesity+has+been+linked+to+cardiovascular+disease,+arthritis,+cancer,+and+diabetes.+Centers+for+Disease+Control+and+Prevention,+Department+for+Health+and+Human+Services,+“Overweight+and+Obesity,”+available+at++(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, “Achievements in Public Health, 1900–1999: Safer and Healthier Foods,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48, no. 40 (1999): 905–913, available at <http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4840a1.htm> (last visited January 20, 2009) (indicating that much food and water-borne illness has been curtailed through public health initiatives and other conditions like obesity are the currently bigger challenges to public health in the United States); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, “Achievements in Public Health, 1900–1999: Control of Infectious Diseases,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 48, no. 29 (1999): 621–629, available at <http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4829a1.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009) (indicating that traditional infectious diseases have been controlled through sanitation and hygiene methods, antibiotics, and vaccination, but noting that emergence of new disease and bioterrorism, as well as the link between infectious agents and chronic behavioral-related illness require continued vigilance and study); and National Center for Health Statistics, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Healthy People 2010, Leading Health Indicators at a Glance, available at <http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/otheract/hpdata2010/2010indicators.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009) (showing that five of the top ten indicators relate to behaviors). See also Foege, W. E., “Redefining Public Health,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32, no. 4, Supplement (2004): 23–26, at 24 (noting changes to public health that has occurred since author entered the field). See also Gostin, L. O. Burris, S. Lazzarini, Z., “The Law and the Public's Health: A Study of Infectious Disease Law in the United States,” Columbia Law Review 99, no. 1 (1999) 59–128, at 79–80 (discussing increased rates of chronic disease and a resulting increased public health focus on behaviors that contribute to those diseases).Google Scholar
See infra section “Considerations for Public Health Regulations and HPV” in this article.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, “Genital HPV Infection – CDC Fact Sheet,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/std/HPV/STD-Fact-HPV.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
National Cancer Institute, U.S. National Institutes of Health, “Cervical Cancer Prevention,” available at <http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/prevention/cervical/Patient/page2> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
Gostin, L. O., “The Future of Public Health Law,” American Journal of Law and Medicine 12, nos. 3–4 (1986): 461–490, at 465 (suggesting that if the compulsory measure lasts indefinitely because of continued communicability, then the regulation is less likely to be justified).Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, “HPV Vaccines: Questions and Answers,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/hpv/vac-faqs.htm> (last visited Nov. 30, 2008).+(last+visited+Nov.+30,+2008).>Google Scholar
This paper is not meant to contain an analysis of all previously suggested factors for consideration, but rather to consider previously delineated factors that are particularly relevant in the case of HPV and behavior regulation.Google Scholar
See Spivey, E. Y., “Trans Fat: Can New York City Save Its Citizens from this ‘Metabolic Poison’?” Georgia Law Review 42 (Fall 2007): 273–307, at 275.Google Scholar
See Gostin, , supra note 13, at 465 (discussing how “certain scientific realities” need to be considered).Google Scholar
Id. (stating that “the seriousness and prevalence of the disease influences the decision whether or not to adopt a restrictive public health response.”)Google Scholar
Wikipedia, , s.v. “Human Papillomavirus,” <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_papillomavirus> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
See, e.g., Va. Code Ann. § 32.1–46 (A) (12) and (B) (3) (2007). Virginia was the only state to pass a mandate though many other states considered them. See Gerber, , supra note 4, at 495. The vaccine is only approved for use in females in the United States; however, the fact that only women would be mandated to be protected from HPV while males would not is important regardless of FDA approval.Google Scholar
See supra note 19, stating that “[t]he Pap test is an effective strategy for reducing the risk of invasive cervical cancer” and that those who have been vaccinated against HPV should continue to have regular Pap smears.Google Scholar
It is unknown how long the vaccine remains effective. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Health and Human Services, “HPV Vaccine Questions and Answers,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/std/HPV/STDFact-HPV-vaccine.htm#hpvvac4> (last visited January 8, 2009). It is also unknown what the long-term effects of immunity against these four virus strains will be on the prevalence and disease-causing power of other oncogenic strains. Baden, L. R., “Human Papillomavirus Vaccine — Opportunity and Challenge,” New England Journal of Medicine 356, no. 19 (2007): 1990–1991, at 1990. See also Sawaya, G. F. Smith-McCune, K., “HPV Vaccination — More Answers, More Questions,” New England Journal of Medicine 356, no. 19 (2007): 1991–1993, at 1992 (stating that the FUTURE II trial shows increasing rates of high grade cervical lesions in the vaccinated population, supporting the idea that other types of HPV have filled the void left by HPV 16 and 18). Others argue that such an idea is not a likely outcome since women are often infected with multiple types of HPV. The FUTURE II Study Group, “Quadrivalent Vaccine against Human Papillomavirus to Prevent High-Grade Cervical Lesions,” New England Journal of Medicine 356, no. 19 (2007): 1915–1927, at 1919.Google Scholar
There are only approximately 10,000–11, 000 new cases per year in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, “HPV-Associated Cancers,” available at <http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/statistics/cases.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
There are between 250,000 and 1 million women diagnosed with precancerous lesions each year. Wikipedia, s.v. “Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia,” available at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cervical_intraepithelial_neoplasia> (last visited January 8, 2009).+(last+visited+January+8,+2009).>Google Scholar
See supra note 23.Google Scholar
See supra note 19.Google Scholar
Krent, H. J., “Whose Business Is Your Pancreas? Potential Privacy Problems in New York City's Mandatory Diabetes Registry,” Annals Health Law 17 (Winter 2008): 1–37.Google Scholar
See Gostin, , supra note 13, at 470 and id., Krent.Google Scholar
See e.g., Picou v. Gillum, 874 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1989) (finding no constitutional violations in law requiring helmet use when riding a motorcycle) and People v. Kohrig, 498 N.E.2d 1158 (Ill. 1986) (finding that law requiring the use of seat belts did not violate the due process clause of the Constitution).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Levine, S., “Parents Question HPV Vaccine: Push to Mandate Shots Rapidly Creates Backlash,” Washington Post, March 4, 2007, available at <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/03/AR2007030301356.html> (last visited January 8, 2009).Google Scholar
See, e.g., National Conference of State Legislatures, “HPV Vaccine,” <http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/HPV-vaccine.htm> (last visited January 8, 2009) (stating that “others may have moral objections related to a vaccine mandate for a sexually transmitted disease.”)+(last+visited+January+8,+2009)+(stating+that+“others+may+have+moral+objections+related+to+a+vaccine+mandate+for+a+sexually+transmitted+disease.”)>Google Scholar
There are numerous regulations regarding food safety that affect the consumption of adults. The recent bans on trans fats can be viewed as a food safety regulation since the bans apply to foods consumed in restaurants only, where consumers would be unaware of the presence of trans fats, and it is often argued that trans fats are not good for one's health.Google Scholar
National Association of State Boards of Education, “Healthy Schools, State Level School Health Policies, State-by-State School Food Services/School Food Environment,” available at <http://www.nasbe.org/Healthy-Schools/States/Topics.asp?Category=C&Topic=2#Kentucky> (last visited December 20, 2007) (listing regulations about restrictions on food and soda sales in schools).+(last+visited+December+20,+2007)+(listing+regulations+about+restrictions+on+food+and+soda+sales+in+schools).>Google Scholar
See In re Kovaleski, 2006 WL 199549, at 3 (Ohio App. 2006) (finding obesity of child one reason to deny custody to parent); In re R.C., 122 P.3d 420 (Kan.App. 2005) (finding obesity of child one reason to terminate parental rights); In re Adrian, D., 861 A.2d 1286 (Me. 2004) (finding lack of recommended follow-up for child's obesity as one reason for child protective order); In re Brittany, T., 835 N.Y.S.2d 829 (Family Court New York 2007) (listing other courts that have taken action because child was morbidly obese; this court likewise took action).Google Scholar
See Ravin v. State, 537 P.2d 494, 502 (Alaska 1975) (stating that “‘Big Brother’ cannot, in the name of public health, dictate to anyone what he can eat or drink or smoke in the privacy of his own home.”).Google Scholar