Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:38:20.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health Information Exchange in Memphis: Impact on the Physician-Patient Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Mark E. Frisse
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Patients and their physicians frequently make important health care decisions with incomplete information. Memory fails; records are incomplete; the onset of significant events is confused with other life stories; and even the most basic information about medications, laboratory tests, allergies, and problems is often the result of guesswork. As providers and as patients, we suffer because information vital to health care is not available when and where it is needed. Data required for care are dispersed across various settings and represented in a range of formats; incentives to bring these data together do not exist.

In recent years, four specific approaches have emerged to address patient-centered information access. The first model attempts to consolidate all care into a single care delivery and financing system. This model — prevalent in many European countries — is to some degree extant at Kaiser-Permanente and other integrated care and financing systems. This model is ideal if and when one organization is responsible for all care delivery and financing. Such models present “one-stop shopping” for managing health information, coordinating care, communicating with providers and support groups, and ensuring both payment and accountability.

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 50 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Penfield, S. L., Anderson, K. M., Edmund, M., and Belanger, M., Toward Health Information Liquidity: Realization of Better, More Efficient Care from the Free Flow of Health Information, Booz Allen White paper, January 2009, available at <http://www.boozallen.com/publications/article/40808278> (last visited December 15, 2009).Google Scholar
Chen, C., Garrido, T., Chock, D., Okawa, G., and Liang, L., “The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: Transforming and Streamlining Modalities of Care,” Health Affairs 28, no. 2 (2009): 323–33.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. S., McClellan, M. B., Bertko, J., Lieberman, S. M., Lee, J. J., Lewis, J. L., and Skinner, J. S., “Fostering Accountable Health Care: Moving Forward in Medicare,” Health Affairs 28, no. 2 (2009): W219-w31.Google Scholar
Mostashari, F., Tripathi, M., and Kendall, M., “A Tale of Two Large Community Electronic Health Record Extension Projects,” Health Affairs 28, no. 2 (2009): 345–356; Mandl, K. D., and Kohane, I. S., “No Small Change for the Health Information Economy,” New England Journal of Medicine 360, no. 13 (2009): 1278–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id. (Mandl, and Kohane, ).Google Scholar
See Penfield, et al., supra note 1.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. B., “Protecting Patient Privacy through Health Record Trusts,” Health Affairs 28, no. 2 (2009): 444–446; Kahn, J. S., Aulakh, V., and Bosworth, A., “What It Takes: Characteristics of the Ideal Personal Health Record,” Health Affairs 28, no. 2 (2009): 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Milstein, J., Bates, D. W., and Jha, A. K., “U.S. Regional Health Information Organizations: Progress and Challenges,” Health Affairs (Millwood) 28, no. 2 (2009): 483–492; Adler-Milstein, J., McAfee, A. P., Bates, D. W., and Jha, A. K., “The State of Regional Health Information Organizations: Current Activities and Financing,” Health Affairs (Millwood) 27, no. 1 (2008): w60–w69.Google Scholar
Frisse, M. E. and Holmes, R. L., “Estimated Financial Savings Associated with Health Information Exchange and Ambulatory Care Referral,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 40, no. 6, Supplement (2007): S27–S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisse, M. E., “Comments on Return on Investment (Roi) as It Applies to Clinical Systems,” Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 13, no. 3 (2006): 365–367.Google Scholar
Starr, P., “Smart Technology, Stunted Policy: Developing Health Information Networks,” Health Affairs (Millwood) 16, no. 3 (1997): 91–105.Google Scholar
Ostroff, F., “Change Management in Government,” Harvard Business Review 84, no. 5 (2006): 141–158; Tabrizi, B. N., Rapid Transformation: A 90-Day Plan for Fast and Effective Change (Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2007); Kotter, J. P., “Why Transformation Efforts Fail,” Harvard Business Review (March-April 1995): 59–67.Google Scholar
Id. (Kotter).Google Scholar
McKinsey & Company, Achieving a Critical Mission in Difficult Times – Tenncare's Financial Viability, December 11, 2003, and Achieving a Critical Mission in Difficult Times – Illustrative Strategic Options for TennCare, February 11, 2004.Google Scholar
Davis, J., “Condition Critical: The Med Is on Life Support. Can It Survive?” Memphis Flyer, 2003, available at <http://www.memphisflyer.com/memphis/condition-critical/Content?oid=1111538> (last visited December 15, 2009).Google Scholar
Bredesen, P., Saving TennCare: An Address to the Tennessee Legislature, 2004, available at <http://www.sitemason.com/files/fusbvO/021704%20TennCare%20Speech%20RELEASE.pdf> (last visited November 25, 2009).Google Scholar
Goetz, D., State and Regional Demonstrations in Health Information Technology: Technical Discussion (AHRQ Rfp-04–0015), June 15, 2004.Google Scholar
Powers, M., “Panel Ponders Med's Future,” Memphis Commercial Appeal, May 30, 2007.Google Scholar
See Bredesen, , supra note 16; Bredesen, P., Medicaid 2.0: National Democratic Address, June 11, 2005; Bredesen, P., State of Tennessee, “Address to the Annual HIMSS Meeting,” <http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/governor/viewArticle-Content.do?id=981> (last visited November 25, 2009).+(last+visited+November+25,+2009).>Google Scholar
California Health Care Foundation, Overuse of Emergency Departments among Insured Californians October, 2006; Finnell, J. T., Overhage, J. M., and McDonald, C. J., “In Support of Emergency Department Health Information Technology,” AMIA Annual Symposia Proceedings (2005): 246–250; Overhage, J. M., Dexter, P. R., Perkins, S. M., Cordell, W. H., McGoff, J., McGrath, R., and McDonald, C. J., “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Clinical Information Shared from Another Institution,” Annals of Emergency Medicine 39, no. 1 (2002): 14–23; Nolan, L., Havey, J., Jones, K., and Regenstein, M., Urgent Matters: Assessment of the Safety Net in Memphis Tennessee, March 2004.Google Scholar
Markle Foundation, “The Connecting for Health Common Framework,” available at <http://www.connectingforhealth.org/> (last visited November 25, 2009).+(last+visited+November+25,+2009).>Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M., Grossman, J. H., and Hwang, J., The Innovator's Prescription: A Disruptive Solution for Health Care (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009).Google Scholar
Rundle, R., “Doctors Say Electronic Data-Sharing Is Saving Lives, Money,” Kaiser Health News, June 22, 2009.Google Scholar