Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:39:57.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health-Care Rationing: Critical Features, Ordinary Language, and Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Barbara J. Russell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this article is to re-visit how rationing is defined for a health-care context, Two reasons justify returning to this topic. First, the variability as to how rationing has been defined in the legal, medical, and philosophical literature justifies a careful examination to identify its critical features. Second, I believe that if the definitions typically employed in the literature, several of which are discussed below, are compared to those that would be offered by the American public, ethically weighty dissimilarities would be apparent. Disparate characterizations are worrisome because serious “disconnections” between policymakers’ understandings, rhetoric, and priorities and those of the general public are more likely.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , Spring 2002 , pp. 82 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Daniels, N., “The Articulation of Values and Principles in Health Care Reform”. Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 19, no. 5 (1994): 425–33.Google Scholar
Ubel, P.A. and Goold, S.D., “‘Rationing’ Health Care: Not All Definitions Are Created Equal,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 158, no. 3 (1998): 209-14, at 210 (italics removed).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhey, R.S., “Provider Response to Healthcare Reform,” Western State Law Review, 21 (1993): 108–48; Jost, T.S., “Health Care Rationing in the Courts: A Comparative Study,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 21 (1998): 639-714; Kalb, P.E., “Defining an ‘Adequate’ Package of Health Care Benefits,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140 (1992): 1987-98.Google Scholar
Ginzberg, E., “The Uncertain Future of Managed Care,” N. Engl. J. Med., 340 (1999): 144–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boren, S.D. and Boren, D.M., Letter to the Editor, N. Engl. J. Med., 341 (1999): 213.Google Scholar
Relman, A.S., “Is Rationing Inevitable?,” N. Engl. J. Med., 322 (1990): 1809–10; Hadorn, D.C. and Brook, R.H., “The Health Care Resource Allocation Debate: Defining Our Terms,” JAMA, 266 (1991): 3328-31; Etzioni, A., “Health Care Rationing: A Critical Evaluation,” Health Affairs (Millwood), 10, no. 2 (1991): 88-95; Brook, R.H. and Lohr, K.N., “Will We Need to Ration Effective Health Care?,” Issues in Science & Technology, 3, no. 1 (1986): 68-77; Angell, M., “Cost Containment and the Physician,” JAMA, 254 (1985): 1203-07; Blustein, J. and Marmor, T.R., “Cutting Waste by Making Rules: Promises, Pitfalls, and Realistic Prospects,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140 (1992): 1543-72.Google Scholar
Asch, D.A. and Ubel, P.A., “Rationing by Any Other Name,” N. Engl. J. Med., 336 (1997): 1668–71; Ubel, P.A. and Goold, S.D., “Recognizing Bedside Rationing: Clear Cases and Tough Calls,” Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, no. 1 (1997): 74-80; Reagan, M.D., “Health Care Rationing: What Does It Mean?,” N. Engl. J. Med., 319 (1988): 1149-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Asch, and Ubel, , supra note 7; Ubel, and Goold, , supra note 7.Google Scholar
Grumet, G.W., “Health Care Rationing through Inconvenience: The Third Party's Secret Weapon,” N. Engl. J. Med., 321 (1989): 607–11.Google Scholar
Daniels, N., “Why Saying No to Patients in the United States Is so Difficult: Cost Containment, Justice, and Provider Autonomy,” N. Engl. J. Med., 314 (1986): 1380–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mechanic, D., Future Issues in Health Care: Social Policy and the Rationing of Medical Services (New York: The Free Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Evans, R.W., “Health Care Technology and the Inevitability of Resource Allocation and Rationing Decisions: Part I,” JAMA, 249 (1983): 2047–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Ubel, and Goold, , supra note 7.Google Scholar
See Mechanic, , supra note 11, at 11.Google Scholar
Aaron, H.J. and Schwartz, W.B., The Painful Prescription: Rationing Hospital Care (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1984): at 8.Google Scholar
See Reagan, , supra note 7, at 1151.Google Scholar
See Hadorn, and Brook, , supra note 6, at 3331.Google Scholar
See Asch, and Ubel, , supra note 7, at 1668.Google Scholar
See Ubel, and Goold, , supra note 2, at 209–14.Google Scholar
Hall, M.A., “Rationing Health Care at the Bedside,” New York Law Review, 69 (1994): 693–780.Google Scholar
Admittedly, efficiency can have ethical implications when it is chosen over, say, fairness or compassion. But efficiency does not necessarily involve ethical worries.Google Scholar
Hall, , supra note 20; Perry, C., “When Medical Need Exceeds Medical Resource and when Medical Want Exceeds Medical Need,” Western State University Law Review, 21 (1993): 39–63.Google Scholar
New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, CD-ROM (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Ubel, P.A., Pricing Life: Why It's Time for Health Care Rationing (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Id. at 67.Google Scholar
Fleck, L.M., “Just Health Care Rationing: A Democratic Decisionmaking Approach,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140 (1992): 1597–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B., Moral Luck (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990): at 1–19.Google Scholar
Tumulty, K., “Let's Play Doctor,” Time, July 13, 1998, at 28–32.Google Scholar
Fleck, , supra note 26.Google Scholar
Zaner, R.M., “The Phenomenon of Trust and the Patient-Physician Relationship,” in Pellegrino, E.D., Veatch, R.M. and Langan, J.P., eds., Ethics, Trust, and the Professions: Philosophical and Cultural Aspects (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1991), 45–67; McCullough, L.B., “John Gregory (1724–1773) and the Invention of Professional Relationships in Medicine,” Journal of Clinical Ethics, 8, no. 1 (1997): 11-21.Google Scholar
May, W.F., Testing the Medical Covenant: Active Euthanasia and Health Care Reform (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996); Trotter, C.G., “The Medical Covenant: A Roycean Perspective,” in McGee, G., ed., Pragmatic Bioethics (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1999): 84-96.Google Scholar
Ubel, , supra note 24.Google Scholar
Ubel, P.A., “Physicians' Duties in an Era of Cost Containment: Advocacy or Betrayal?,” JAMA, 282 (1999): 1675; Ubel, P.A. et al., “Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in a Setting of Budget Constraints: Is It Equitable?,” N. Engl. J. Med., 334 (1996): 1174- 77; Menzel, P. et al., “Toward a Broader View of Values in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health,” Hastings Center Report, 29, no. 3 (1999): 7-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, G. and Bobbitt, P., Tragic Choices (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1978): at 17.Google Scholar
Fleck, , see supra note 26.Google Scholar