Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T09:44:28.024Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learning from the Flint Water Crisis: Restoring and Improving Public Health Practice, Accountability, and Trust

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Abstract

The Flint water crisis demonstrates the importance of adequate legal preparedness in dealing with complicated legal arrangements and multiple statutory responsibilities. It also demonstrates the need for alternative accountability measures when public officials fail to protect the public's health and explores mechanisms for restoring community trust in governmental public health.

Type
Symposium Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Flint Water Advisory Task Force — Final Report, Commissioned by the Office of Governor Rick Snyder, State of Michigan 15-16 (March 21, 2016), available at <https://www.michigan.gov/documents/snyder/FWATF_FINAL_REPORT_21March2016_517805_7.pdf> (last visited March 20, 2019).+(last+visited+March+20,+2019).>Google Scholar
The Flint Water Crisis: Systemic Racism through the Lens of Flint — Report of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission 109 (February 17, 2017), available at <http://www.michigan.gov/documents/mdcr/VFlintCrisisRep-F-Edited3-13-17_554317_7.pdf> (last visited March 20, 2019).+(last+visited+March+20,+2019).>Google Scholar
Jacobson et al., supra note 2, at 48, 60.Google Scholar
Benjamin, G. C. and Moulton, A. D., “Public Health Legal Preparedness: A Framework for Action,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36, no. S1 (2008): 13-17, at 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson et al., supra note 2, at 47-48, 60.Google Scholar
See Flint Water Advisory Task Force — Final Report, supra note 1, at 25, 31-33, 36-37, 47-51.Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. D., Wasserman, J., Botoseneanu, A., Silverstein, A., and Wu, H. W., “The Role of Law in Public Health Preparedness: Opportunities and Challenges,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law 37, no. 2 (2012): 297-328, at 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (US) Committee on Risk Perception and Communication, Improving Risk Communication (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1989): at 108-142.Google Scholar
Jacobson et al., supra note 2, at 33.Google Scholar
Guertin et al. v. State of Michigan et al., No. 5:16-cv-12412 (6th Cir., Jan. 4, 2019).Google Scholar
Gable, L., and Buehler, J. W., “Criticized, Fired, Sued, or Prosecuted: Hindsight and Public Health Accountability,” Public Health Reports 132, no. 6 (2017): 676-678.Google Scholar
Umbrett, M. S., Vos, B., Coates, R. B., and Lightfoot, E., “Restorative Justice in the Twenty-First Century: A Social Movement Full of Opportunities and Pitfalls,” Marquette Law Review 89 (2005): 251-304, at 258; T. R. Clear and D. R. Karp, The Community Justice Ideal: Preventing Crime and Achieving Justice (New York: Routledge, 1999): at 24-32.Google Scholar
Platt, J. E., Jacobson, P. D., and Kardia, S. L. R., “Public Trust in Health Information Sharing: A Measure of System Trust,” Health Services Research 53, no. 2 (2018): 824-845, at 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar