Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:56:07.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Physicians Choose to Participate in the Death of Their Patients: Ethics and Physician-Assisted Suicide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

David C. Thomasma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Physicians have long aided their patients in dying in an effort to ease human suffering. It is only in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries that the prolongation of life has taken on new meaning due to the powers now available to physicians, through new drugs and high technology interventions. Whereas earlier physicians and patients could readily acknowledge that nothing further could be done, today that judgment is problematic.

Most often, aiding the dying took the form of not doing anything further to prolong life. Morally, this act of restraint was not difficult, because few options could have been considered. However, some physicians, rarely, would help patients die either by hastening death directly or by increasing pain control with the risk of hastening death, the so-called double effect. When directly hastening death, physicians either directly caused the death of the patient through euthansia, or supplied the means to the patient to bring about death with or without encouragement to use these means. The latter is physician-assisted suicide (PAS).

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , Fall 1996 , pp. 183 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

It has become so problematic that some patients tell me they have approached their doctors about aid-in-dying in a non-threatening way, say, by talking with them about reading Kübler-Ross. The doctors respond: “Oh boy, we don't discuss that around here!” Clinically speaking, there is an enormous gap between proposed public policy legalizing PAS and doctors' willingness to back it with action.Google Scholar
There is almost complete unanimity among bioethicists about the morality of the double effect. For example, see Bresnahan, J., “The Catholic Art of Dying,” America, Nov. 4, 1995, 12–16.Google Scholar
This is the way Freud died, for example. When his cancer became too painful, he asked his friend to help him die. His friend administered an overdose of morphine. The next morning, Freud was still alive, so his friend gave him a fatal second dose.Google Scholar
In a comment on my suggestion, Dr. George Crile, a fellow of the American College of Surgeons, suggested, for the purpose of empowerment not for death itself, that the phrase by the physician be something like: “If you take [this high dose] you will most certainly die.” In this way, the physician does not encourage taking the medication (thus reinforcing the effort toward empowerment within the context of addressing the patient's suffering), yet acknowledges what the patient already knows: He/she has the power to take life. See the later discussion of Dr. Timothy Quill's original intention in his article on assisted suicide. See Quill, T., “Death and Dignity: A Case of Individualized Decision Making,” N. Engl. J. Med., 324 (1991): 691–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P., Rethinking Life & Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995). See also Campbell, C., “The Crumbling Foundations of Medical Ethics,” Theoretical Medicine, (1997): Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Royko, M., “Widow Finds High Cost of Dying Lives on Long After Death,” Chicago Tribune, Aug. 14, 1996, at 1:3; Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel has argued that there is a constant conjunction between interest in euthanasia and PAS and economic fears. See Emanuel, E., “Cost Savings at the End of Life. What do the Data Show?,” JAMA, 275 (1996): 1907-14.Google Scholar
This use includes emotional responses to difficult cases, what Yale Kamisar calls the “compelling force of heartrending individual cases.” See Kamisar, Y., “The Reasons so Many People Support Physician-Assisted Suicide—And Why These Reasons Are Not Convincing,” Issues in Law & Medicine, 12 (1996): 113–32.Google Scholar
Quill, T.E. Cassel, C.K. Meier, D.E., “Care of the Hopelessly Ill: Proposed Clinical Criteria for Physician-Assisted Suicide,” N. Engl. J. Med., 327 (1992): 1330-84; Miller, F.G.et al., “Regulating Physician-Assisted Death,” N. Engl. J. Med., 331 (1994): 119–23; and Baron, C.H.et al., “A Model Statute to Authorize and Regulate Physician-Assisted Suicide,” Harvard Journal on Legislation, 33 (1996): 1–34.Google Scholar
Quill, Cassel, Meier, , id.: And Ciesielski-Carlucci, C., “Physician Attitudes and Experience with Assisted Suicide: Results of a Small Opinion Survey,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2, no. 1 (1993): 39–44.Google Scholar
Associated Press/Media General, Poll no. 4 (Richmond: Media General, Feb. 1985).Google Scholar
Wanzer, S.H.et al., “The Physician's Responsibility Toward Hopelessly Ill Patients: A Second Look,” N. Engl. J. Med., 320 (1989): 844–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushner, T., “Derek Humphry on Death with Dignity,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2, no. 1 (1993): 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGough, P.M., “Washington State Initiative 119: The First Public Vote on Legalizing Physician-Assisted Death,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2, no. 1 (1993): 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphry, D., Final Exit: The Practicalities of Self-Deliverance and Assisted Suicide for the Dying (New York: Dell Paperbacks, rev. ed., 1992).Google Scholar
American Medical Association, Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations (Chicago: American Medical Association, 1996).Google Scholar
Associated Press, “AMA Debates Policy Opposing Assisted Suicide,” Chicago Sun-Times, June 24, 1996, at 5.Google Scholar
American Nurses Association, Center for Ethics and Human Rights, Task Force on the Nurses Role in End-of-Life Decisions, Compendium of Position Statements on the Nurse's Role in End-of-Life Decisions (Washington, D.C.: American Nurses Association, 1992).Google Scholar
Asch, D., “The Role of Critical Care Nurses in Euthanasia,” N. Engl. J. Med., 334 (1996): 1374-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, C., “Euthanasia and Nursing Practice—Right Question, Wrong Answer,” N. Engl. J. Med., 334 (1996): 1401-02; and Coffey, R.R., “Nurse Says Their Goal is to End Pain—Not Lives,” Chicago Sun-Times, June 13, 1996, at 6. A wide range of professional opinion and support for PAS can be found in Battin, M.P. Lipman, A.G., eds., Drug Use in Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia (Binghamton: Pharmaceutical Products Press, 1996). Despite its title, only a few articles are devoted to drug use; the rest explore PAS from different professional perspectives.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinfels, P., “Help for the Helping Hands in Death,” New York Times, Feb. 14, 1993, at 1, 6.Google Scholar
See the debate over assisting the mentally ill to die occasioned by the Chabot case in the Netherlands. See infra note 28 and accompanying text. See also the issue of Cambridge Quarterly devoted to “Physician-Aided Death: The Escalating Debate,” with articles for and against the practice, including narratives by families whose loved ones chose euthanasia. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, no. 1 (1996): 7–166.Google Scholar
Playing on the famous battle for the bridge at Arnhem during World War II. See van Leeuwen, E. Kimsma, G.K., “Philosophy of Medical Practice: A Discursive Approach,” Theoretical Medicine, 18, nos. 1–2 (1997): Forthcoming.Google Scholar
See the entire issue of Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2, no. 1 (1993): 9–80, which is devoted to descriptions and analyses of the Dutch euthanasia situation.Google Scholar
Dillman, R.J.M., “Euthanasia in the Netherlands: The Role of the Dutch Medical Profession,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, no. 1 (1996): 100–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Netherlands Eases Curbs on Euthanasia,” Chicago Tribune, Feb. 10, 1993, at 1, 13.Google Scholar
Kimsma, G.K. van Leeuwen, E., “Dutch Euthanasia: Background, Practice, and Present Justifications,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2, no. 1 (1993): 19–31.Google Scholar
Los Angeles Times News Service, “Euthanasia Doesn't Always End Families' Pain,” Orlando Sentinel, Mar. 14, 1993, at A12.Google Scholar
Klotzko, A.J., “CQ Interview: Dr. Baudewijn Chabot on Assisted Suicide in the Absence of Somatic Illness,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 4, no. 2 (1995): 239–49.Google Scholar
Colleagues and I have submitted a manuscript portraying all levels of the Dutch debate. Thomasma, D.C.et al., Asking to Die: Inside the Dutch Debate about Euthanasia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): Under consideration.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Kevorkian was indicted on November 7, 1996.Google Scholar
“Kevorkian Cleared of Murder Charge,” Chicago Tribune, July 22, 1992, at 1, 3.Google Scholar
Hughes, J., “Coroner Finds No Illness in Kevorkian's Latest Suicide,” Chicago Sun-Times, Aug. 20, 1996, at 3; and Jouzaitis, C., “New Scrutiny for Kevorkian,” Chicago Tribune, Aug. 23, 1996, at 1:1.Google Scholar
See Hughes, , id.; and Jouzaitis, , id.Google Scholar
Anonymous, “Kevorkian Helps Another Woman Commit Suicide,” Chicago Tribune, Nov. 29, 1992, at 1, 5.Google Scholar
Bartholome, W., Post: Execution Case—Reply (visited Aug. 12, 1996), Medical College of Wisconsin Bioethics Network.Google Scholar
Prodis, J., “Kevorkian Aids Man, Ind. Woman in Suicides,” Chicago Sun-Times, Feb. 5, 1993, at 30(w).Google Scholar
Id.; and Bartholome, , supra note 36.Google Scholar
Bartholome, , supra note 36.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Bennahum, D.A., “Encounters with Death,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, no. 1 (1996): 7–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Quill, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Brahams, D., “Euthanasia: Doctor Convicted of Attempted Murder,” Lancet, 340 (1992): 782–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblatt, S.M., Murder or Mercy: Euthanasia on Trial (Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Kass, L.R., “‘I Will Give No Deadly Drug.’ Why Doctors Must Not Kill,” American College of Surgeons Bulletin, 77, no. 3 (1992): 7–17.Google Scholar
Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington, 79 F.3d 790 (en banc) reh'g en banc by full court denied, 85 F.3d 1440 (9th Cir. 1996).Google Scholar
Garrow, D.J., “The Justices' Life-or-Death Choices,” New York Times, Apr. 3, 1996, at 1. After an en banc hearing, by an 8-to-3 decision, the original appeals decision was overturned, and a judgment was made that the law violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. See 79 F.3d 790.Google Scholar
Lee v. State of Oregon, 891 F. Supp. 1429 (1995).Google Scholar
Quill v. Koppell, 870 F. Supp. 78 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).Google Scholar
Quill v. Vacco, 80 F.3d 716 (2d Cir. 1996).Google Scholar
Id. Judge Calabresi argued that laws against assisted suicide are conceivable if they provide equal protection. He further argued that state representatives are best able to want and defend laws that may be constitutionally suspect.Google Scholar
Poweres, J. Anderson, L., “Courts Give Boost to Assisted Suicide,” Chicago Tribune, Apr. 16, 1996, at 1:4.Google Scholar
Reuters, , “Australia Split as Euthanasia Law Takes Effect,” Chicago Tribune, July 1, 1996, at 1:9.Google Scholar
Martin, G.L., “Northern Australia Legalizes Euthanasia—with Limits,” Chicago Sun-Times, Apr. 14, 1996, at 32.Google Scholar
Kerridge, I.H. Mitchell, K.R., “The Legislation of Active Voluntary Euthanasia in Australia: Will the Slippery Slope Prove Fatal?,” Journal of Medical Ethics, 22 (1996): 273–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmetzer, U., “A Catch in Australia's Suicide Law: Doctors, Psychiatrists Refuse to Give Required Consent,” Chicago Tribune, July 27, 1996, at 1:1.Google Scholar
Battin, M.P., Ethical Issues in Suicide (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1982); and Graber, G.C., “The Rationality of Suicide,” in Wallace, S. Ester, A., eds., Suicide and Euthanasia: The Rights of Personhood (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1981): 51–65.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.-M., “The Sacredness of Life in Pagan Philosophy,” Dolentium Hominum, 11, no. 31 (1996): At 56.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, H.T. Jr., Bioethics and Secular Humanism (Philadelphia: Trinity Press International, 1992). See also Brandt, R., “The Morality and Rationality of Suicide,” in Rachels, J., ed., Moral Problems (New York: Harper and Row, 1975): 363–87.Google Scholar
Jochemsen, H., Euthanasia: A Christian Evaluation (Oxford: Latimer House Studies #49, 1995).Google Scholar
Choron, J., Suicide (New York: Scribner's Sons, 1972): At 100.Google Scholar
Prado, C.G., The Last Choice: Preemptive Suicide in Advanced Age (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Erikson, E., Childhood and Society (New York: Norton, 2d ed., 1963): At 268.Google Scholar
Moody, H.R., Ethics in an Aging Society (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992): At 86.Google Scholar
Kane, G.C., “Suicide and Advance Directives: One Doctor's Dilemma,” Journal of Medical Humanities, 17, no. 3 (1996): 191–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dep't of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).Google Scholar
See Quill, Cassel, Meier, , supra note 8.Google Scholar
“Study Puts High Cost on Care for Dying,” Chicago Tribune, Feb. 10, 1993, at 1, 12.Google Scholar
Battin, M.P., “Euthanasia: The Fundamental Issues,” in Battin, M.P., Least Worst Death: Essays in Bioethics on the End of Life (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994): At 101–29. Unlike Alexander Capron, Battin thinks that assisted suicide is a better first option than euthanasia, because it depends so thoroughly on the patient's own assessment of the relationship between suffering and continued existence or death. She would reserve euthanasia for those who choose it ahead of time but are no longer able to request it near the time of death.Google Scholar
Thomasma, D.C. Graber, G.C., Euthanasia: Toward an Ethical Social Policy (New York: Continuum Publishing, 1990).Google Scholar
Capron, A., “Legalizing Physician-Aided Death,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, no. 1 (1996): 10–23, esp. 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, A.E., “Risk-Benefit Ratio: The Soft Underbelly of Patient Autonomy,” Issues in Law & Medicine, 7 (1991): 139–54.Google Scholar
Cameron, N.M. de S., The New Medicine: Life and Death After Hippocrates (Wheaton: Crossway Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Cassell, E., “The Relief of Suffering,” Archives of Internal Medicine, 143 (1993): 522–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, , “Missouri and Kevorkian Continue to Provoke Controversy,” Hospital Ethics, 8, no. 6 (1992): 9.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Pellegrino, E.D. Thomasma, D.C., For the Patient's Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988); and Loewy, E.,“Beneficence in Trust,” Hastings Center Report, 19, no. 1 (1989): 42–43; and Beauchamp, T. Childress, J., Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 3rd ed., 1994).Google Scholar
Gaylin, W.et al., “Doctors Must Not Kill,” JAMA, 259 (1988): 2139-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kass, L., “Arguments Against Active Euthanasia by Doctors Found at Medicine's Core,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Newsletter, 3 (1989): 1–3, 6.Google Scholar
Muller, J. Koenig, B., “On the Boundary of Life and Death: The Definition of Dying by Medical Residents,” in Lock, M. Gordon, D., eds., Biomedicine Examined (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 1988): 351–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illich, I., Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health (New York: Pantheon Boob, 1976): At 106.Google Scholar
Id. at 154.Google Scholar
Thomasma, D.C., “The Ethics of Caring for Vulnerable Individuals,” in Reflections on Ethics (Washington, D.C.: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 1990): 39–45.Google Scholar
Proctor, R.N., “Nazi Doctors, Racial Medicine, and Human Experimentation,” in Annas, G.J. Grodin, M.A., eds., The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992): At 23.Google Scholar
Kevorkian, J., Prescription—Medicide: The Goodness of Planned Death (Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Pernick, M.S., The Black Stork: Eugenics and the Death of “Defective” Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures Since 1915 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Kilner, J.F. Miller, A.B. Pellegrino, E.D., eds., Dignity and Dying: A Christian Appraisal (Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans, 1996).Google Scholar
Wiesel, E., “Preface,” in Annas, G.J. Grodin, M.A., eds., The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992): At vii.Google Scholar
Annas, G.J. Grodin, M.A., “Introduction,” in Annas, G.J. Grodin, M.A., eds., The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992): At 3.Google Scholar
See Proctor, supra note 86, at 17–31.Google Scholar
Id. at 24.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Wiesel, supra note 90.Google Scholar
Thomasma, Graber, , supra note 72.Google Scholar
Rachels, J., “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” N. Engl. J. Med., 292 (1975): 78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Cassell, E., “The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine,” N. Engl. J. Med., 306 (1982): 639–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See Battin, supra note 71.Google Scholar
Kohl, M., “Altruistic Humanism and Voluntary Beneficent Euthanasia,” Issues in Law & Medicine, 8 (1992): 331–42.Google Scholar
Admiraal, P., “Justifiable Active Euthanasia in the Netherlands,” in Baird, R.M. Rosenbaum, S.E., eds., Euthanasia: The Moral Issues (Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1989): 125–28.Google Scholar
See Quill, Cassel, Meier, , supra note 8.Google Scholar
Helme, T. Padfield, N., “Safeguarding Euthanasia,” New Law Journal, Oct. 2 (1992): 1335-36.Google Scholar
Campbell, C.S., “Religious Ethics and Active Euthanasia in a Pluralistic Society,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 2 (1992): 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresnahan, J., “Observations on the Rejection of Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Roman Catholic Perspective,” Christian Bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, 1 (1995): 256–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaylin, et al., supra note 80.Google Scholar
House of Delegates of the American Medical Association, Dec. 4, 1973, as quoted in Rachels, supra note 96, at 97.Google Scholar
Welie, J.V.M., “The Medical Exception: Physicians, Euthanasia and the Dutch Criminal Law,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17 (1992): 419–37. See the objections raised to PAS and euthanasia in Newsletter of Evangelical Churches, “Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide,” Discernment, 1, no. 3 (1992): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C.S., “Aid-in-Dying' and the Taking of Human Life,” Journal of Medical Ethics, 18 (1992): 128–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrino, E.D., “Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide,” in Kilner, J.F. Miller, A.B. Pellegrino, E.D., eds., Dignity and Dying: A Christian Appraisal (Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans, 1996): At 117.Google Scholar
As quoted in Wilkes, P. Carter, S.L., “The Case Against Doctor-Assisted Suicide—The Next Pro-Lifers,” New York Times Magazine, July 21, 1996, at 22.Google Scholar
Brody, H., “Assisted Death—A Compassionate Response to a Medical Failure,” N. Engl. J. Med., 327 (1992): 1384-88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasma, D.C., “Models of the Doctor-Patient Relationship and the Ethics Committee, Part Two,” Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 3, no. 1 (1993): 10–26.Google Scholar
Gevers, J.K.M., “Legislation on Euthanasia: Recent Developments in the Netherlands,” Journal of Medical Ethics, 18 (1992): 138–41; and Kimsma, G.K., “Clinical Ethics in Assisting Euthanasia: Avoiding Malpractice in Drug Application,” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17 (1992): 439–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhse, H. Singer, P., “Euthanasia: A Survey of Nurses' Attitudes and Practices,” Australian Nurses Journal, 21, no. 8 (1992): 21–22. Note that the same percentage occurs among Australian citizens; about 76 percent of those surveyed supported allowing physicians to offer lethal doses of medication on request to “hopelessly ill” patients “in great pain.” Sixty-six percent of nurses surveyed said that patients had asked nurses to kill them at some time in their practice at least once, and 85 percent said that they participated in ending a patient's life directly when asked to do so by a doctor.Google Scholar
Evidence exists that hardship leads people to forgo long-term care and to opt for comfort care. See “Hardship Drives Patients to Forgo Long-Term Care,” Chicago Tribune, Aug. 12, 1996, at 1:3.Google Scholar
Anonymous, “Hospitals, Physicians Paying More Attention to Pain Control,” Medical Ethics Advisor, 7, no. 11 (1991): 133–37.Google Scholar
Winslade, W., “Teaching About Dying,” Choice in Dying News, 1, no. 4 (1992): 1, 6.Google Scholar
Selib Epstein, S., “What the Dying Give to the Living,” Chicago Tribune, Dec. 11, 1992, at 1, 21.Google Scholar
Kamm, F.M., Morality, Mortality (New York: Oxford University Press, vol. 2, 1996): At 58–59; and Tulsky, J.A. Alpers, A. Lo, B., “A Middle Ground on Physician-Assisted Suicide,” Cambridge Quarterly in Healthcare Ethics, 5, no. 1 (1996): 33–43.Google Scholar
Hutchcraft, C., “Doctors Belong with Patients to the End,” Chicago Tribune, Aug. 16, 1996, at 2:1–2. This is an excellent commentary on the AMA's position against PAS.Google Scholar
Miles, S.H., “Physicians and Their Patients' Suicides,” JAMA, 271 (1994): At 1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Board of Internal Medicine, Caring for the Dying: Identification and Promotion of Physician Competency. Parts One and Two, Narratives and Educational Resource Development (Philadelphia: American Board of Internal Medicine, 1996).Google Scholar
Wilson Ross, J., “Review: The Future of Dying,” Western Bioethics News, July (1996): At 4.Google Scholar
Witsenburg, B.C., “Dood op Verzoek” (“Death on Request”), Medisch Contact, 50 (1995): 1293-94.Google Scholar
Thomasma, D.C., Human Life in the Balance (Louisville: Westminster Press, 1990).Google Scholar