Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:33:40.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic Testing and the Social Responsibility of Private Health Insurance Companies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Over the next 15 years, the government-funded human genome project will map and sequence each of the human cell’s estimated 100,000 genes. The project’s first fruits will be a vast quantity of information about genetic disease. This information will contribute to the design of quicker, cheaper and more accurate tests for identifying deleterious genes in individuals. Because genetic conditions are often regarded as “immutable, heritable taints that intrinsically implicate the bearer’s identity,” overly-deterministic interpretations of genetic information can readily distort genetic risk and become enshrined in institutional policies of social isolation and discrimination.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goffman, Erving, Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar
Watson, James D. Cook-Deegan, Robert Mullan,“The Human Genome Project and International Health,” JAMA 263, 1990: 33223324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juengst, Eric T., “Priorities in Professional Ethics and Social Policy for Human Genetics,” JAMA 266, 1991: 18351836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, Medical Testing and Health Insurance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1988.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy Tancredi, Laurence, Dangerous Diagnostics. New York: Basic Books, chapters 1,4.Google Scholar
See OTA, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Brownlee, Shannon Silberner, Joanne. “The Assurance of Genes,” U.S. News and World Report. July 23, 1990: 5759; Billings, Paul R. Kohn, Mel A. de Cuevas, Margaret Beckwith, Jonathan Alper, Joseph S. Natowicz, Marvin R., “Discrimination as a Consequence of Genetic Testing,” American Journal of Human Genetics 50, 1992: 476–482.Google Scholar
See OTA, supra note 4.Google Scholar
Holtzman, Neil A., Proceed with Caution: Predicting Genetic Risks in the Recombinant DNA Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989. Chapters 8, 9.Google Scholar
Motulsky, Arno, “Impact of Genetic Manipulation on Society and Medicine,” Journal of Occupational Medicine 25, 1983:451454; Hastings Center Report 13, 1983: 5–8; Office of Technology Assessment, Genetic Monitoring and Screening in the Work Place, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1989; Uzych, L., “Genetic Testing and Exclusionary Practices in the Work Place,” Journal of Public Health and Policy, 1986: 37–57; Rothstein, Mark A., Medical Screening and the Employee Health Cost Crisis, Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., 10989, Chapter 11; Cotton, Paul, “Preexisting Conditions Hold Americans Hostage to Employers and Insurance Companies,” JAMA 265, 1991: 2451–3; Schorr, Alvin L., “Job Turnover—A Problem with Employer-Based Health Care,”New England Journal of Medicine 323, 1990: 543–545; See also Billings, supra note 8.Google Scholar
Jensen, Gail A. Morrissey, Michael A. Marcus, John W., “Cost Sharing and the Changing Pattern of Employer-Sponsored Health Benefits,” Milbank Quarterly 65, 1987: 521550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Gail A. Gabel, Jon R., “The Erosion of Purchased Health Responsibility.” Inquiry 25, 1988: 328343.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L. Bowie, Norman E., “Corporate Social Responsibility,” in Beauchamp, Tom L. Bowie, Norman E. eds., Ethical Theory and Business, 2nd ed. Cliffs, Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983: 52–57; Durkheim, Emile, The Rules of Sociological Method, trans. Solovay, S. and Mueller, J., New York: Free Press, 1964, p. 7; French, Peter, Collective and Corporate Responsibility, New York: Columbia University Press,1984, p.13; Goodpaster, Kenneth E., “The Concept of Corporate Responsibility,” in Regan, Tom ed., Just Business. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1983: 292–323; May, Larry, The Morality of Groups, Notre Da: University of Notre Dame, 1987, pp. 11 ff.Google Scholar
Starr, Paul, The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982), pp. 290 ff.Google Scholar
Davis, Keith, “An Expanded View of the Social Responsibility of Businesses,” In Beauchamp, Tom L. Bowie, Norman E. eds., Ethical Theory and Business, 2nd ed. Cliffs, Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983: 9497.Google Scholar
Tax Reform Bill of 1986 (H.R. 3838). In Standard Federal Tax Reports, vol. 78, no. 41, filed September 21, 1986, part II (Chicago: Commerce Clearing House, Inc., 1986), at Title X, Section pp. 346 ff.Google Scholar
Council on Ehtical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, “Use of Genetic Testing by Employers,” JAMA 266, 1991: 18271830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chren, Mary-Margaret Landefeld, Seth Murray, Thomas H., “Doctors, Drug Companies and Gifts,” JAMA 262, 1989: 34483451; Camenisch, Paul F., “Gift and Gratitude in Ethics,” Journal of Religious Ethics 9, 1981: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reported in Leon E. Hay, Accounting for Governmental and Nonprofit Entities, eighth edition. (Homewood, Illinois: Irwin, 1989), p.2.Google Scholar
Rothman, David J., “The Public Presentation of Blue Cross, 1935–1965,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 16: 671693, at 671; Padgug, Robert A., “Looking Backward: Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield as an Object of Historical Analysis,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 16, 1991: 793–805; Brown, Lawrence D., “Capture and Culture: Organizational Identity in New York Blue Cross,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 16, 1991: 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blue Cross, Blue Shield, Health Care in America: Promoting Access and Pursuing Value. Approved by the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Board of Directors, June 28, 1990.Google Scholar
Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Mission Statement. Approved by the Group Health Cooperative Board of Trustees, Seattle, Washington, October 23, 1991.Google Scholar
Mutual of Omaha, Sales Principles and Practices, 1987.Google Scholar
Simon, John G. Powers, Charles W. Gunneman, Jon P., “The Responsibilities of Corporations and Their Owners,” in Beauschamp, Tom L. Bowie, Norman E. eds., Ethical Theory and Business, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1983: 8693, at pp. 9192.Google Scholar
Steiner, George A. Steiner, John F., “The Social Responsibilities of Business,” in Steiner, George A. Steiner, John F., eds., Business, Government and Society: A Managerial Perspective, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991: 117153.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Campbell, R.H. Skinner, A.S., eds, New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1962, pp. 133136; Levitt, Theodore, “The Dangers of Social Responsibility,” Harvard Business Review, September-October, 1958.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom, Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1983, p. 137.Google Scholar
Gostin, Larry, “Genetic Discrimination: The Use of Genetically-Based Diagnostic and Prognostic Tests by Employers and Insurers,” American Journal of Law and Medicine XVII, 1991: 109144; Alexander Morgan Capron, “Which Ills to Bear: Reevaluating the Threat of Modern Genetics,” Emory Law Journal 39, 1990: 666696, especially pp. 684 ff.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Mark A., “Discriminatory Aspects of Medical Screening,” Journal of Occupational Medicine 28, 1986: 930–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Union v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 886 F2d 871 (7th cir 1989), cert granted 58 USLW 3614 (1990); Becker, Mary E., “Can Employers Exclude Women to Protect Children?” JAMA 264, 1990: 21132117; Annas, George J., “Fetal Protection and Employment Discrimination,” New England Journal of Medicine 325, 1991: 740–744; Lippman, Abby, “Prenatal Genetic Testing and Screening: Constructing Needs and Reinforcing Inequities,” American Journal of Law and Medicine XVII, 19991: 15–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldblum, Chai R., “Employment protections.” Milbank Quarterly 69, supp 1/2, 1991: 81110. Orentlicher, David “Genetic Screening by Employers.” JAMA 263, 1990: 1005–1006. Jones, Nancy Lee, “Essential Requirements of the Act,” Milbank Quarterly 69, supp 1/2, 1991: 25–54; Joint Working Group on Ethical Legal and Social Issues in Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Human Genome Research, Statement on Genetic Discrimination and the Americans with Disabilities Act, April 29, 1991, Meeting at Los Alamos National Laboratory; see also Motulsry, supra note 11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wines, Michael, “Bush Announces Health Plan to Help the Poor Pay for Care,” New York Times, February 7, 1992, A1 col. 1; C18 col. 4.Google Scholar
Holahan, John Moon, Marilyn Welch, Pete Zuckerman, Stephen, “An American Approach to Health System Reform,” JAMA 265, 1991: 2537: 2540; Pear, Robert,“Senate Democrats to Offer Plan to Restrain Health-Care Costs,” New York Times May 5, 1991. A1 col. 1, A8 col. 4; Rockefeller, John D. IV, “A Call for Action: The Pepper Commission's Blueprint for Health Care Reform,” JAMA 265, 1991: 2507-2510; Todd, James Seekins, Steven V. Krichbaum, John A. Harvey, Lynn K., “Health Access America: Strengthening the US Health Care System,” JAMA 265, 1991: 2503–2506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumbach, Keven Bodenheimer, Thomas Himmelstein, David Woolhandler, Steffie, “Liberal Benefits, Conservative Spending: The Physicians for a National Health Program Proposal,” JAMA 265, 1991: 25492554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar