Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:07:20.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Research Subject Injury Compensation: The Ongoing Search for Fairness, Consistency and Clarity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Independent Articles: Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapman, C. R, Sukumaran, S., Tsegaye, G. T., Shevchenko, Y., and Caplan, A. L, “The Quest for Compensation for Research-Related Injury in the United States: A New Proposal,” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 47, no. 4 (2019): 732747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2018, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, G.S.R. 104(E) (Feb. 1, 2018).Google Scholar
Chingarande, G. R and Moodley, K., “Disparate Compensation Policies for Research Related Injury in an Era of Multinational Trials: A Case Study of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa,” BMC Medical Ethics (2018), available at <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816510/> (last visited November 13, 2019).Google Scholar
See id. (“There is need for consistency and even harmonization of such regulations at a global level. A model policy on compensation for research related injuries should borrow from the best aspects of the different policies of the BRICS countries and should be informed by the cardinal ethics principles of autonomy, justice and beneficence.”)Google Scholar