Probabilistic corpus-based dialectometry

Christoph Wolk; Benedikt Szmrecsanyi

doi:10.1017/jlg.2018.6

Probabilistic corpus-based dialectometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 August 2018

Christoph Wolk and

Benedikt Szmrecsanyi

Show author details

Christoph Wolk: Affiliation:
University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
Benedikt Szmrecsanyi: Affiliation:
KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Article contents

Abstract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

Researchers in dialectometry have begun to explore measurements based on fundamentally quantitative metrics, often sourced from dialect corpora, as an alternative to the traditional signals derived from dialect atlases. This change of data type amplifies an existing issue in the classical paradigm, namely that locations may vary in coverage and that this affects the distance measurements: pairs involving a location with lower coverage suffer from greater noise and therefore imprecision. We propose a method for increasing robustness using generalized additive modeling, a statistical technique that allows leveraging the spatial arrangement of the data. The technique is applied to data from the British English dialect corpus FRED; the results are evaluated regarding their interpretability and according to several quantitative metrics. We conclude that data availability is an influential covariate in corpus-based dialectometry and beyond, and recommend that researchers be aware of this issue and of methods to alleviate it.

Type: Articles
Information: Journal of Linguistic Geography , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , April 2018 , pp. 56 - 75

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2018.6 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldenderfer, Mark S. & Blashfield, Roger K.. 1984. Cluster analysis. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2009. Corpus linguistics and dialectology. In Lüdeling, Anke & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, Handbücher Zur Sprach- Und Kommunikationswissenschaft /Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 29(1), 1126–39. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Branigan, Holly. 2007. Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(1/2). 1-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2006.00001.x.Google Scholar

Britain, David. 2010. Grammatical variation in the contemporary spoken English of England. In Kirkpatrick, Andy (ed.), The handbook of world Englishes, 37-58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Jack K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Viv & Whittle, Pamela. 1989. Urban British dialect grammar: the question of dialect levelling. English World-Wide 10. 185-225.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Jacob. 2018. Identifying regional dialects in on‐line social media. In Boberg, Charles, John Nerbonne & Dominic Watts (eds.), The handbook of dialectology. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans. 1977. Rätoromanisch versus Hochitalienisch versus Oberitalienisch. Ladinia 1. 39-71.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans. 1982. Dialektometrie: Prinzipien und methoden des einsatzes der numerischen taxonomie im bereich der dialektgeographie. Wien: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans. 1984. Dialektometrische studien: Anhand Italoromanischer, Rätoromanischer Und Galloromanischer sprachmaterialien aus AIS und ALF. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans. 1993. Dialectometry: A short overview of the principles and practice of quantitive classification of linguistic atlas data. In Köhler, Reinhard & Burghard Rieger (eds.), Contributions to Quantitative Linguistics: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Quantitative Linguistics, QUALICO, Trier, 1991, 277–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Goebl, Hans. 2007. A bunch of dialectometric flowers: A brief introduction to dialectometry. In Smit, Ute, Stefan Dollinger, Julia Hüttner, Gunter Kaltenböck & Ursula Lutzky (eds.), Tracing English through time: Explorations in language variation, 133-172. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar

Great Britain Historical GIS Project. 2004. Great Britain Historical GIS. University of Portsmouth.Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2012. Frequencies, probabilities, and association measures in usage-/exemplar-based linguistics: Some necessary clarifications. Studies in Language 36(3). 477-510.Google Scholar

Grieve, Jack. 2014. A comparison of statistical methods for the aggregation of regional linguistic variation. In Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech, Lingua & Litterae 2853-2888. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Grieve, Jack. 2016. Regional variation in written American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Measuring dialect pronunciation differences using Levenshtein distance. Groningen, Netherlands: University of Groningen dissertation.Google Scholar

Hilbe, Joseph M. 2007. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hernández, Nuria. 2006. User’s guide to FRED. Freiburg: University of Freiburg.Google Scholar

Huang, Yuan, Guo, Diansheng, Kasakoff, Alice & Grieve, Jack. 2016. Understanding US regional linguistic variation with Twitter data analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 59. 244-255.Google Scholar

Jain, Anil K., Murty, M. Narasimha & Flynn, Patrick J.. 1999. Data clustering: A review. ACM Computing Surveys 31(3). 264-323.Google Scholar

James, Gareth, Witten, Daniela, Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Robert. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Jankowski, Bridget. 2004. A transatlantic perspective of variation and change in English deontic modality. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 23(2). 85-113.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2004. Global synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in English. In Bernd Kortmann, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds.), A Handbook of varieties of English vol. 2. 1142-1202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kortmann, Bernd & Christoph Wolk. 2012. Morphosyntactic Variation in the Anglophone World: A Global Perspective. In Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds.), The Mouton World Atlas of Variation in English. 906-936. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Manning, Chris & Schütze, Hinrich. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nerbonne, John. 2009. Data-driven dialectology. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 175-198.Google Scholar

Nerbonne, John. 2010. Measuring the diffusion of linguistic change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365. 3821-3828.Google Scholar

Nerbonne, John & Kleiweg, Peter. 2007. Toward a dialectological yardstick. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 14(2). 148-166.Google Scholar

Nerbonne, John, Heeringa, Wilbert & Kleiweg, Peter. 1999. Edit distance and dialect proximity. In David Sankoff & Joseph B. Kruskal (eds.), Time Warps, String Edits and Macromolecules: The Theory and Practice of Sequence Comparison. Stanford: CSLI Press.Google Scholar

Nerbonne, John, Kleiweg, Peter, Manni, Franz & Heeringa, Wilbert. 2008. Projecting dialect differences to geography: Bootstrapping clustering vs. clustering with noise. In Christine Preisach, Lars Schmidt-Thieme, Hans Burkhardt & Reinhold Decker (eds.), Data analysis, machine learning, and applications. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the German Classification Society, 647-654. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Orton, Harold, Sanderson, Stewart & Widdowson, J. D. A.. 1978. The Linguistic Atlas of England. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Pickl, Simon, Spettl, Aaron, Pröll, Simon, Elspaß, Stephan, König, Werner & Schmidt, Volker. 2014. Linguistic distances in dialectometric intensity estimation. Journal of Linguistic Geography 2(1). 25-40.Google Scholar

Sankoff, David. 1987. Variable Rules. In Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar & Klaus J. Mattheier (eds.), Sociolinguistics / Soziolinguistik: An International Handbook / Ein internationales Handbuch, Vol.2, 984-997. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Séguy, Jean. 1971. La relation entre la distance spatiale et la distance lexicale. Revue de Linguistique Romane 35. 335-357.Google Scholar

Shackleton, R. G. 2007. Phonetic variation in the traditional English dialects: A computational analysis. Journal of English Linguistics 35(1). 30-102. doi: 10.1177/0075424206297857.Google Scholar

Spruit, Marco René. 2006. Measuring syntactic variation in Dutch dialects. Literary and Linguistic Computing 21(4). 493-506.Google Scholar

Spruit, Marco Wilbert Heeringa, René, & Nerbonne, John. 2009. Associations among linguistic levels. Lingua 119(11). 1624-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2009.02.001.Google Scholar

Streck, Tobias. 2014. Alemannisch quantitativ. Zur Erklärungskraft der Geografie für aggregierte Dialektunterschiede. In Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Peter Gilles, Helmut Spiekermann & Tobias Streck (eds.), Sprache im Gebrauch: Räumlich, zeitlich, interaktional. Festschrift für Peter Auer, 157-173. Heidelberg: Winter (OraLingua 9).Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic persistence in spoken English: A corpus study at the intersection of variationist sociolinguistics, psycholinguistics, and discourse analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2008. Corpus-based dialectometry: Aggregate morphosyntactic variability in British English dialects. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 2(1/2). 279-296.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2010. The morphosyntax of BrE dialects in a corpus-based dialectometrical perspective: Feature extraction, coding protocols, projections to geography, summary statistics. Freiburg: University of Freiburg. URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:25-Opus-73209, URL: http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/7320/.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2011. Corpus-based dialectometry: A methodological sketch. Corpora 6(1). 45-76.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. Grammatical variation in British English dialects: A study in corpus-based dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Hernández, Nuria. 2007. Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg Corpus of English Dialects Sampler (“FRED-S”). Freiburg: University of Freiburg. http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/2859/.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Wälchli, Bernhard. eds. 2014. Aggregating dialectology, typology, and register analysis: Linguistic variation in text and speech. Lingua & Litterae. 28 Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Wolk, Christoph. 2011. Holistic corpus-based dialectology. Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 11(2). 561-592.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2004. Have to, gotta, must: Grammaticalisation, variation and specialization in English deontic modality. In Christian Mair & Hans Lindquist (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 33-55. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A., Durham, Mercedes & Smith, Jennifer. 2014. Grammaticalization at an early stage: future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18(1). 75-108.Google Scholar

Tobler, Waldo. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46(2). 234-240.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1999. The dialects of England, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Viereck, Wolfgang. The Computerisation and quantification of linguistic data: Dialectometrical methods. In Alan R. Thomas (ed.), Methods in Dialectology : Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference Held At the University College of North Wales, 3rd-7th August 1987. 523-550. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Viereck, Wolfgang, Ramisch, Heinrich, Händler, Harald, Hoffmann, Petra & Putschke, Wolfgang. 1991. The Computer Developed Linguistic Atlas of England. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Ward, Joe H. Jr. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58. 236-244.Google Scholar

Wieling, Martijn, Montemagni, Simonetta, Nerbonne, John & Baayen, R. Harald. 2014. Lexical differences between Tuscan dialects and standard Italian: Accounting for geographic and sociodemographic variation using generalized additive mixed modeling. Language 90(3). 669-692.Google Scholar

Wieling, Martijn, Nerbonne, John & Baayen, R. Harald. 2011. Quantitative social dialectology: Explaining linguistic variation geographically and socially. PLoS ONE 6(9).Google Scholar

Wolk, Christoph. 2014. Integrating aggregational and probabilistic approaches to language variation. Freiburg: University of Freiburg dissertation.Google Scholar

Wolk, Christoph & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2016. Top-down and bottom-up advances in corpus-based dialectometry. In Marie-Hélène Côté, Remco Knooihuizen & John Nerbonne (eds.), The future of dialects, 225-244. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Wood, Simon N. 2006. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 1

Image 15.7 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 2

Image 15.5 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 3

Image 10.1 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 4

Image 10 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 5

Image 9 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 6

Image 10 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 7

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 8

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 9

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 10

Image 15.5 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 11

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 12

Image 24.7 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 13

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 14

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 15

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 16

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 17

Image 25.1 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 18

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 19

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 20

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 22

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 22

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 23

Image 24.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 24

Image 10 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 25

Image 9 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 26

Image 10 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 27

Image 10.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 28

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 29

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 30

Image 15.5 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 31

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 32

Image 15.4 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 33

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 34

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 35

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 37

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 38

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 39

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 40

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 41

Image 15.5 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 42

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 43

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 44

Image 15.5 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 45

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 46

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 47

Image 15.5 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 48

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 49

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 50

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 51

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 52

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 53

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 54

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 55

Image 12.8 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 56

Image 14.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 57

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 58

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 59

Image 15.3 MB

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material 60

Image 15.3 MB

Article contents

Probabilistic corpus-based dialectometry

Abstract

Access options

References

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Wolk and Szmrecsanyi supplementary material

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests