No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A note on pragmatic constraints on syntax1
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 January 2017
Abstract
This note comments on Szendrői’s (2017) claim that some of the pragmatic constraints on syntactic operations proposed in Trotzke (2015a) are not supported by convincing empirical evidence. Szendrői objects to two empirical points made by Trotzke. I will deal with these points in turn: Section 1 focuses on the syntactic flexibility of idioms discussed by Szendrői, and Section 2 replies to her comments in the domain of island effects.
- Type
- Notes and Discussion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
Footnotes
[1]
I thank Tom Wasow for discussing the idiom cases with me, and I gratefully acknowledge financial support from the German Research Foundation (DFG grant TR 1228/2-1).
References
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the nature of island constraints. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Lenertová, Denisa. 2011. Left peripheral focus: Mismatches between syntax and information structure. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
29, 169–209.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2010. On deriving the CED effects from the PIC. Linguistic Inquiry
41, 35–82.Google Scholar
Szendrői, Kriszta. 2017. Review of Andreas Trotzke, Rethinking syntactocentrism: Architectural issues and case studies at the syntax–pragmatics interface. Journal of Linguistics53.1 223–228. [Published online by Cambridge University Press, 3 October 2016; doi:10.1017/S0022226716000311.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas. 2015a. Rethinking syntactocentrism: Architectural issues and case studies at the syntax–pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas. 2015b. How bizarre! A non-syntactic constraint on idiom syntax. In Stefanowitsch, Anatol (ed.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, vol. 3, 219–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar