Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:23:16.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the semantics of classifier reduplication in Cantonese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2020

PEPPINA PO-LUN LEE*
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
*
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics and Translation, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kongctpllee@cityu.edu.hk

Abstract

This paper studies prenominal reduplicative classifier in Cantonese, which has been argued to be a distributive quantifier on a par with English every/each and Mandarin mei ‘every’, and a plural classifier giving the ‘many’ reading. The analysis I propose draws heavily on ideas introduced in the cover theory proposed by Schwarzschild (1996) and Brisson (1998, 2003), and ideas introduced by Partee (2004) and others on quantifying determiner many. I argue that prenominal reduplicative classifier is a quantifying determiner which is ambiguous between a quantifier type and a modifier type. When it occurs with the distributive quantifier dou1 ‘all’, it serves as a modifier, regulating the domain of dou1-quantification by imposing a maximizing effect on the nominal it modifies (see e.g. Link 1983; Gillon 1987; Schwarzschild 1996; Brisson 1998, 2003). Without the presence of a distributive quantifier, prenominal reduplicative classifier serves either as a modifier or as a quantifier, giving its NP a weak cardinal reading or a strong proportional reading, respectively. The proposed analysis implies that domain restriction in Chinese is overtly realized in grammatical form by means of the reduplicative classifier (when combined with a distributive quantifier) and that Chinese may have determiners, which is at least true in Cantonese.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Various versions of this paper were presented at the 12th International Workshop on Theoretical East Asian Linguistics (July 2019) and the 8th International Conference on Formal Linguistics (November 2018), and the earliest version at the 20th International Conference on Yue Dialects (December 2015). The author thanks the conference participants for all the valuable comments. Sincere thanks go to the three anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees for their detailed, important and invaluable comments and suggestions. The author alone is responsible for all potential errors that may remain in the paper. The work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No: CityU 143113) and a grant from the City University of Hong Kong (Project No: SRG-Fd 7004489). The author thus acknowledges the generous support of the relevant parties.

References

Basciano, Bianca & Melloni, Chiara. 2017. Event delimitation in Mandarin: The case of diminishing reduplication. Italian Journal of Linguistics 29.1, 147170.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael. 1974. Some extensions of a Montague fragment of English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense, vol. 2: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263929.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, Christine M.1998. Distributivity, maximality and floating quantifiers. Ph.D. dissertation, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
Brisson, Christine M. 2003. Plurals, all and the nonuniformity of collective predication. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 129184.Google Scholar
Carlson, Greg N. 1980. Reference to kinds in English. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lai-shen Lisa. 2009. On every type of quantificational expression in Chinese. In Giannakidou & Rathert (eds.), 53–75.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lai-shen Lisa & Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30.4, 509542.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lai-shen Lisa & Sybesma, Rint. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Cinque & Kayne (eds.), 259–292.Google Scholar
Cheung, Hung-nin. 1972/2007. Xianggang Yueyu Yufa de Yanjiu[A study on Cantonese grammar], Revised ed. Hong Kong: The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Kayne, Richard S. (eds.). 2005. The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte. 1993. Adverbs of quantification: A Generalized Quantifier approach. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Downing, Laura J. & Inkelas, Sharon. 2015. What is reduplication? Typology and analysis, Part 2/2: The analysis of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass 9.12, 516528.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2004. Do all quantifiers behave the same way compositionally? In R. Irurtzun & U[rtzi] Etxeberria (eds.). Selected proceedings of 1st WoSS, 446–486. Vitoria-Gasteiz: ASJU.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi. 2009. Contextually restricted quantification in Basque. In Giannakidou & Rathert (eds.), 76–107.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi & Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2010. Contextual domain restriction and the definite determiner. In Recanati, Francois, Stojanovic, Isidora & Villanueva, Neftali (eds.), Context-dependence, perspective and relativity (Mouton Series in Pragmatics 6), 93126. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Etxeberria, Urtzi & Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2014. D-heads, domain restriction, and variation: From Greek and Basque to Salish. In Schürcks, Lilia, Giannakidou, Anastasia & Etxeberria, Urtzi (eds.), Studies in generative grammar: The nominal structure in Slavic and beyond, 413487. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Fiengo, Robert & Lasnik, Howard. 1973. The logical structure of reciprocal sentences in English. Foundations of Language 9, 447468.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2004. Domain restriction and the arguments of quantificational determiners. In Young, Robert B. (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV (SALT 14), 110126. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen. 2006. (In)definiteness polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23, 135183.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia & Rathert, Monika (eds.). 2009. Quantification, definiteness & nominalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillon, Brendan S. 1987. The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 10.2, 199219.10.1007/BF00584318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillon, Brendan S. 2008. On the semantics/pragmatics distinction. Synthese 165, 373384.10.1007/s11229-007-9186-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1981. ReciprocaliInterpretation. Journal of Linguistic Research 1.3, 97117.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack. 1983. Plurality and conjunction. In ter Meulen, Alice G. B. (ed.), Studies in model-theoretic semantics (Groningen–Amsterdam Studies in Semantics (Grass) 1), 6383. Foris: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Huang, Shizhe. 1996. Quantification and predication in Mandarin: A case study ofdou. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 2014. Non-concatenative derivation: Reduplication. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavel (eds.), Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 169189. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Downing, Laura J.. 2015. What is reduplication? Typology and analysis, Part 1/2: The analysis of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass 9.12, 502515.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans. 1981. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Groenendijk, Jeroen A. G., Janssen, Theo M. V. & Stokhof, Martin J. B. (eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (Part I), 277322. Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In Carlson, Gregory N. & Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.), The generic book, 398411. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Hun-tak Thomas. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Li, Xuping. 2011. On the semantics of classifiers in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.Google Scholar
Liao, Hsiu-chen. 2011. Alternatives and exhaustification: Non-interrogative uses of Chinesewh-words. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-wang. 1998. Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6.2, 201243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linguistic Society of Hong Kong 1993/2002. Yueyu Pinyin Zidian [A dictionary of Cantonese romanization], 2nd edn. Hong Kong: The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plural and mass nouns: A lattice theoretic approach. In Bäuerle, Rainer, Schwarze, Christoph & von Stechow, Arnim (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, 302323. Berlin: de Gruyer.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-hsi. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Liu, Mingming. 2017. Varieties of alternatives: Mandarin focus particles. Linguistics and Philosophy 40, 6195.Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 1987. Quantification as a major module of natural language semantics. In Groenendijk, Jeroen A. G., de Jongh, Dick & Stokhof, Martin J. B. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (Groningen–Amsterdam Studies in Semantics (Grass) 8), 5385. Foris: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Luo, Qiong-peng. 2011. Meiand dou in Chinese: A tale of two quantifiers. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 9.2, 111158.Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa. 2002. Contextual variables. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Martí, Luisa. 2009. Contextual restrictions on indefinites: Spanish algunosvs. unos. In Giannakidou & Rathert (eds.), 108132.Google Scholar
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia. 1994/2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthewson, Lisa. 2001. Quantification and the nature of crosslinguistic variation. Natural Language Semantics 9, 145189.Google Scholar
Melloni, Chiara & Basciano, Bianca. 2018. Reduplication across boundaries: The case of Mandarin. In Bonami, Olivier, Boyé, Gilles, Dal, Georgette, Giraudo, Hélène & Namer, Fiammetta (eds.), The lexeme in descriptive and theoretical morphology, 325362. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3.1, 129.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 2004. Many quantifiers. Compositionality in formal semantics: Selected papers by Barbara H. Partee, 241258. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, Mats E.1985. Association with Focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst. [Distributed by GLSA, Amherst]Google Scholar
Rothesin, Susan. 2017. Semantics for counting and measuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1996. Pluralities. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in southeast Asian languages. In Cinque & Kayne (eds.), 806–838.Google Scholar
Song, Yuzhu. 1978. Guanyu shuci ‘yi’ he liangci xiang-jiehe de chongdie wenti [On the issue of the combination of the numeral yi‘one’ and reduplicate classifiers]. Nankai Daxue Xuebao [Nankai journal] 6, 8592.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2002. Nominal restriction. In Preyer, Gerhard & Peter, Georg (eds.), Logical form and language, 365388. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason & Szabó, Zoltan. 2000. On quantifier domain restriction. Mind and Language 15, 219261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steindl, Ulrike. 2010. Grammatical issues in the Chinese classifier system: The case of classifier reduplication. M.Phil. thesis, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Sui, Na & Jianhua, Hu. 2017. Liangci chongdie de jufa [The syntax of classifier reduplication]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 1, 22–41.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint. 2007. Beifang fangyan ge Yueyu zhong mingci de keshubiaoji [Markers of countability on the noun in Mandarin and Cantonese]. Yuyanxue luncong[Essays in linguistics] 35, 234–245.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi & Tsai, Yaping. 2005. Domain restrictions for distributive quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14, 89120.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 2001. The syntax of reduplication. In Kim, Minjoo & Strauss, Uri (eds.), Proceedings of Northeast Linguistics Society 31 (NELS 31), 454469. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa. 2003. Reduplication feeds syntax. In Stanca Somesfalean (ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association (CLA ’03), 236–247. Montréal: Université du Québec à Montréal.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 1998. The semantics and pragmatics of quantifier domains. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Wang, Jian. 2013. Liexingxue shiye xia de hanyufangyan ‘laing-ming’ jiegou yanjiu[Bare classifier phrases in Sinitic languages: A typological perspective]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic sciences] 12.4, 383393.Google Scholar
Westerståhl, Dag. 1984. Determiners and context sets. In Johan van Benthem & Alice [G. B.] ter Meulen (eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language, 45–71. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Xiang, Ming. 2008. Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin dou . Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17, 227245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Kairong. 2004. Liang-ci congdie jushi yu ‘mei’ jushi zai yuyi gongneng ji jufa shang de xiangtong [The similarity between sentences with reduplicative classifier and mei-sentences in their semantic and syntactic properties]. Contemporary Research in Modern Chinese2004, 18.Google Scholar
Yang, Kairong. 2015. On the semantic functions of three different types of classifier reduplication in Mandarin Chinese. In Xu, Dan & Jingqi, Fu (eds.), New studies of space and quantification in languages of China, 20172032. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Yang, Rong. 2001. Common nouns, classifiers and quantification in Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Yang, Xuemei. 2002. Ge-ge, mei-ge he yi-ge-(yi)-ge de yufa yuyi fenxi [A syntactic and semantic analysis of ge-ge, mei-geand yi-ge- (yi)-ge]. Shijie hanyu jiaoxue 4, 2631.Google Scholar
Yip, Chak-lam. 2015. On CL–CL quantifier phrases in Mandarin and Cantonese. Presented at the 20th International Conference on Yue Dialects, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, N. Niina. 2013. Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qingwen & Tang, Sze-wing. 2013. A cross-dialectal study of classifier reduplication. Presented in the Workshop on the Grammar of Measurement in Chinese, Taipei, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qingwen & Tang, Sze-wing. 2018. A cross-dialectal study of classifier reduplication. Ms., Guangdong University of Foreign Studies & The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi [Lectures on grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar