We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Lg49. 765–793.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. (1973). Structural aspects of language change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. & Jones, C. (1974). Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics.Amsterdam:North Holland.Google Scholar
Anttila, R. (1974). Analogy. University of Helsinki Dress Rehearsals No. 1.Google Scholar
Arlotto, A. (1972). Introduction to historical linguistics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cole, P. (1974). Backward pronominalization and analogy. LIn5. 425–443.Google Scholar
King, R. D. (1969). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1965). Phonological change. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J. (1945–1949). La nature des procès dits ‘analogiques’. AL5. 15–37.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. (1973). Historical linguistics: an introduction. 2nd ed.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. P. & Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds.) (1972). Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E. H. (1917). Linguistic change. Reprinted by Chicago University Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Sturtevant, E. H. (1947). An introduction to linguistic science. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Phonetic analogy and conceptual analogy. In Vennemann, T. & Wilbur, T. H. (eds.) Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Vincent, N. B. (1974). Analogy reconsidered. In Anderson J. & Jones C. (eds.) Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics.Amsterdam:North Holland.Google Scholar