Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:12:58.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to David Adger's ‘Remarks on Minimalist feature theory and Move’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2006

ASH ASUDEH  and
IDA TOIVONEN
ASH ASUDEH
Affiliation:
Carleton University
IDA TOIVONEN
Affiliation:
Carleton University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

David Adger raises some interesting issues and makes several valuable points in his ‘Remarks on Minimalist feature theory and Move’ (henceforth MFTM), a response to our review article ‘Symptomatic imperfections’ (henceforth SI) in this journal (Asudeh & Toivonen 2006), which was in part a review of his Core syntax (Adger 2003). In this response, we address some of the points in MFTM. We would also like to set the record straight about some points in SI which we feel have been misrepresented. In several instances, MFTM argues against claims that were not made in SI. Whatever the independent merit of these arguments, we do not wish to defend viewpoints we did not propose in the first place.

Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , November 2006 , pp. 675 - 686
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank Chris Potts and Geoff Pullum for brief comments on an earlier draft. Thanks also to Bob Borsley and Ewa Jaworska at JL and to our anonymous JL referee. Last, but not least, many thanks to David Adger for a stimulating debate and for his comments on this response. We accept all responsibility for any errors.