No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Andrew Spencer, Lexical relatedness: A paradigm-based model. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xxii + 451.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2014
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014
References
REFERENCES
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1998. Episodic -ee in English: A thematic role constraint on new word formation. Language 74, 695–727.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology: A general theory of inflection and word formation. Stony Brook, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995, 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1999. Transpositions and argument structure. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1998, 73–101. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar