Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:07:56.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interpretational preferences of null and overt pronouns in Chinese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2021

AILI ZHANG Open the ORCID record for AILI ZHANG [Opens in a new window]  and
NAYOUNG KWON Open the ORCID record for NAYOUNG KWON [Opens in a new window]
AILI ZHANG
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Shandong Jianzhu University, 1000 Fengming Road, Jinan, 250101, P. R. China aili9710@163.com
NAYOUNG KWON
Affiliation:
308 Friendly Hall, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA nkwon@uoregon.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report three reading comprehension experiments investigating the interpretational preferences and processing of pro and overt pronouns in Chinese, a ‘discourse-oriented’ pro-drop language (Huang 1984). Our offline rating experiments showed that both pro and overt pronouns were subject-based, but the preference for the subject antecedents was stronger with pro than with overt pronouns. In addition, these different levels of subject biases were confirmed in a self-paced reading experiment; a processing penalty was incurred with object antecedent interpretation regardless of the pronominal type, but the penalty was bigger for pro than for overt pronouns. These experimental results are consistent with Accessibility theory that less specific anaphoric expressions (e.g. pro) were less likely than more specific anaphoric expressions (e.g. overt pronouns) to refer to a less prominent antecedent (e.g. syntactic object).

Keywords

anaphoric biasesChineseovert pronounsproreferential resolution
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 2022 , pp. 649 - 676
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We would like to thank three anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees for providing many helpful comments. This research was supported by Doctoral Research Fund of Shandong Jianzhu University (X21061Z).

References

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Fernández-Solera, Susana, Frazier, Lyn & Clifton, Charles. 2002. Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 14.2, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Ted, J. M. Sanders, Schilperoord, Joost & Spooren, Wilbert (eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects, 29–87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J. & Bates, Douglas M.. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J., 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Douglas & Maechler, Martin. 2010. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-34. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package_lme4.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carminati, Maria N. 2002. The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Chen, Ping. 1986. Referent introducing and tracking in Chinese narratives. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chow, Wing-Yee, Lewis, Shevaun & Phillips, Colin. 2014. Immediate sensitivity to structural constraints in pronoun resolution. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, Matthew. 2000. Anaphoric reference in spoken and written Chinese narrative discourse. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28.2, 303–336.Google Scholar
Christianson, Kiel & Cho, Hee Youn. 2009. Interpreting null pronouns (pro) in isolated sentences. Lingua 119, 989–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christianson, Kiel, Hollingworth, Andrew, Halliwell, John F. & Ferreira, Fernanda. 2001. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology 42, 368–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filiaci, Francesca, Sorace, Antonella & Carreiras, Manuel. 2014. Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience 29, 825–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon C. & Sanford, Anthony J.. 1982. The mental representation of discourse in a focused memory system: Implications for interpretation for the anaphoric noun-phrases. Journal of Semantics 1, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In Givón, T. (ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study, 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., Joshi, Aravind K. & Weinstein, Scott. 1983. Providing a unified account of definite noun phrases in discourse. Proceedings of 21st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 21).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., Joshi, Aravind K. & Weinstein, Scott. 1995. Towards a computational theory of discourse interpretation. Computational Linguistics 21, 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69, 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Ihsane, Tabea. 2001. Adult Null Subjects in the non-pro-drop languages: Two diary dialects. Language Acquisition 9.4, 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Bretz, Frank & Westfall, Peter. 2008. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50.3, 346–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Theory 15, 531–573.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Florian T. 2008. Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaiser, Elsi & Trueswell, John C.. 2008. Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 23, 708–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kitaek, Theres, Grüter & Schafer, Amy J.. 2013. Effects of event-structure and topic/focusmarking on pronoun reference in Korean. Poster presented at the 26th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung & Polinsky, Maria. 2011. Anaphoric inventories and bound variable interpretation: Evidence from Korean. Poster presented at the 24th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Stanford University, CA.Google Scholar
Kwon, Nayoung & Sturt, Patrick. 2013. Null pronominal (pro) resolution in Korean, a discourse-oriented language. Language and Cognitive Processes 28, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Rong. 2014. The implicit causality verbs influence on the third person anaphora in Chinese text. Chinese Language Learning 6, 28–35.Google Scholar
Li, Rong, Mak, Pim & Sanders, Ted. 2016. The eye-tracking experiment of the third person anaphor in Mandarin texts. Studies of Chinese Language 1, 83–92.Google Scholar
Liversedge, Simon P. & van Gompel, Roger P. G.. n.d. Resolving anaphoric and cataphoric pronouns. Ms.Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia & Clark, Robin. 2010. Pronouns in Catalan: Games of partial information and the use of linguistic resource. Journal of Pragmatics 42.3, 781–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadopoulou, Despina, Peristeri, Eleni, Plemenou, Evagelia, Marinis, Theodoros & Tsimpli, Ianthi. 2015. Pronoun ambiguity resolution in Greek: Evidence from monolingual adults and children. Lingua 155, 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rohde, Hannah. 2008. Coherence driven effects in sentence and discourse processing. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew, Wu, Zoe & Li, Yan. 2016. Grammatical roles, coherence relations, and the interpretation of pronouns in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 2.2, 1–20.Google Scholar
Tai, James H.-Y. 1978. Anaphoric restraints in Mandarin Chinese narrative discourse. In Hinds, John (ed.), Anaphora in discourse, 279–338. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
Tao, Liang. 1996. Topic discontinuity and zero anaphora in Chinese discourse: Cognitive strategies in discourse processing. In Fox, Barbara (ed.), Studies in anaphora, 485–511. New York: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell & Pu, Ming-Ming. 1991. The management of reference in Mandarin discourse. Cognitive Linguistics 2.1, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ueno, Mieko & Kehler, Andrew. 2016. Grammatical and pragmatic factors in Japanese pronoun interpretation. Linguistics 54.6, 1165–1221.Google Scholar
Walker, Marilyn, Joshi, Aravind & Prince, Ellen. 1998. Centering in discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Qian & Liang, Junying. 2020. The division of labor between null and overt pronouns in discourse anaphora. Journal of Foreign Languages 43.1, 2–12.Google Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung, Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Wu, Jei Tun. 1999. Comprehension of referring expressions in Chinese. Language and Cognitive Processes 14, 715–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Chin Lung, Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall, Wu, Jei Tun & Chou, Tai Li. 2001. The processing of coreference for reduced expressions in discourse integration. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed