Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:42:39.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

J. Foley, Foundations of theoretical phonology. (Cambridge studies in linguistics 20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. Pp. xiii +151.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Richard Coates
Richard Coates
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, University of Sussex.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 1979 , pp. 132 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R. (1969). West Scandinavian vowel systems and the ordering of phonological rules. Bloomington: IULC mimeo.Google Scholar
Anderson, S. R. (1974). The organization of phonology. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973). The nature of a creole continuum. Lg 49. 640–669.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1938). Initial [k[ in German. Lg 14. 178–186.Google Scholar
Bolozky, S. (1977). Fast speech as a function of tempo in natural generative phonology. JL 13. 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, C. E. (1969). Markedness, neutralisation and universal redundancy rules. Lg 45. 863–885.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper, Row.Google Scholar
Coates, R. A. (1977). The status of rules in historical phonology. University of Cambridge PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Cohen, V. (1971). Foleyology. PCLS 7. 316–321.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1966). Assumptions about nasals: a sample study in phonological universals. In Greenberg, J. (ed.), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fischer-J⊘rgensen, E. (1949). Remarques sur les principes de l'analyse phonémique. TCLC 5. 214–234.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1967). Spanish plural formation. Lg 43. 486–493.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1970a). Phonological distinctive features. FoL 4. 87–92.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1970b). A systematic phonological interpretation of the Germanic consonant shifts. LSci 9.11–12.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1971). Phonological change by rule repetition. PCLS 7. 376–384.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1972a). Reply to Cohen.PCLS 8. 458–462.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1972b). Rule precursors and phonological change by metarule. In Stockwell, R. & Macaulay, R. (eds), Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1973a). Nasalisation as a universal phonological process. York Papers in Linguistics 3. 91–104.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1973b). Reply to Posner. York Papers in Linguistics 3. III.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1973 c). Assibilation as universal phonological rule. FoL 6. 251–262.Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1974). An extension of Grassmann's Law. In Bauer, W. et al. (eds), Studien aur generativen Transformationsgrammatik. Frankfurt: Athenaum Verlag.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. (1975). Space, time and person reference in American sign language. Lg 51. 940–961.Google Scholar
Goyvaerts, D. (1975). Present-day historical and comparative linguistics. Part I. Ghent, Antwerp: Story-Scientia.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1968). Prolégomènes à une théorie du langage. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. & Terrell, T. (1976). Stress assignment in Spanish: a natural generative analysis. Glossa 10. 64–110.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1975). Phonology: theory and analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Jespersen, G. (1920). Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Jespersen, G. (1922). Language: its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1974). Strategic design as the motivation for a sound shift: the rationale of Grimm's Law. AL 15.Google Scholar
Lass, R. (1976). On the phonological characterisation of [?] and [h]. In Lass, R., English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maniet, A. (1956). La ‘loi de Lachmann’ et les antinomies de l'allongement compensatoire. In Redard, G. (ed.), Hommages à Max Niedermann. Brussels: Collection Latomus XXIII.Google Scholar
Mikkola, J. (1942). Urslavische Grammatik. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Rubach, J. (1977). Nasalisation in Polish. JPhon 5. 17–26.Google Scholar
Schultz, H. (1952). Vocabolário dos Indios Umutina. JSAm 41. 81–137.Google Scholar
Sommer, F. (1902). Handbuch der lateinischen Laut-und Formenlehre. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. H. (1977). Modern phonology. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Sennemann, Th. (1972). On the theory of syllabic phonology. LBer 18 1–18.Google Scholar
Vincent, N. B. (1978). A note on natural classes and the Wichita consonant system. IJAL 44. 230–2.Google Scholar