We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
James Higginbotham, Tense, aspect, and indexicality (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 26). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xiv+257.
Review products
James Higginbotham, Tense, aspect, and indexicality (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 26). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xiv+257.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
12 October 2010
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Abusch, Dorit. 1994. Sequence of tense revisited: Two semantic accounts of tense in intensional contexts. In Kamp, Hans (ed.), Ellipsis, tense, and questions, 87–139. DYANA deliverable, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1990. Anaphora and attitude de se. In Bartsch, Renate, Benthem, Johan van & van Emde Boas, Peter (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 1–31. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Rescher, Nicholas (ed.), The logic of decision and action, 81–95. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred. 1992. The progressive. Natural Language Semantics1.1, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal philosophy: Selected papers of Richard Montague, edited by Richmond H. Thomason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ogihara, Toshiyuki. 1995. Tense, attitudes, and scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stechow, Arnim von. 1995. On the proper treatment of tense. Semantics and Linguistics Theory (SALT)V, 362–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar