Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:55:35.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Joan Bybee, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca, The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. Pp. xxii + 398.

Review products

Joan Bybee, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca, The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1994. Pp. xxii + 398.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Jouko Linstedt
Jouko Linstedt
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , September 1995 , pp. 425 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. & Dahl, Ö. (1989). The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13. 51–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and aspect systems. Oxford & New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heine, B. & Claudi, U. & H¨nnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, V. P. (ed.) (1988). Typology of resultative constructions. (Typological Studies in Language 12.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. [An enlarged translation of Tipologija rezul'talivnyx konstrukcij (rezul'tativ, stativ, passiv, perfekt) (1983). Leningrad: Nauka.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. (1992). Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, M. (1994a). All you need is what the system needs? In Shore, S. & Vilkuna, M. (eds.) SKY 1994. (1994 Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland.) Helsinki. 157–180.Google Scholar
Nyman, M. (1994b). Language change and the ‘invisible hand’. Diachronica 11. 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, C. F. & Voegelin, F. M. (1978). Classification and index of the world's languages. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12. 51–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar