Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:05:24.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language universals and linguistic argumentation: a reply to Coopmans1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Bernard Comrie
Bernard Comrie
Affiliation:
University of Southern California and Max-Planck-Institut für Psycholinguistik
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1984 , pp. 155 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, C. (1980). Movement and deletion in Old English. LIn II. 261–323.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding: the Pisa lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H. (1977). Filters and control. LIn 8. 425–504.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology: morphology and syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coopmans, P. (1983). Review of Comrie (1981). JL 19. 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einarsson, S (1949). Icelandic. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 73–113.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1981). The history of noun phrase movement. In Baker, C. L. & McCarthy, J. J. (eds.), The logical problem of language acquisition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 86–119.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. M. (1968). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Auwera, J. (forthcoming). Subject–nonsubject asymmetries in the relativization of embedded NPs. In de Geest, W. & Putseys, Y. (eds.), Proceedings of the Brussels Conference on Complementation.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1982). Theoretical implications of subject extraction in Portuguese. The Linguistic Review, 2. 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar