Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:50:25.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch (eds), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. University of Chicago: Chicago Press, 1989. Pp. xi + 315.

Review products

Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch (eds), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure. University of Chicago: Chicago Press, 1989. Pp. xi + 315.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Susan Steele
Susan Steele
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 250 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. (1984). On representations in morphology: case, agreement, and inversion in Georgian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. (1983). Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hoeksema, J. (1984). Categorial Morphology. Doctoral diss. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. In Hammond, M. & Noonan, M. (eds), Theoretical morphology. New York: Academic Press. 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moortgat, M. (1989). Categorial investigations: Logical and linguistic aspects of the Lambek Calculus. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Oehrle, R. T. (1988). Multi-dimensional compositional functions as a basis for grammatical analysis. In Oehrle, R. T., Bach, E. & Wheeler, D. (eds), Categorial grammars and natural language structures. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 349–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. (1981). On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. LIn 12. 245–274.Google Scholar
Zeevat, H. (1988). Combining categorial grammar and unification. In Reyle, U. & Rohrer, C. (eds), Natural language parsing and linguistic theories. Dordrecht: Reidel. 202–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar