Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:17:10.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Markedness and antonymy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Adrienne Lehrer
Adrienne Lehrer
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Standard treatments of antonymy regularly state that of a pair of antonyms, one member is marked while the other one is unmarked. Certain semantic and syntactic properties are predicated of the unmarked (or in some cases of the marked) member of the pair. A few examples are given, usually 20 or so, which bear out the predictions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , September 1985 , pp. 397 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bierwisch, M. (1967). Some semantic universals of German adjectivals. FL 3. 1–36.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1977). Neutrality, norm, and bias. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning. Psychological Review 76. 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. & Clark, H. (1977). Psychology and language: an introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1976). Three classes of antonyms in English. Lingua 38. 281–292.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1980). Antonyms and gradable complementaries. In Kastovsky, D. (ed), Perspektiven der lexikalischen Semantik: Beitrage zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2–3 Dezember, 1977. Bonn. 14–25.Google Scholar
Dubois, J. (1964). Distribution, ensemble et marque dans le lexique. Cahiers de Lexicologie 4. 5–16.Google Scholar
Ducháček, O. (1965). Sur quelques problèmes de l'antonyme, Cahiers de Lexicologie 5. 55–56.Google Scholar
Geckler, H. (1980). Die Antonymie im Lexicon. In Kastovsky, D. (ed.), Perspektiven der lexikalischen Semantik: Beitrage zum Wuppertaler Semantikkolloquium vom 2–3 Dezember, 1977, Bonn. 42–69.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1978). Negation in language: pragmatic, function, and ontology. In Syntax and semantics: pragmatics, Vol. 9.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1966). Language universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds), Syntax and Semantics: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. (1970). A note on a Walbiri tradition of antonymy. In Steinberg, D. & Jakobovits, L. (eds.), Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, L. (1972). On the semantics of logical operators in English, UCLA Ph.D. dissertation. IULC, 1974.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). X¯ syntax: a study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Klooster, W. G. (1972). The structure of underlying measure phrase sentences. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, T. (1983). A theory of non-illocutionary use. University of Arizona Dissertation. Bloomington: IULC, 1984.Google Scholar
Lehrer, A. & Lehrer, K. (1982). Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy 5. 483–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ljung, M. (1974). Some remarks on antonymy. Lg 50. 74–88.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1968). Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pohl, J. (1970). Remarques sur les antonymes. In Cohen, D. (ed.), Mélanges Marcel Cohen. The Hague–Paris: Mouton, 185–192.Google Scholar
Riddle, E. M. (1984). A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes -ness and -ity. IVth International Conference on Historical Linguistics: Historical Semantics/Historical Word-Formation, Blazejewko.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1944). Grading: a study in semantics. In Mandelbaum, D. (ed.), Selected writings, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Van Overbeke, M. (1975). Antonymie et gradation. La Linguistique 11. 135–54.Google Scholar
Waugh, L. (1982). Marked and unmarked – a choice between unequals. Semiotica 38. 299–318.Google Scholar
Zimmer, K. (1964). Affixal negation in English and other languages (supplement) Word 20. Monograph No. 5.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1978). On markedness in morphology. Die Sprache 24. 129–42.Google Scholar